KMB
Price
$98.84
Change
+$0.87 (+0.89%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
32.81B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MDLZ
Price
$57.25
Change
+$0.18 (+0.32%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
73.48B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WMT
Price
$127.50
Change
+$2.68 (+2.15%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.02T
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KMB or MDLZ or WMT

Header iconKMB vs MDLZ vs WMT Comparison
Open Charts KMB vs MDLZ vs WMTBanner chart's image
KMB vs MDLZ vs WMT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Kimberly-Clark (KMB) vs. Mondelez (MDLZ) vs. Walmart (WMT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • KMB offers a strong dividend yield of 5.15% amid a 26% one-year decline, appealing to income-focused investors despite margin pressures.
  • MDLZ faces headwinds from rising costs and weak demand, with shares down 13% in total returns recently, though viewed as 17.9% undervalued.
  • WMT leads with robust year-to-date gains of around 13%, driven by international growth and e-commerce strength in a competitive retail landscape.
  • All three operate in consumer staples, providing defensive exposure, but WMT shows superior relative performance and momentum.
  • Recent market activity highlights valuation contrasts: KMB and MDLZ appear undervalued, while WMT trades at a premium P/E of 46x.
  • Tickeron's AI bots trade these tickers, with WMT featured in a bot yielding 25% annualized returns.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines KMB (Kimberly-Clark), MDLZ (Mondelez International), and WMT (Walmart), all key players in the consumer staples sector. These companies offer essential products—from personal care and snacks to everyday retail—making them relevant for investors seeking stability amid market volatility. Traders focused on relative performance, dividends, and growth potential will find value in analyzing their recent momentum, valuation sensitivities, and sector positioning. This overview draws on current market data to highlight contrasts in a defensive industry environment.

KMB Overview and Recent Performance

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is a global leader in personal care products, including diapers, tissues, and wipes, serving essential hygiene needs worldwide. In recent market activity, KMB shares have faced downward pressure, with a roughly 26% decline over the past year and year-to-date losses around 2-3%. This reflects challenges like declining margins, slowing revenue growth, and heightened competition. Sentiment has been tempered by these factors, though the stock's 5.15% dividend yield provides appeal for income seekers. Recent leadership changes and product innovations offer potential catalysts, positioning KMB as undervalued with analyst fair value estimates near $119.

MDLZ Overview and Recent Performance

Mondelez International (MDLZ) specializes in snacks, chocolates, and biscuits, holding top global positions in these categories with operations in over 150 countries. Recent performance has been muted, with shares down about 13% in total shareholder returns and year-to-date gains limited to around 2%. Elevated cocoa costs, price hikes deterring consumers, and weak demand forecasts have weighed on sentiment. Despite this, analysts view MDLZ as 17.9% undervalued, supported by its strong brand portfolio. Broader consumer shifts toward value-oriented purchases have influenced recent trading, highlighting risks in the confectionery space.

WMT Overview and Recent Performance

Walmart Inc. (WMT) operates as a people-led, tech-powered omnichannel retailer with over 10,750 stores globally, emphasizing low prices on groceries, apparel, and essentials. In recent weeks, WMT has demonstrated resilience, posting year-to-date returns near 13% and a 49% one-year gain. International sales growth, e-commerce expansion, and dividend increases have bolstered positive sentiment. Competitive pressures from Amazon persist, but strong gross margins around 25% and operational efficiencies support performance. WMT's market cap exceeds $1 trillion, reflecting its dominant positioning.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend following, dip buying, and volatility plays across timeframes from minutes to months, with performance stats including annualized returns up to 208%, win rates from 52% to 95%, and profit factors exceeding 25. Only the most suitable for current conditions—such as volatile energy, semiconductors, or consumer staples—earn a spot among the 25 highlighted from 351 total bots. For instance, a WMT bot shows 25% annualized returns with 73% win rate. Explore these tools to enhance your trading edge in today's markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

