Advertisement
KLAC or NVTS or QCOM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? KLA Corporation (KLAC) vs. Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS) vs. QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- KLAC showcases robust stability with 20.72% YTD gains and 122.23% one-year returns, bolstered by a recent $7 billion share buyback and 21% dividend hike amid AI-driven semiconductor demand.
- NVTS delivers explosive growth at 51.82% YTD and 326.77% annually, fueled by AI data center pivots and new GeneSiC technology launches, though with high volatility (beta 3.21).
- QCOM lags with a 21% year-to-date drop despite semiconductor revenue strength, pressured by potential Apple modem losses and analyst downgrades.
- KLAC holds a premium valuation (P/E 42.74) reflecting market leadership, while NVTS trades without profits and QCOM at 27.04 amid headwinds.
- All three benefit from semiconductor and AI exposure, but KLAC and NVTS show superior recent momentum over QCOM.
- Investor sentiment favors process control (KLAC) and high-growth power semis (NVTS) in recent market activity.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines KLAC, NVTS, and QCOM, all key players in the semiconductor ecosystem amid surging AI and advanced computing demand. KLAC focuses on process control equipment, NVTS on next-gen GaN and SiC power devices, and QCOM on wireless chips and modems. Traders seeking momentum in volatile tech plays or investors eyeing relative performance and sector positioning will find value here, as recent market activity highlights contrasts in growth trajectories, risk profiles, and AI catalysts.
KLAC Overview and Recent Performance
KLAC, or KLA Corporation, designs and markets process control and yield management solutions for semiconductor manufacturing worldwide. In recent market activity, the stock has demonstrated resilience, posting 20.72% YTD gains and 122.23% over the past year, outpacing broader indices. Sentiment has strengthened following the announcement of a $7 billion share repurchase program and a 21% quarterly dividend increase to $2.30 per share during its Investor Day. Strong demand for chipmaking tools, particularly in AI infrastructure and advanced packaging, has driven revenue to $3.3 billion in the latest quarter, with reaffirmed guidance signaling sustained investments. Analysts project $3.35 billion quarterly revenue, underscoring positive positioning despite elevated valuations.
NVTS Overview and Recent Performance
NVTS, Navitas Semiconductor Corporation, develops GaNFast gallium nitride and GeneSiC silicon carbide power semiconductors for high-efficiency applications. Recent weeks have seen sharp volatility but impressive momentum, with 51.82% YTD returns and a staggering 326.77% one-year surge, reflecting its pivot toward AI data centers and energy infrastructure. Key developments include new top-side cooled QDPAK packaging in 5th-generation GeneSiC technology, a solid-state transformer demo with EPFL for 800V DC AI setups, and appointing Tonya Stevens as CFO. Q4 revenue reached $7.3 million, with high-power markets now comprising the majority, though losses persist amid scaling efforts. High beta (3.21) amplifies swings, yet AI-focused launches have fueled recent surges.
QCOM Overview and Recent Performance
QCOM, QUALCOMM Incorporated, specializes in wireless technologies, including 5G modems and on-device AI computing. Recent performance has weakened, with shares down 21% year-to-date despite 21.09% YTD figures in some metrics, contrasting a modest 10.34% one-year gain. Sentiment has soured due to Bank of America's Underperform rating, citing risks of losing Apple's modem business by 2027 and intensifying competition. Positive notes include partnerships with Wayve for AI self-driving and T-Mobile for 6G evolution, alongside AI robotics chip pushes. Latest quarter revenue hit $12.25 billion with strong semiconductor growth, but memory shortages and downgrades have pressured the stock amid broader sector dynamics.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates top-performing AI trading bots suited to current market conditions from its extensive library of hundreds of bots that collectively trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots employ AI/ML for real-time signals, risk management, and analyses, spanning timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days and styles like trend following, volatility plays, hedging, and swing trading in sectors including semiconductors and AI-related equities. Featured bots boast impressive stats: annualized returns up to +216.77%, win rates reaching 94.92%, profit factors to 8.99, and profit-to-drawdown ratios as high as 22.68, with some trading up to 25 tickers like SOXL in semis or multi-sector blends. Only the most suitable for today's volatility and trends earn a spot here. Explore these bots to enhance your trading edge with data-driven automation.
