This stock comparison examines KDP, PG, and UL, three leading consumer staples companies offering essential beverages and household products. Investors and traders seeking defensive exposure amid market volatility may find value in their low-beta profiles and consistent dividends. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in growth catalysts, with KDP gaining from acquisitions, PG from brand strength, and UL from tech innovations. This analysis aids in evaluating relative performance, valuation sensitivity, and positioning for current conditions.
KDP, or Keurig Dr Pepper, produces beverages including sodas, coffee systems, and teas, with a market cap around $40 billion. In recent weeks, shares have shown resilience, climbing amid strong Q4 results with 10.5% year-over-year revenue growth to $4.5 billion and earnings beats. The company forecasts 2026 sales of $25.9-26.4 billion, exceeding expectations, fueled by the U.S. Refreshment Beverages segment and the pending $18 billion JDE Peet's acquisition for global coffee expansion. Analyst optimism is evident with a 26% upside to $35.43 average target, supporting positive sentiment despite broader sector pressures. YTD return stands at 8.53%, with a forward P/E of 12.89 and 3.26% yield enhancing appeal.
PG, Procter & Gamble, dominates household and personal care with brands like Tide and Pampers, boasting a $360 billion market cap. Recent market activity reflects stability but some weakness, with shares down amid competitive and promotional challenges. YTD return of 7.96% trails the S&P 500 slightly, yet outperforms in defensiveness with beta at 0.34. As a Dividend King with 70 years of raises, PG announced a $10 billion payout plan, bolstering income appeal. Analysts maintain Buy ratings, targeting $168 on average, amid product revamps like Mr. Clean. Trailing P/E is 22.76, forward 20.92, and yield 2.75%, positioning it for steady relative performance.
UL, Unilever, offers global personal care and food products like Dove and Ben & Jerry's, with a $146 billion market cap. Shares have faced short-term weakness despite 3-6% YTD gains, prompting valuation checks showing a 15% intrinsic discount. Beta of 0.26 underscores low volatility. Recent developments include AI partnerships with BostonGene and Google Cloud, plus Ventures investments, signaling innovation amid competition. Trailing P/E at 22.18, forward 18.08, and 3.32% yield support its defensive stance. Analyst targets average $74.91, fostering cautious optimism in recent sentiment shifts.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds, each scanning thousands of tickers for optimal signals in current market conditions. These curated bots excel with stats like annualized returns up to +215%, win rates to 94%, and profit factors above 2.0 across styles from 5-minute scalps to swing trades in sectors like consumer staples. For instance, bots targeting leaders including PG deliver +20.65% returns with 70% win rates over short durations. Diverse strategies—technical, fundamental, hedged—adapt to volatility, outperforming benchmarks. Traders can explore and copy these for real-time edge; visit Trending AI Robots to select suits for today’s environment.
KDP, PG, and UL operate in consumer staples, blending beverages (KDP) with broad household goods (PG, UL). Growth drivers differ: KDP leverages acquisitions for double-digit sales potential, while PG and UL emphasize brand loyalty and AI efficiencies. Recent momentum favors KDP post-earnings, contrasting UL’s dip-buying value. Risks include commodity costs for all, but PG’s scale mitigates via pricing power. Low betas (0.26-0.34) suit risk-averse plays. Valuation sensitivity highlights KDP’s cheaper forward P/E (12.89), trading below peers; UL offers yield edge at 3.32%. Sentiment tilts toward KDP’s catalysts versus staples stability.
Tickeron’s AI favors KDP in the current environment due to superior trend consistency from Q4 beats and 2026 guidance, plus highest relative upside (26%) and attractive forward valuation. While PG excels in stability and UL in yield, KDP’s catalysts like JDE Peet's position it probabilistically stronger for near-term outperformance amid staples rotation.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KDP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and UL’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KDP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and UL’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
KDP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +4.98% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +1.43% , and UL (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +5.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164975.86%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.38%.
KDP is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
PG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.
Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Household/Personal Care (+2.76% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| KDP | PG | UL | |
| Capitalization | 36.1B | 337B | 126B |
| EBITDA | 4.19B | 24.5B | 11.3B |
| Gain YTD | -3.511 | 2.010 | -10.115 |
| P/E Ratio | 17.37 | 21.51 | 19.32 |
| Revenue | 16.6B | 85.3B | 59.8B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 10.8B | N/A |
| Total Debt | 17.6B | 36.6B | N/A |
KDP | PG | UL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 51 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 39 Fair valued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 53 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 74 | 29 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 59 | 77 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 80 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KDP's Valuation (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PG (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UL (40) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KDP's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (79) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to UL’s and somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.
PG's SMR Rating (29) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (74) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for UL (96) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew somewhat faster than KDP’s and significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.
PG's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KDP (61) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as UL (77) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to KDP’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
PG's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as KDP (94) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to UL’s and similarly to KDP’s over the last 12 months.
| KDP | PG | UL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 28% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 44% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 42% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 45% | 5 days ago 42% | 10 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 36% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 36% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WDI | 13.56 | 0.01 | +0.07% |
| Western Asset Diversified Income Fund | |||
| ADPV | 42.23 | N/A | N/A |
| Adaptiv™ Select ETF | |||
| JANH | 24.39 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Jan | |||
| FEAC | 29.07 | -0.04 | -0.13% |
| Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | |||
| IUSV | 104.42 | -0.78 | -0.74% |
| iShares Core S&P US Value ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KDP has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KDP jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KDP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDP | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| PEP - KDP | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| KO - KDP | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| FIZZ - KDP | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| MNST - KDP | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| CCEP - KDP | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.