KMB
Price
$98.06
Change
-$0.48 (-0.49%)
Updated
Apr 21, 11:12 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.71B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PG
Price
$142.81
Change
-$1.68 (-1.16%)
Updated
Apr 21, 01:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
335.79B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SYY
Price
$75.48
Change
-$0.78 (-1.02%)
Updated
Apr 21, 11:52 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
36.47B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KMB or PG or SYY

Header iconKMB vs PG vs SYY Comparison
Open Charts KMB vs PG vs SYYBanner chart's image
KMB vs PG vs SYY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Kimberly-Clark (KMB) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Sysco (SYY) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • KMB offers the highest dividend yield at nearly 4.9%, appealing to income-focused investors amid recent productivity improvements and undervaluation signals.
  • PG demonstrates scale with $85B revenue and steady organic sales growth, though facing margin pressures from costs and tariffs.
  • SYY leads YTD performance at 16.5%, driven by strong Q2 earnings beats and volume gains in food distribution.
  • All three exhibit defensive traits with low betas (0.23-0.60), but SYY shows superior momentum while KMB trades at the lowest forward P/E of 13.8.
  • Recent market activity highlights contrasts: KMB recovering from a 24% annual slide, PG resilient in staples, and SYY expanding partnerships.
  • Valuations position KMB and SYY attractively with forward P/Es under 17, versus PG's premium scale.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines KMB (Kimberly-Clark), PG (Procter & Gamble), and SYY (Sysco), three defensive consumer staples plays spanning personal care products, household goods, and food distribution. These companies offer stability in volatile markets, with strong dividends and essential demand drivers. Traders seeking relative performance edges and investors prioritizing income or growth in staples will find value in analyzing their recent momentum, valuations, and sector exposures amid shifting consumer sentiment and cost dynamics.

KMB Overview and Recent Performance

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) manufactures personal care and consumer tissue products like Huggies and Kleenex, operating in a stable essentials market. Shares trade around $104.58, with a market cap of $34.7B and trailing P/E of 21.5. Recent market activity shows modest gains, with YTD returns near 5% and a 1-year rise of 22.6%, recovering from a broader 24% annual slide linked to sector pressures. Q4 FY25 revenue hit $4.08B, with EPS beating estimates at $1.86, supported by productivity gains amid Kenvue acquisition talks and new tech leadership. Sentiment reflects undervaluation potential, bolstered by a 4.9% dividend yield, though high payout ratios signal caution on margins.

PG Overview and Recent Performance

Procter & Gamble (PG) is a global leader in household and personal care brands including Tide and Pampers, generating $85B in TTM revenue. Current price stands at $153.63, with a $359B market cap and trailing P/E of 22.8. Recent weeks feature mixed momentum, YTD up 8% and 1-year at 9.6%, pressured by commodity costs, tariffs, and product revamps like Mr. Clean. Q2 FY26 revenue reached $22.2B, with EPS of $1.88, highlighting organic sales resilience in beauty and health segments despite margin contraction. Analysts maintain Buy ratings with $181 targets, citing dividend strength over 70 years, though competition weighs on sentiment.

SYY Overview and Recent Performance

Sysco Corporation (SYY) distributes food products to restaurants and institutions, posting $82.7B TTM revenue. Shares closed at $85.23, market cap $40.8B, trailing P/E 23.0. Recent performance shines with YTD 16.5% and 1-year 16.7% gains, outperforming peers on volume growth and AI initiatives. Q2 FY26 EPS beat at $0.99 versus $0.98 expected, revenue $20.8B, prompting raised guidance and partnerships like Reborn Coffee. Dividend yield at 2.5% supports appeal, with low beta (0.60) underscoring defensive positioning amid distribution expansion, though insider sales noted.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection from hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only the highest-performing bots suited to current volatility—featuring annualized returns from 14% to over 215%, win rates of 53% to 95%, and profit factors above 1.5—earn a spot in this dynamic leaderboard. Examples include semiconductor bots with 100%+ returns on SOXL and multi-ticker aerospace strategies at 133% annualized, employing AI/ML pattern recognition, swing trading, and hedging on 5-minute to 60-minute frames. These bots vary in focus from single stocks to 25-ticker portfolios, offering traders tools for growth sectors. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your risk profile and market outlook.

