This stock comparison examines KDP, MDLZ, and PEP, three consumer staples giants with overlapping exposure to beverages and snacks. KDP focuses on soft drinks and coffee systems, MDLZ on confectionery and biscuits, and PEP on diversified beverages and snacks. Investors seeking relative performance insights in a volatile market, particularly those prioritizing dividends, valuation, and stability amid shifting consumer preferences, will find this analysis relevant for portfolio positioning and stock comparison decisions.
KDP, or Keurig Dr Pepper, is a leading North American beverage company with a portfolio exceeding 125 brands, including Dr Pepper, 7UP, and Keurig coffee systems. It operates in refreshment beverages, coffee, and international segments, generating over $15 billion in annual revenue. In recent market activity, shares have traded around $27-28, down about 5% over three months and 18% over the past year, reflecting broader consumer staples pressures. Sentiment has been influenced by strategic restructuring in its coffee portfolio, strong refreshment sales growth, and analyst views of 26% upside to fair value near $35, supported by a forward P/E of 12x and 3.36% dividend yield. Market cap stands at approximately $37 billion, with beta at 0.30 indicating low volatility.
MDLZ, Mondelez International, is a global snacking powerhouse with brands like Oreo, Cadbury, and Toblerone, focusing on biscuits, chocolate, and gum across 150+ countries. Recent weeks have seen shares around $55, down 12% monthly and 15% yearly, pressured by elevated cocoa costs and softening consumer demand in North America. Despite this, analysts note 18% undervaluation potential, with investments in premium chocolate capacity like CHF 65 million for Toblerone. Trailing P/E is about 30x, market cap $74 billion, beta 0.37. Dividend yield hovers near 3%, but YTD performance trails peers amid commodity headwinds.
PEP, PepsiCo, is a diversified food and beverage leader with iconic brands like Pepsi, Gatorade, Lay's, and Quaker, spanning drinks and snacks worldwide. Shares trade near $158-160, up 10-12% YTD but flat to slightly down over one year, buoyed by a 3.6% dividend yield and 15% EPS growth. Recent developments include activist settlements, protein snack launches like Good Warrior, and operational enhancements, though North American snack volumes pose challenges. P/E around 27x, market cap over $218 billion, low beta of 0.38. Relative stability stems from international exposure and consistent payouts.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from its library of over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, hedging, and AI/ML models with timeframes from 5 minutes to 62 days. Only the most suitable for current conditions—boasting annualized returns up to +208%, win rates to 95%, and profit factors over 25—earn a spot among the 25 featured. Stats highlight robustness, such as profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 22 and coverage of sectors like semiconductors, energy, and consumer staples. Explore these varying styles and performances to align with your trading approach.
KDP, MDLZ, and PEP operate in consumer staples, offering defensive qualities with dividends over 3%. Business models diverge: KDP's beverage concentration yields higher recent revenue growth (6-10%) versus PEP's 2-5%, while MDLZ emphasizes global snacks. Valuation favors KDP at 12x forward P/E, versus 20-30x for peers. Momentum shows PEP ahead YTD, but KDP and MDLZ lag on commodity and demand risks. PEP offers scale and diversification, KDP growth catalysts like spin-offs, and MDLZ premiumization upside, with all sensitive to input costs and consumer spending.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors KDP for its attractive valuation, trend consistency in refreshment beverages, and catalysts like coffee restructuring, positioning it for relative outperformance. While PEP exhibits stability and MDLZ premium potential, KDP's lower multiple and upside suggest higher probability of near-term gains in the current environment.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KDP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and PEP’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KDP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and PEP’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
KDP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +4.98% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.54% , and PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price fluctuated +0.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164975.86%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.29%.
KDP is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.
Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.04% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| KDP | MDLZ | PEP | |
| Capitalization | 36.1B | 75.7B | 215B |
| EBITDA | 4.19B | 4.97B | 15.5B |
| Gain YTD | -3.511 | 10.553 | 10.412 |
| P/E Ratio | 17.37 | 31.22 | 26.18 |
| Revenue | 16.6B | 38.5B | 93.9B |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | 9.53B |
| Total Debt | 17.6B | 21.8B | 49.9B |
KDP | MDLZ | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 19 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 27 Undervalued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 72 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 74 | 71 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 53 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 20 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KDP's Valuation (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as MDLZ (27) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that KDP's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MDLZ (72) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (22) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (74) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s and somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MDLZ (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as KDP (61) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to KDP’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as PEP (36) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for KDP (94) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and significantly faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.
| KDP | MDLZ | PEP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 35% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 45% | 11 days ago 49% | 5 days ago 43% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 38% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KDP has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KDP jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KDP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDP | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| PEP - KDP | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| KO - KDP | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| FIZZ - KDP | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| MNST - KDP | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| CCEP - KDP | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZ | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| GIS - MDLZ | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| CAG - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| CPB - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| KHC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| MKC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.41% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then KO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| KO - PEP | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| KDP - PEP | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| MNST - PEP | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| CCEP - PEP | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| FIZZ - PEP | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
More | ||||