KMB, MDLZ, and WMT share consumer staples exposure but diverge in business models: KMB focuses on hygiene essentials, MDLZ on indulgent snacks, and WMT on broad retail. Growth drivers contrast sharply—WMT benefits from e-commerce and international expansion, while KMB and MDLZ grapple with cost inflation. Recent momentum favors WMT (13% YTD) over laggards KMB (-2% YTD) and MDLZ (2% YTD). Risk factors include competition for all, but MDLZ faces commodity volatility. Valuation sensitivity shows KMB (P/E ~23x) and MDLZ undervalued versus WMT's premium 46x. Market sentiment leans toward WMT's stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors WMT due to its trend consistency, superior relative positioning, and catalysts like international growth. While KMB and MDLZ offer value and dividends, WMT's momentum and bot performance (25% returns) suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 18, 2026
Stock price -- (KMB: $98.84MDLZ: $57.25WMT: $127.50)
Brand notoriety: MDLZ and WMT are notable and KMB is not notable
KMB represents the Household/Personal Care industry, MDLZ is part of the Food: Specialty/Candy industry, and WMT is in the Discount Stores industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KMB: 85%, MDLZ: 85%, WMT: 115%
Market capitalization -- KMB: $32.81B, MDLZ: $73.48B, WMT: $1.02T
KMB [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $32.81B. MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $73.48B. WMT [@Discount Stores] has a market capitalization of $1.02T. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $341.47B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $73.48B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $1.02T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $19.84B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $14.24B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $117.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KMB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and WMT’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WMT is a better buy in the long-term than KMB, which in turn is a better option than MDLZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KMB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and WMT’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WMT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WMT is a better buy in the short-term than KMB, which in turn is a better option than MDLZ.

Price Growth

KMB (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.60% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -2.97% , and WMT (@Discount Stores) price fluctuated +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.44%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -2.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.01%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

KMB is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

WMT is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.96% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-2.68% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

@Discount Stores (+2.34% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WMT($1.02T) has a higher market cap than MDLZ($73.5B) and KMB($32.8B). WMT has higher P/E ratio than MDLZ and KMB: WMT (46.70) vs MDLZ (30.29) and KMB (20.34). WMT YTD gains are higher at: 14.677 vs. MDLZ (7.274) and KMB (-0.822). WMT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 46.5B vs. MDLZ (4.97B) and KMB (3.11B). KMB has less debt than MDLZ and WMT: KMB (7.3B) vs MDLZ (21.8B) and WMT (67.1B). WMT has higher revenues than MDLZ and KMB: WMT (713B) vs MDLZ (38.5B) and KMB (16.4B).
KMBMDLZWMT
Capitalization32.8B73.5B1.02T
EBITDA3.11B4.97B46.5B
Gain YTD-0.8227.27414.677
P/E Ratio20.3430.2946.70
Revenue16.4B38.5B713B
Total Cash774MN/A10.7B
Total Debt7.3B21.8B67.1B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMB vs MDLZ vs WMT: Fundamental Ratings
KMB
MDLZ
WMT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
601522
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100816
SMR RATING
1..100
117240
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
625948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
542342
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
508550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMB's Valuation (15) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MDLZ (25) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for WMT (92) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that KMB's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and significantly faster than WMT’s over the last 12 months.

WMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for MDLZ (81) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for KMB (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that WMT's stock grew significantly faster than MDLZ’s and significantly faster than KMB’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's SMR Rating (11) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as WMT (40) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (72) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that KMB's stock grew similarly to WMT’s and somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

WMT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MDLZ (59) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as KMB (62) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that WMT's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as WMT (42) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is in the same range as KMB (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to WMT’s and similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KMBMDLZWMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MDLZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WMT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THETA.X0.2156360.016237
+8.14%
Theta Network cryptocurrency
SVAL38.840.85
+2.24%
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF
CHI11.810.03
+0.25%
Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund
WBIF32.62N/A
N/A
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
RSBY18.33-0.17
-0.94%
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF

KMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMB has been loosely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMB jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMB
1D Price
Change %
KMB100%
+0.89%
CL - KMB
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.62%
PG - KMB
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
CLX - KMB
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
CHD - KMB
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.48%
KVUE - KMB
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
+0.32%
GIS - MDLZ
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
CAG - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
CPB - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
KHC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
MKC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.99%
More