KDP
Price
$26.57
Change
+$0.15 (+0.57%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
36.1B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PG
Price
$145.16
Change
-$1.50 (-1.02%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
337.35B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UL
Price
$58.34
Change
-$0.12 (-0.21%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
126.01B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KDP or PG or UL

Header iconKDP vs PG vs UL Comparison
Open Charts KDP vs PG vs ULBanner chart's image
KDP vs PG vs UL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Unilever (UL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • KDP shows strong recent momentum with Q4 revenue growth of 10.5% and upbeat 2026 sales guidance of $25.9-26.4 billion, driven by acquisitions like JDE Peet's.
  • PG offers stability as a Dividend King with 70 years of increases, YTD return of about 8%, but faces recent share weakness amid competitive pressures.
  • UL trades at a compelling valuation with a 15% intrinsic discount and investments in AI partnerships, though short-term price weakness persists with YTD gains around 3-6%.
  • All three consumer staples stocks exhibit low betas (KDP 0.30, PG 0.34, UL 0.26), appealing for defensive positioning in volatile markets.
  • KDP boasts the highest analyst upside potential at 26%, with forward P/E of 12.89 versus PG's 20.92 and UL's 18.08.
  • Dividend yields are attractive across the board: KDP 3.26%, PG 2.75%, UL 3.32%, supporting income-focused relative performance comparisons.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines KDP, PG, and UL, three leading consumer staples companies offering essential beverages and household products. Investors and traders seeking defensive exposure amid market volatility may find value in their low-beta profiles and consistent dividends. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in growth catalysts, with KDP gaining from acquisitions, PG from brand strength, and UL from tech innovations. This analysis aids in evaluating relative performance, valuation sensitivity, and positioning for current conditions.

KDP Overview and Recent Performance

KDP, or Keurig Dr Pepper, produces beverages including sodas, coffee systems, and teas, with a market cap around $40 billion. In recent weeks, shares have shown resilience, climbing amid strong Q4 results with 10.5% year-over-year revenue growth to $4.5 billion and earnings beats. The company forecasts 2026 sales of $25.9-26.4 billion, exceeding expectations, fueled by the U.S. Refreshment Beverages segment and the pending $18 billion JDE Peet's acquisition for global coffee expansion. Analyst optimism is evident with a 26% upside to $35.43 average target, supporting positive sentiment despite broader sector pressures. YTD return stands at 8.53%, with a forward P/E of 12.89 and 3.26% yield enhancing appeal.

PG Overview and Recent Performance

PG, Procter & Gamble, dominates household and personal care with brands like Tide and Pampers, boasting a $360 billion market cap. Recent market activity reflects stability but some weakness, with shares down amid competitive and promotional challenges. YTD return of 7.96% trails the S&P 500 slightly, yet outperforms in defensiveness with beta at 0.34. As a Dividend King with 70 years of raises, PG announced a $10 billion payout plan, bolstering income appeal. Analysts maintain Buy ratings, targeting $168 on average, amid product revamps like Mr. Clean. Trailing P/E is 22.76, forward 20.92, and yield 2.75%, positioning it for steady relative performance.

UL Overview and Recent Performance

UL, Unilever, offers global personal care and food products like Dove and Ben & Jerry's, with a $146 billion market cap. Shares have faced short-term weakness despite 3-6% YTD gains, prompting valuation checks showing a 15% intrinsic discount. Beta of 0.26 underscores low volatility. Recent developments include AI partnerships with BostonGene and Google Cloud, plus Ventures investments, signaling innovation amid competition. Trailing P/E at 22.18, forward 18.08, and 3.32% yield support its defensive stance. Analyst targets average $74.91, fostering cautious optimism in recent sentiment shifts.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds, each scanning thousands of tickers for optimal signals in current market conditions. These curated bots excel with stats like annualized returns up to +215%, win rates to 94%, and profit factors above 2.0 across styles from 5-minute scalps to swing trades in sectors like consumer staples. For instance, bots targeting leaders including PG deliver +20.65% returns with 70% win rates over short durations. Diverse strategies—technical, fundamental, hedged—adapt to volatility, outperforming benchmarks. Traders can explore and copy these for real-time edge; visit Trending AI Robots to select suits for today’s environment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