Head-to-Head Comparison
KLAC, NVTS, and QCOM operate in interconnected semiconductor realms but diverge sharply. Business models contrast: KLAC's equipment focus yields high margins (market cap $192B, P/E 42.74), NVTS's emerging power semis prioritize growth over profits ($2.5B cap, no P/E), and QCOM's chip-plus-licensing blend offers scale ($143B cap, P/E 27.04). Growth drivers favor AI: NVTS in data center power efficiency, KLAC in fab yields, versus QCOM's wireless diversification. Recent momentum crowns NVTS (326% 1Y) over KLAC (122%) and QCOM (10%). Risks include NVTS' volatility (beta 3.21), QCOM's client concentration, and KLAC's cyclical exposure. Valuation sensitivity is highest for KLAC, while sentiment tilts toward AI pure-plays amid sector rotation.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models currently favor KLAC for its trend consistency, financial stability, fresh capital returns, and entrenched AI infrastructure role. While NVTS offers higher upside potential through catalysts like GaN/SiC adoption, its volatility suits aggressive traders. QCOM trails on relative positioning and sentiment risks. Observable factors like momentum and catalysts suggest KLAC holds probabilistic edge in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KLAC’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileNVTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and QCOM’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- KLAC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- NVTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- QCOM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KLAC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVTS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and QCOM’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KLAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NVTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- QCOM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
KLAC (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +3.12% price change this week, while NVTS (@Semiconductors) price change was +29.14% , and QCOM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +6.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +10.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.53%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +11.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
KLAC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
NVTS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2026.
QCOM is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (+10.31% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (+11.63% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| KLAC | NVTS | QCOM | |
| Capitalization | 235B | 2.84B | 145B |
| EBITDA | 5.91B | -67.33M | 14.8B |
| Gain YTD | 47.626 | 72.549 | -19.863 |
| P/E Ratio | 52.15 | N/A | 27.46 |
| Revenue | 12.7B | 45.9M | 44.9B |
| Total Cash | 5.21B | 237M | 11.8B |
| Total Debt | 6.11B | 6.47M | 14.8B |
KLAC | QCOM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QCOM's Valuation (9) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for KLAC (82) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew significantly faster than KLAC’s over the last 12 months.
KLAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for QCOM (87) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that KLAC’s stock grew significantly faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
KLAC's SMR Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (43) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that KLAC’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
KLAC's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (61) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that KLAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
KLAC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (14) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that KLAC’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
| KLAC | NVTS | QCOM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 21 days ago 86% | 13 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HAIL | 37.67 | 0.68 | +1.84% |
| Stt Strt® SPDR®S&PKenshoSmrtMbltyETF | |||
| IWR | 104.18 | 1.46 | +1.42% |
| iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF | |||
| PCEF | 19.96 | 0.14 | +0.71% |
| Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | |||
| DDTS | 21.97 | 0.10 | +0.43% |
| Innovator Eq Dual Drctnl 10 Buf ETF -Sep | |||
| COMB | 25.57 | -0.48 | -1.84% |
| GraniteShares Blmbrg CmdtyBrdStr NoK1ETF | |||
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | +3.26% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 87% Closely correlated | +2.54% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 85% Closely correlated | +1.81% | ||
| ADI - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | +4.99% | ||
| QCOM - KLAC | 77% Closely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| NVMI - KLAC | 77% Closely correlated | +2.83% | ||
More | ||||
NVTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVTS has been loosely correlated with IFNNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NVTS jumps, then IFNNY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NVTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVTS | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| IFNNY - NVTS | 45% Loosely correlated | +5.79% | ||
| TOELY - NVTS | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| PENG - NVTS | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| AAOI - NVTS | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| COHU - NVTS | 41% Loosely correlated | +4.80% | ||
More | ||||