KLAC
Price
$1791.44
Change
+$56.59 (+3.26%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
234.82B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QCOM
Price
$136.20
Change
+$1.73 (+1.29%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
145.33B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RMBS
Price
$126.93
Change
+$6.90 (+5.75%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
13.72B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KLAC or QCOM or RMBS

Header iconKLAC vs QCOM vs RMBS Comparison
Open Charts KLAC vs QCOM vs RMBSBanner chart's image
KLAC vs QCOM vs RMBS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? KLA Corporation (KLAC) vs. QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs. Rambus Inc. (RMBS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • KLAC leads with strong YTD gains of about 17%, supported by AI-driven semiconductor demand and recent shareholder returns initiatives like a $7 billion buyback.
  • QCOM faces headwinds from smartphone market weakness, with YTD performance mixed amid analyst Neutral ratings and a significant share price pullback.
  • RMBS shows long-term strength (62% 1-year return) but recent 12% monthly decline due to guidance concerns, despite AI memory innovations like HBM4E IP.
  • All three operate in semiconductors, with KLAC in process control, QCOM in wireless tech, and RMBS in IP/chips; relative performance favors KLAC in recent market activity.
  • Valuations: QCOM at lower PE (26x), KLAC and RMBS around 41-43x, reflecting growth expectations in AI sectors.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines KLAC, QCOM, and RMBS, all key players in the semiconductor ecosystem amid surging AI and data center demand. Investors and traders interested in tech sector exposure, particularly those tracking relative performance in process control, wireless connectivity, and memory IP, will find value here. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in momentum, with sector volatility influenced by supply chain dynamics and end-market trends. This analysis draws on verifiable data to illuminate their positioning for informed decision-making in today's environment.

KLAC Overview and Recent Performance

KLA Corporation (KLAC) is a leading provider of process control and yield management solutions for semiconductor manufacturing. In recent weeks, KLAC stock has shown resilience amid sector dips, trading around $1,417 with a 52-week range of $551-$1,693 and YTD gains near 17%. Key influences include a March Investor Day announcing a $7 billion share repurchase and 21% dividend hike to $2.30 quarterly, reaffirming guidance despite geopolitical tensions. Sentiment benefits from AI chip fab expansions, though recent selloffs in chip equipment names pressured shares. With a PE of 41x and market cap over $186B, performance reflects strong long-term returns (110% 1-year).

QCOM Overview and Recent Performance

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) designs wireless technologies, including Snapdragon platforms for mobile and IoT. Shares recently hover at $128, within a 52-week range of $121-$206, but face YTD challenges with reports of 24-26% declines tied to smartphone weakness. Recent market activity shows dips exceeding the broader market, influenced by competition from MediaTek/Apple and Neutral initiations like Goldman Sachs' $135 target. Positive notes include a March dividend increase to $0.92 quarterly and $20B buyback authorization. At 26x PE and $137B market cap, sentiment weighs near-term demand softness against AI/PC tailwinds, with 1-year returns around 14%.

RMBS Overview and Recent Performance

Rambus Inc. (RMBS) specializes in silicon IP and chips for high-speed memory and interfaces, targeting AI/data centers. Stock trades near $90 (52-week $40-$136), with YTD at 2% but a 12% monthly drop despite 62% 1-year gains. Recent behavior reflects post-earnings pressure from Q1 guidance below expectations, CFO transition, offset by HBM4E Controller IP launch for AI memory. At 43x PE and $9.7B market cap, performance driven by record 2025 product revenue ($348M, +41%), though volatility questions growth sustainability.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, selected from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Out of 351 total AI bots, 25 trending ones are highlighted for their suitability in current volatility, spanning stocks, ETFs, and crypto with filters for 5min/15min/60min signals, technical/fundamental analysis, and risk levels (low/medium/high). These bots deliver real-time signals with risk management, often posting strong stats like 100% win rates or 171% annualized returns over 30 days in top cases, and up to 279% in select strategies. Various styles include pattern recognition, momentum, and sector-specific plays. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify those aligning with your portfolio.