KDP, PG, and UL operate in consumer staples, blending beverages (KDP) with broad household goods (PG, UL). Growth drivers differ: KDP leverages acquisitions for double-digit sales potential, while PG and UL emphasize brand loyalty and AI efficiencies. Recent momentum favors KDP post-earnings, contrasting UL’s dip-buying value. Risks include commodity costs for all, but PG’s scale mitigates via pricing power. Low betas (0.26-0.34) suit risk-averse plays. Valuation sensitivity highlights KDP’s cheaper forward P/E (12.89), trading below peers; UL offers yield edge at 3.32%. Sentiment tilts toward KDP’s catalysts versus staples stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors KDP in the current environment due to superior trend consistency from Q4 beats and 2026 guidance, plus highest relative upside (26%) and attractive forward valuation. While PG excels in stability and UL in yield, KDP’s catalysts like JDE Peet's position it probabilistically stronger for near-term outperformance amid staples rotation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2026
Stock price -- (KDP: $26.57PG: $145.16UL: $58.34)
Brand notoriety: KDP and UL are not notable and PG is notable
PG and UL are part of the Household/Personal Care industry, and KDP is in the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KDP: 112%, PG: 111%, UL: 84%
Market capitalization -- KDP: $36.1B, PG: $337.35B, UL: $126.01B
$PG [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $337.35B. $UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $ $126.01B. $KDP [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] has a market capitalization of $ $36.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $ $337.35B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $ $333.44B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $ $19.87B. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $ $23.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KDP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and UL’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KDP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the long-term than KDP, which in turn is a better option than UL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KDP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and UL’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KDP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KDP is a better buy in the short-term than PG and UL.

Price Growth

KDP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +4.98% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +1.43% , and UL (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +5.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164975.86%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

KDP is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

PG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.66% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

@Household/Personal Care (+2.76% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PG($337B) has a higher market cap than UL($126B) and KDP($36.1B). PG has higher P/E ratio than UL and KDP: PG (21.51) vs UL (19.32) and KDP (17.37). PG YTD gains are higher at: 2.010 vs. KDP (-3.511) and UL (-10.115). PG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.5B vs. UL (11.3B) and KDP (4.19B). KDP has less debt than PG and UL: KDP (17.6B) vs PG (36.6B) and UL (). PG has higher revenues than UL and KDP: PG (85.3B) vs UL (59.8B) and KDP (16.6B).
KDPPGUL
Capitalization36.1B337B126B
EBITDA4.19B24.5B11.3B
Gain YTD-3.5112.010-10.115
P/E Ratio17.3721.5119.32
Revenue16.6B85.3B59.8B
Total CashN/A10.8BN/A
Total Debt17.6B36.6BN/A
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KDP vs PG vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
KDP
PG
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
655151
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005379
SMR RATING
1..100
742996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
615977
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
948080
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KDP's Valuation (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PG (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UL (40) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KDP's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (79) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to UL’s and somewhat faster than KDP’s over the last 12 months.

PG's SMR Rating (29) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KDP (74) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for UL (96) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew somewhat faster than KDP’s and significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KDP (61) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as UL (77) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to KDP’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

PG's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as KDP (94) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to UL’s and similarly to KDP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KDPPGUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KDP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WDI13.560.01
+0.07%
Western Asset Diversified Income Fund
ADPV42.23N/A
N/A
Adaptiv™ Select ETF
JANH24.39N/A
N/A
Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Jan
FEAC29.07-0.04
-0.13%
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
IUSV104.42-0.78
-0.74%
iShares Core S&P US Value ETF

KDP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KDP has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KDP jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KDP
1D Price
Change %
KDP100%
+0.57%
PEP - KDP
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
KO - KDP
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
FIZZ - KDP
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
MNST - KDP
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
CCEP - KDP
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
More

PG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PG
1D Price
Change %
PG100%
-1.02%
CL - PG
72%
Closely correlated
-1.98%
CHD - PG
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
UL - PG
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
CLX - PG
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
KMB - PG
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
More

UL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UL
1D Price
Change %
UL100%
-0.21%
PG - UL
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
CL - UL
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
RBGLY - UL
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
CHD - UL
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
CLX - UL
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
More