Head-to-Head Comparison

KMB, PG, and SYY anchor consumer staples, but diverge in models: KMB and PG emphasize branded essentials with pricing power, while SYY leverages B2B volume in foodservice. Growth drivers contrast SYY's 1.5% quarterly revenue uptick and earnings beats against KMB's -0.6% contraction and PG's modest 1.5% rise. Momentum favors SYY (16.5% YTD), over PG (8%) and KMB (5%). Risks include KMB's high payout (104%) and debt, PG's tariff exposure, and SYY's cyclical hospitality ties. Valuation sensitivity highlights KMB's forward P/E (13.8) and P/S (2.1) discounts versus PG's premium (P/S 4.4), with SYY balanced at 0.5 P/S. Sentiment tilts positive on SYY's catalysts, KMB's yield, and PG's scale.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SYY for its consistent trend strength, top YTD relative performance, and positive earnings catalysts positioning it ahead in recent market activity. While KMB offers yield appeal and PG stability, SYY's volume-driven momentum and lower forward P/E suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance among these defensives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (KMB: $98.54PG: $144.49SYY: $76.26)
Brand notoriety: KMB and SYY are not notable and PG is notable
KMB and PG are part of the Household/Personal Care industry, and SYY is in the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KMB: 79%, PG: 101%, SYY: 71%
Market capitalization -- KMB: $32.71B, PG: $335.79B, SYY: $36.47B
$KMB [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $32.71B. $PG’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $ $335.79B. $SYY [@Food Distributors] has a market capitalization of $ $36.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $ $335.79B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $ $36.47B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $ $19.91B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $ $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KMB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and SYY’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SYY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMB, PG and SYY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KMB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and SYY’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SYY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMB is a better buy in the short-term than PG, which in turn is a better option than SYY.

Price Growth

KMB (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +2.01% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +0.63% , and SYY (@Food Distributors) price fluctuated +3.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

KMB is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

PG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.

SYY is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.15% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

@Food Distributors (-0.96% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PG($336B) has a higher market cap than SYY($36.5B) and KMB($32.7B). PG and SYY has higher P/E ratio than KMB: PG (21.41) and SYY (20.56) vs KMB (20.28). SYY YTD gains are higher at: 5.037 vs. PG (1.539) and KMB (-1.123). PG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.5B vs. SYY (4.1B) and KMB (3.11B). PG has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. KMB (774M) and SYY (169M). KMB has less debt than SYY and PG: KMB (7.3B) vs SYY (15B) and PG (36.6B). PG and SYY has higher revenues than KMB: PG (85.3B) and SYY (82.6B) vs KMB (16.4B).
KMBPGSYY
Capitalization32.7B336B36.5B
EBITDA3.11B24.5B4.1B
Gain YTD-1.1231.5395.037
P/E Ratio20.2821.4120.56
Revenue16.4B85.3B82.6B
Total Cash774M10.8B169M
Total Debt7.3B36.6B15B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMB vs PG vs SYY: Fundamental Ratings
KMB
PG
SYY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
605115
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005975
SMR RATING
1..100
113014
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
625960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
538251
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMB's Valuation (15) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (38) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SYY (50) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that KMB's stock grew similarly to PG’s and somewhat faster than SYY’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as SYY (75) in the Food Distributors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KMB (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to SYY’s and somewhat faster than KMB’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's SMR Rating (11) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as SYY (14) in the Food Distributors industry, and is in the same range as PG (30) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KMB's stock grew similarly to SYY’s and similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as SYY (60) in the Food Distributors industry, and is in the same range as KMB (62) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to SYY’s and similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

SYY's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as KMB (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as PG (82) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that SYY's stock grew similarly to KMB’s and similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KMBPGSYY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SYY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZSB23.25N/A
N/A
USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Stgy Fd
CGCB26.49-0.01
-0.02%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF
SEPP31.50-0.05
-0.16%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Sep
EZBC44.14-0.68
-1.52%
Franklin Bitcoin ETF
DGP191.67-4.82
-2.45%
DB Gold Double Long ETN

KMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMB has been loosely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMB jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMB
1D Price
Change %
KMB100%
-0.30%
CL - KMB
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
PG - KMB
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
CLX - KMB
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
CHD - KMB
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
KVUE - KMB
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More