Head-to-Head Comparison

KLAC, QCOM, and RMBS share semiconductor exposure but differ in models: KLAC's equipment/services tie to fab expansions, QCOM's licensing/chips to wireless/mobile, RMBS' IP focus to memory interfaces. Growth drivers favor KLAC (AI process control) over QCOM's cyclical handsets; RMBS leverages AI memory but risks supply issues. Recent momentum: KLAC outperforms YTD, RMBS volatile post-guidance, QCOM lags on sentiment. Risks include geopolitics for all, competition for QCOM, execution for RMBS. QCOM offers lowest valuation (26x PE), sensitive to consumer trends; KLAC/RMBS higher (41-43x) on growth. Market sentiment tilts to KLAC stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors KLAC based on superior trend consistency, YTD momentum, and catalysts like buybacks/dividends amid AI fab demand. While RMBS offers AI memory upside and QCOM attractive valuation, KLAC's relative stability and positioning suggest higher probability of outperformance in prevailing conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 18, 2026
Stock price -- (KLAC: $1791.44QCOM: $136.20RMBS: $126.82)
Brand notoriety: KLAC and QCOM are notable and RMBS is not notable
QCOM and RMBS are part of the Semiconductors industry, and KLAC is in the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KLAC: 101%, QCOM: 93%, RMBS: 131%
Market capitalization -- KLAC: $234.82B, QCOM: $145.33B, RMBS: $13.72B
$QCOM [@Semiconductors] is valued at $145.33B. $RMBS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $ $13.72B. $KLAC [@Electronic Production Equipment] has a market capitalization of $ $234.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $ $4.9T to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $ $556.33B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $ $122.68B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $ $48.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KLAC’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileQCOM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and RMBS’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KLAC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • QCOM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KLAC and RMBS are a better buy in the long-term than QCOM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KLAC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QCOM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and RMBS’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KLAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QCOM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KLAC is a better buy in the short-term than QCOM, which in turn is a better option than RMBS.

Price Growth

KLAC (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +3.12% price change this week, while QCOM (@Semiconductors) price change was +6.36% , and RMBS (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +14.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +10.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.53%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +11.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

KLAC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

QCOM is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (+10.31% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (+11.63% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KLAC($235B) has a higher market cap than QCOM($145B) and RMBS($13.7B). RMBS has higher P/E ratio than KLAC and QCOM: RMBS (60.10) vs KLAC (52.15) and QCOM (27.46). KLAC YTD gains are higher at: 47.626 vs. RMBS (38.013) and QCOM (-19.863). QCOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.8B vs. KLAC (5.91B) and RMBS (325M). QCOM has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. KLAC (5.21B) and RMBS (762M). RMBS has less debt than KLAC and QCOM: RMBS (25M) vs KLAC (6.11B) and QCOM (14.8B). QCOM has higher revenues than KLAC and RMBS: QCOM (44.9B) vs KLAC (12.7B) and RMBS (708M).
KLACQCOMRMBS
Capitalization235B145B13.7B
EBITDA5.91B14.8B325M
Gain YTD47.626-19.86338.013
P/E Ratio52.1527.4660.10
Revenue12.7B44.9B708M
Total Cash5.21B11.8B762M
Total Debt6.11B14.8B25M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KLAC vs QCOM vs RMBS: Fundamental Ratings
KLAC
QCOM
RMBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23921
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68720
SMR RATING
1..100
134346
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46137
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
131411
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QCOM's Valuation (9) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMBS (79) in the Semiconductors industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for KLAC (82) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM's stock grew significantly faster than RMBS’s and significantly faster than KLAC’s over the last 12 months.

KLAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as RMBS (20) in the Semiconductors industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for QCOM (87) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that KLAC's stock grew similarly to RMBS’s and significantly faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

KLAC's SMR Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (43) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for RMBS (46) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that KLAC's stock grew similarly to QCOM’s and somewhat faster than RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

KLAC's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMBS (37) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (61) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that KLAC's stock grew somewhat faster than RMBS’s and somewhat faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as KLAC (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as QCOM (14) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that RMBS's stock grew similarly to KLAC’s and similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLACQCOMRMBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KLAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QCOM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RMBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMET45.980.71
+1.57%
VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF
QQEW136.681.58
+1.17%
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Sel Eql Wght ETF
CAF18.170.14
+0.78%
Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund
SDEM33.900.25
+0.75%
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® Em Mkts ETF
FFUT57.14-1.01
-1.74%
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF

KLAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLAC
1D Price
Change %
KLAC100%
+3.26%
LRCX - KLAC
87%
Closely correlated
+2.54%
AMAT - KLAC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
ADI - KLAC
79%
Closely correlated
+4.99%
QCOM - KLAC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
NVMI - KLAC
77%
Closely correlated
+2.83%
More

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
+5.66%
LRCX - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+2.54%
AMKR - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+7.11%
KLIC - RMBS
76%
Closely correlated
+2.79%
VECO - RMBS
75%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
KLAC - RMBS
74%
Closely correlated
+3.26%
More