This stock comparison examines KMB (Kimberly-Clark), MDLZ (Mondelez International), and WMT (Walmart), all key players in the consumer staples sector. These companies offer essential products—from personal care and snacks to everyday retail—making them relevant for investors seeking stability amid market volatility. Traders focused on relative performance, dividends, and growth potential will find value in analyzing their recent momentum, valuation sensitivities, and sector positioning. This overview draws on current market data to highlight contrasts in a defensive industry environment.
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is a global leader in personal care products, including diapers, tissues, and wipes, serving essential hygiene needs worldwide. In recent market activity, KMB shares have faced downward pressure, with a roughly 26% decline over the past year and year-to-date losses around 2-3%. This reflects challenges like declining margins, slowing revenue growth, and heightened competition. Sentiment has been tempered by these factors, though the stock's 5.15% dividend yield provides appeal for income seekers. Recent leadership changes and product innovations offer potential catalysts, positioning KMB as undervalued with analyst fair value estimates near $119.
Mondelez International (MDLZ) specializes in snacks, chocolates, and biscuits, holding top global positions in these categories with operations in over 150 countries. Recent performance has been muted, with shares down about 13% in total shareholder returns and year-to-date gains limited to around 2%. Elevated cocoa costs, price hikes deterring consumers, and weak demand forecasts have weighed on sentiment. Despite this, analysts view MDLZ as 17.9% undervalued, supported by its strong brand portfolio. Broader consumer shifts toward value-oriented purchases have influenced recent trading, highlighting risks in the confectionery space.
Walmart Inc. (WMT) operates as a people-led, tech-powered omnichannel retailer with over 10,750 stores globally, emphasizing low prices on groceries, apparel, and essentials. In recent weeks, WMT has demonstrated resilience, posting year-to-date returns near 13% and a 49% one-year gain. International sales growth, e-commerce expansion, and dividend increases have bolstered positive sentiment. Competitive pressures from Amazon persist, but strong gross margins around 25% and operational efficiencies support performance. WMT's market cap exceeds $1 trillion, reflecting its dominant positioning.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend following, dip buying, and volatility plays across timeframes from minutes to months, with performance stats including annualized returns up to 208%, win rates from 52% to 95%, and profit factors exceeding 25. Only the most suitable for current conditions—such as volatile energy, semiconductors, or consumer staples—earn a spot among the 25 highlighted from 351 total bots. For instance, a WMT bot shows 25% annualized returns with 73% win rate. Explore these tools to enhance your trading edge in today's markets.
KMB, MDLZ, and WMT share consumer staples exposure but diverge in business models: KMB focuses on hygiene essentials, MDLZ on indulgent snacks, and WMT on broad retail. Growth drivers contrast sharply—WMT benefits from e-commerce and international expansion, while KMB and MDLZ grapple with cost inflation. Recent momentum favors WMT (13% YTD) over laggards KMB (-2% YTD) and MDLZ (2% YTD). Risk factors include competition for all, but MDLZ faces commodity volatility. Valuation sensitivity shows KMB (P/E ~23x) and MDLZ undervalued versus WMT's premium 46x. Market sentiment leans toward WMT's stability.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors WMT due to its trend consistency, superior relative positioning, and catalysts like international growth. While KMB and MDLZ offer value and dividends, WMT's momentum and bot performance (25% returns) suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KMB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and WMT’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KMB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and WMT’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
KMB (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.60% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -2.97% , and WMT (@Discount Stores) price fluctuated +0.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.44%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -2.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.01%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.10%.
KMB is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
WMT is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2026.
Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-2.68% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
@Discount Stores (+2.34% weekly)Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.
| KMB | MDLZ | WMT | |
| Capitalization | 32.8B | 73.5B | 1.02T |
| EBITDA | 3.11B | 4.97B | 46.5B |
| Gain YTD | -0.822 | 7.274 | 14.677 |
| P/E Ratio | 20.34 | 30.29 | 46.70 |
| Revenue | 16.4B | 38.5B | 713B |
| Total Cash | 774M | N/A | 10.7B |
| Total Debt | 7.3B | 21.8B | 67.1B |
KMB | MDLZ | WMT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 15 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 25 Undervalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 81 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 72 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 59 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 23 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KMB's Valuation (15) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MDLZ (25) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for WMT (92) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that KMB's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and significantly faster than WMT’s over the last 12 months.
WMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for MDLZ (81) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for KMB (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that WMT's stock grew significantly faster than MDLZ’s and significantly faster than KMB’s over the last 12 months.
KMB's SMR Rating (11) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as WMT (40) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (72) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that KMB's stock grew similarly to WMT’s and somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
WMT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MDLZ (59) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as KMB (62) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that WMT's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as WMT (42) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is in the same range as KMB (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to WMT’s and similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.
| KMB | MDLZ | WMT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 48% | 6 days ago 50% | 6 days ago 34% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | N/A | 2 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 25% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| THETA.X | 0.215636 | 0.016237 | +8.14% |
| Theta Network cryptocurrency | |||
| SVAL | 38.84 | 0.85 | +2.24% |
| iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF | |||
| CHI | 11.81 | 0.03 | +0.25% |
| Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund | |||
| WBIF | 32.62 | N/A | N/A |
| WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF | |||
| RSBY | 18.33 | -0.17 | -0.94% |
| Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMB has been loosely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMB jumps, then CL could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZ | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| GIS - MDLZ | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| CAG - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| CPB - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| KHC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| MKC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
More | ||||