KDP
Price
$26.42
Change
+$0.58 (+2.24%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
35.9B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MO
Price
$67.46
Change
+$0.66 (+0.99%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
112.75B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STZ
Price
$163.07
Change
+$12.81 (+8.53%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
28.28B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KDP or MO or STZ

Header iconKDP vs MO vs STZ Comparison
Open Charts KDP vs MO vs STZBanner chart's image
KDP vs MO vs STZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) vs. Altria Group (MO) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • KDP shows analyst optimism with a 26% upside potential from recent price targets around $35, driven by refreshment beverages growth and strategic acquisitions, though shares lag YTD.
  • MO leads YTD performance at over 15% and offers a high 6.1% dividend yield, bolstered by oral nicotine growth and price target hikes to $63.
  • STZ trades at a premium valuation with mixed recent momentum, facing sales challenges but maintaining a moderate buy consensus and 2.8% yield.
  • Consumer staples sector provides defensive exposure, with MO excelling in stability and income, while KDP offers growth catalysts.
  • Relative performance highlights MO's outperformance over 1-year returns near 18%, contrasting KDP and STZ's declines.
  • Valuation sensitivity favors MO at lower forward P/E amid steady EPS outlook.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines KDP, MO, and STZ, three consumer staples leaders spanning non-alcoholic beverages, tobacco, and alcoholic beverages. Investors seeking defensive positions with income and moderate growth in volatile markets may find value here. Recent market activity underscores relative momentum, valuation contrasts, and sector resilience, aiding traders in assessing positioning amid shifting sentiment in beverages and tobacco. Key metrics like dividends, P/E ratios, and analyst targets provide objective insights into their current market standing.

KDP Overview and Recent Performance

KDP, a leading North American beverage company with over 125 brands including Dr Pepper and Keurig coffee systems, operates in refreshment beverages, coffee, and international segments. Recent market activity has seen shares rebound around 8% over the past 30 days, trading near $28 with a market cap of $38 billion. Analyst upgrades, including Wells Fargo raising targets to $40, reflect optimism on a potential 26% upside to $35, fueled by refreshment beverages growth and coffee portfolio reshaping via acquisitions like JDE Peet's. Sentiment benefits from DCF models suggesting 34% undervaluation, though debt from deals tempers gains. YTD returns hover near 1-4%, underperforming broader indices amid 1-year declines of 12-14%.

MO Overview and Recent Performance

MO, through subsidiaries like Philip Morris USA, dominates U.S. tobacco with cigarettes, smokeless, and oral nicotine products, pursuing a smoke-free transition. Shares trade around $66-67 with a $110 billion-plus market cap, delivering strong YTD gains over 15% and 1-year returns near 18%. Recent weeks feature price target lifts to $63 by Barclays amid oral nicotine momentum and 6.1% dividend yield appeal. Stability shines in recent market activity, with shares rising in February on growth engines like nicotine pouches offsetting cigarette volume declines. Consensus EPS for 2026 at $5.57 supports sentiment, though regulatory risks persist.

STZ Overview and Recent Performance

STZ produces and markets premium beer like Modelo and Corona, wines, and spirits across U.S., Mexico, and beyond. Shares hover near $146-147 with a $26 billion market cap, posting YTD gains around 7% but 1-year declines of 15%. Recent performance shows choppiness, with 3-5% monthly drops amid sales pressures, though 90-day gains near 10% and moderate buy ratings with $171 targets suggest 15% upside. Premiumization strategy supports resilience, but competition and revenue softness influence sentiment. Dividend yield stands at 2.8%.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, selected by AI analysis for excelling in current market conditions like volatility and sector rotations. These bots trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto using diverse strategies, timeframes (5min to 60min+), and analyses (technical/fundamental). Stats shine with annualized returns up to +220%, win rates 70-95%, and profit factors to 25+, as in top bots like USAR/SMR/CIFR (+220%, 76% win) or consumer staples trackers (+21-25%, 70-73% win on WMT/COST/PG). Low drawdowns and high trade counts (hundreds) highlight reliability. Explore these for automated insights tailored to today's environment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

