KDP
Price
$26.57
Change
+$0.15 (+0.57%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
36.1B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MDLZ
Price
$59.00
Change
-$0.09 (-0.15%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
75.72B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PEP
Price
$157.06
Change
-$0.43 (-0.27%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
214.69B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KDP or MDLZ or PEP

Header iconKDP vs MDLZ vs PEP Comparison
Open Charts KDP vs MDLZ vs PEPBanner chart's image
KDP vs MDLZ vs PEP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) vs. Mondelez International (MDLZ) vs. PepsiCo (PEP) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • KDP trades at a forward P/E of around 12x with a 3.36% dividend yield, appearing undervalued with analyst upside potential of 26% amid portfolio restructuring.
  • MDLZ faces headwinds from high cocoa prices and softer demand, with shares down over 12% in recent months, yet seen as 18% undervalued by some analysts.
  • PEP shows year-to-date gains of about 10-12%, bolstered by a 3.6% dividend yield and strategic shifts toward protein snacks, though snack volumes remain challenged.
  • Relative performance: PEP leads YTD, while KDP and MDLZ lag amid sector pressures, with KDP offering the lowest valuation.
  • All three provide defensive exposure in consumer staples, with dividends above 3%, but differ in growth drivers: beverages for KDP and PEP, snacks for MDLZ.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines KDP, MDLZ, and PEP, three consumer staples giants with overlapping exposure to beverages and snacks. KDP focuses on soft drinks and coffee systems, MDLZ on confectionery and biscuits, and PEP on diversified beverages and snacks. Investors seeking relative performance insights in a volatile market, particularly those prioritizing dividends, valuation, and stability amid shifting consumer preferences, will find this analysis relevant for portfolio positioning and stock comparison decisions.

KDP Overview and Recent Performance

KDP, or Keurig Dr Pepper, is a leading North American beverage company with a portfolio exceeding 125 brands, including Dr Pepper, 7UP, and Keurig coffee systems. It operates in refreshment beverages, coffee, and international segments, generating over $15 billion in annual revenue. In recent market activity, shares have traded around $27-28, down about 5% over three months and 18% over the past year, reflecting broader consumer staples pressures. Sentiment has been influenced by strategic restructuring in its coffee portfolio, strong refreshment sales growth, and analyst views of 26% upside to fair value near $35, supported by a forward P/E of 12x and 3.36% dividend yield. Market cap stands at approximately $37 billion, with beta at 0.30 indicating low volatility.

MDLZ Overview and Recent Performance

MDLZ, Mondelez International, is a global snacking powerhouse with brands like Oreo, Cadbury, and Toblerone, focusing on biscuits, chocolate, and gum across 150+ countries. Recent weeks have seen shares around $55, down 12% monthly and 15% yearly, pressured by elevated cocoa costs and softening consumer demand in North America. Despite this, analysts note 18% undervaluation potential, with investments in premium chocolate capacity like CHF 65 million for Toblerone. Trailing P/E is about 30x, market cap $74 billion, beta 0.37. Dividend yield hovers near 3%, but YTD performance trails peers amid commodity headwinds.

PEP Overview and Recent Performance

PEP, PepsiCo, is a diversified food and beverage leader with iconic brands like Pepsi, Gatorade, Lay's, and Quaker, spanning drinks and snacks worldwide. Shares trade near $158-160, up 10-12% YTD but flat to slightly down over one year, buoyed by a 3.6% dividend yield and 15% EPS growth. Recent developments include activist settlements, protein snack launches like Good Warrior, and operational enhancements, though North American snack volumes pose challenges. P/E around 27x, market cap over $218 billion, low beta of 0.38. Relative stability stems from international exposure and consistent payouts.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from its library of over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, hedging, and AI/ML models with timeframes from 5 minutes to 62 days. Only the most suitable for current conditions—boasting annualized returns up to +208%, win rates to 95%, and profit factors over 25—earn a spot among the 25 featured. Stats highlight robustness, such as profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 22 and coverage of sectors like semiconductors, energy, and consumer staples. Explore these varying styles and performances to align with your trading approach.