KDP’s non-alcoholic focus contrasts STZ’s premium alcohol and MO’s tobacco model, with growth from beverages innovation versus nicotine shifts. Recent momentum favors MO (15%+ YTD) over KDP (1-4%) and STZ (7%), reflecting tobacco stability. Risk factors include KDP/debt, STZ/sales declines, MO/regulation. Sector exposure yields defensive traits, but valuation sensitivity shows MO’s attractive forward P/E (~12x) versus KDP (13x) and STZ (23x). Sentiment tilts to MO’s yield/income trade-off against growth bets in others.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor MO due to superior trend consistency, YTD/1-year outperformance, high dividend stability, and favorable relative positioning in consumer staples amid volatility. Observable catalysts like nicotine growth and analyst upgrades enhance probabilistic edge over KDP’s acquisition-driven potential and STZ’s premium recovery.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (KDP: $26.42MO: $67.46STZ: $163.07)
Brand notoriety: MO and STZ are notable and KDP is not notable
KDP represents the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry, MO is part of the Tobacco industry, and STZ is in the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KDP: 87%, MO: 79%, STZ: 258%
Market capitalization -- KDP: $35.9B, MO: $112.75B, STZ: $28.28B
KDP [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $35.9B. MO’s [@Tobacco] market capitalization is $112.75B. STZ [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] has a market capitalization of $28.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $336.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tobacco] industry ranges from $251.31B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $144.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $23.83B. The average market capitalization across the [@Tobacco] industry is $33.6B. The average market capitalization across the [@Tobacco] industry is $25.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KDP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMO’s FA Score has 5 green FA rating(s), and STZ’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KDP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MO’s FA Score: 5 green, 0 red.
  • STZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MO is a better buy in the long-term than STZ, which in turn is a better option than KDP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KDP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and STZ’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KDP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • STZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MO is a better buy in the short-term than KDP, which in turn is a better option than STZ.

Price Growth

KDP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +4.39% price change this week, while MO (@Tobacco) price change was +2.59% , and STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price fluctuated +7.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164976.25%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.40%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +3.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

KDP is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

MO is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

STZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 08, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+2.02% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

@Tobacco (+1.70% weekly)

The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+3.37% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MO($113B) has a higher market cap than KDP($35.9B) and STZ($28.3B). KDP and STZ has higher P/E ratio than MO: KDP (17.27) and STZ (16.97) vs MO (16.37). STZ and MO YTD gains are higher at: 18.970 and 18.957 vs. KDP (-4.056). MO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.8B vs. KDP (4.19B) and STZ (2.47B). STZ has less debt than KDP and MO: STZ (10.7B) vs KDP (17.6B) and MO (25.7B). MO has higher revenues than KDP and STZ: MO (20.1B) vs KDP (16.6B) and STZ (9.38B).
KDPMOSTZ
Capitalization35.9B113B28.3B
EBITDA4.19B10.8B2.47B
Gain YTD-4.05618.95718.970
P/E Ratio17.2716.3716.97
Revenue16.6B20.1B9.38B
Total CashN/AN/A152M
Total Debt17.6B25.7B10.7B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KDP vs MO vs STZ: Fundamental Ratings
KDP
MO
STZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
616315
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1009100
SMR RATING
1..100
74955
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
622955
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
941398
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MO's Valuation (10) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as KDP (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (48) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to KDP’s and somewhat faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.

MO's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Tobacco industry is significantly better than the same rating for KDP (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for STZ (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that MO's stock grew significantly faster than KDP’s and significantly faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.

MO's SMR Rating (9) in the Tobacco industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (74) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MO's stock grew somewhat faster than STZ’s and somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.

MO's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as STZ (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (62) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to STZ’s and somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.

MO's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Tobacco industry is significantly better than the same rating for KDP (94) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for STZ (98) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that MO's stock grew significantly faster than KDP’s and significantly faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KDPMOSTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KDP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASGI24.180.30
+1.26%
abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund
VOOG433.003.39
+0.79%
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
MBCC35.690.27
+0.76%
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF
JULH24.840.02
+0.10%
Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Jul
NVOH20.67-0.15
-0.71%
NOVO NORDISK A/S (B SHARES) ADRHEDGED

KDP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KDP has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KDP jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KDP
1D Price
Change %
KDP100%
+2.24%
PEP - KDP
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
KO - KDP
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
FIZZ - KDP
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
MNST - KDP
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.40%
CCEP - KDP
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
More

MO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MO has been loosely correlated with PM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MO jumps, then PM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MO
1D Price
Change %
MO100%
+0.99%
PM - MO
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
BTI - MO
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
UVV - MO
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
TPB - MO
28%
Poorly correlated
+10.15%
IMBBY - MO
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
More

STZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with SAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then SAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STZ
1D Price
Change %
STZ100%
+8.53%
SAM - STZ
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.78%
DEO - STZ
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
TAP - STZ
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
MGPI - STZ
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
BUD - STZ
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
More