Head-to-Head Comparison

KDP, MDLZ, and PEP operate in consumer staples, offering defensive qualities with dividends over 3%. Business models diverge: KDP's beverage concentration yields higher recent revenue growth (6-10%) versus PEP's 2-5%, while MDLZ emphasizes global snacks. Valuation favors KDP at 12x forward P/E, versus 20-30x for peers. Momentum shows PEP ahead YTD, but KDP and MDLZ lag on commodity and demand risks. PEP offers scale and diversification, KDP growth catalysts like spin-offs, and MDLZ premiumization upside, with all sensitive to input costs and consumer spending.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors KDP for its attractive valuation, trend consistency in refreshment beverages, and catalysts like coffee restructuring, positioning it for relative outperformance. While PEP exhibits stability and MDLZ premium potential, KDP's lower multiple and upside suggest higher probability of near-term gains in the current environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2026
Stock price -- (KDP: $26.57MDLZ: $59.00PEP: $157.06)
Brand notoriety: MDLZ and PEP are notable and KDP is not notable
KDP and PEP are part of the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry, and MDLZ is in the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KDP: 112%, MDLZ: 65%, PEP: 67%
Market capitalization -- KDP: $36.1B, MDLZ: $75.72B, PEP: $214.69B
$KDP [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $36.1B. $PEP’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $ $214.69B. $MDLZ [@Food: Specialty/Candy] has a market capitalization of $ $75.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $ $333.44B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $ $75.72B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $ $23.66B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $ $14.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KDP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and PEP’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KDP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PEP is a better buy in the long-term than MDLZ, which in turn is a better option than KDP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KDP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and PEP’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KDP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the short-term than PEP, which in turn is a better option than KDP.

Price Growth

KDP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +4.98% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.54% , and PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price fluctuated +0.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164975.86%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

KDP is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

PEP is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.66% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.04% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEP($215B) has a higher market cap than MDLZ($75.7B) and KDP($36.1B). MDLZ has higher P/E ratio than PEP and KDP: MDLZ (31.22) vs PEP (26.18) and KDP (17.37). MDLZ and PEP YTD gains are higher at: 10.553 and 10.412 vs. KDP (-3.511). PEP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.5B vs. MDLZ (4.97B) and KDP (4.19B). KDP has less debt than MDLZ and PEP: KDP (17.6B) vs MDLZ (21.8B) and PEP (49.9B). PEP has higher revenues than MDLZ and KDP: PEP (93.9B) vs MDLZ (38.5B) and KDP (16.6B).
KDPMDLZPEP
Capitalization36.1B75.7B215B
EBITDA4.19B4.97B15.5B
Gain YTD-3.51110.55310.412
P/E Ratio17.3731.2226.18
Revenue16.6B38.5B93.9B
Total CashN/AN/A9.53B
Total Debt17.6B21.8B49.9B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KDP vs MDLZ vs PEP: Fundamental Ratings
KDP
MDLZ
PEP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
651956
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1007255
SMR RATING
1..100
747122
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
615350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
942036
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
508550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KDP's Valuation (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as MDLZ (27) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that KDP's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

PEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MDLZ (72) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.

PEP's SMR Rating (22) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (74) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s and somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.

PEP's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MDLZ (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as KDP (61) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to KDP’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as PEP (36) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for KDP (94) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and significantly faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KDPMDLZPEP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KDP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MDLZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PEP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHF26.150.04
+0.15%
Schwab International Equity ETF™
XCOR80.230.11
+0.14%
FundX ETF
XNOV38.24-0.01
-0.01%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Nov
IBTK19.69-0.01
-0.08%
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Trsry ETF
NMB24.45-0.17
-0.69%
Simplify National Muni Bond ETF

KDP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KDP has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KDP jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KDP
1D Price
Change %
KDP100%
+0.57%
PEP - KDP
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
KO - KDP
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
FIZZ - KDP
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
MNST - KDP
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
CCEP - KDP
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
-0.15%
GIS - MDLZ
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
CAG - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.38%
CPB - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
KHC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
MKC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+4.41%
More

PEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then KO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PEP
1D Price
Change %
PEP100%
-0.27%
KO - PEP
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
KDP - PEP
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
MNST - PEP
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
CCEP - PEP
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
FIZZ - PEP
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
More