This comparison examines KN, PLXS, and VICR, all operating in the electronics components sector with exposure to medtech, industrial, defense, and power systems. These stocks have shown divergent relative performance amid recent market positioning in technology and manufacturing supply chains. Traders seeking momentum plays may eye high-growth profiles, while investors focused on stability could prioritize balanced earnings beats and sector diversification. Key metrics like revenue growth, valuation sensitivity, and sentiment shifts provide insights into their current trajectories.
Knowles Corporation (KN) manufactures specialty electronic components, including high-performance capacitors, RF filters, medtech microphones, and miniaturization products across Precision Devices and Medtech & Specialty Audio segments. In recent weeks, KN reported Q1 2026 revenues of $153.1 million, up 16% year-over-year, with non-GAAP gross margins expanding to 45.5% and diluted EPS rising 50% to $0.27. These results, driven by Precision Devices ramp-ups in energy applications, propelled YTD returns to 48% and 1-year gains near 98%. Sentiment has strengthened on steady growth in medtech and industrial demand, though shares dipped slightly post-earnings amid broader tech rotations. Market cap stands at $2.73B, with trailing P/E of 45x and beta of 1.56, reflecting moderate volatility.
Plexus Corp. (PLXS) delivers electronic manufacturing services (EMS) globally, serving healthcare, industrial, aerospace/defense, and communications sectors from its base in Neenah, Wisconsin. Recent market activity highlighted Q2 fiscal 2026 results, with revenue hitting $1.16 billion (up 18.7% YoY, beating estimates by 2.9%) and non-GAAP EPS of $2.05 (8.8% above consensus). Program ramps and sector diversification fueled share gains, lifting YTD returns to 80% and 1-year performance to 111%. Analysts raised price targets post-earnings, citing mid-teens revenue growth potential. With a $7B market cap, trailing P/E of 38x, and low beta of 0.88, PLXS appeals for its stability in volatile conditions.
Vicor Corporation (VICR) designs and markets modular power components and systems for mission-critical applications in aerospace, defense, industrial, and data processing. Recent weeks saw Q1 2026 revenue of $113 million (beating estimates), EPS of $0.44 (above consensus), and 1-year backlog surging to $300.6 million, signaling robust demand. This propelled shares up 20% post-earnings, with YTD returns at 143% and 1-year gains exceeding 558%. Growth in AI infrastructure and high-density power solutions has boosted sentiment, despite high volatility. Market cap reaches $12.2B, trailing P/E at 84x, and beta of 2.34 underscore its high-risk, high-reward profile.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 AI trading bots from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers, spotlighting those best suited to current market conditions like sector rotations in semiconductors, industrials, and AI infrastructure. These bots deliver impressive stats, including annualized returns up to 169%, win rates of 70-88%, and profit factors exceeding 7 in volatile environments. Diverse strategies span short-term momentum (15-60 minutes), leveraged ETFs, small caps, and multi-agent approaches across energy, tech, and finance. Traders can copy signals via brokerage integration for real-time execution. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your timeframe and risk tolerance.
KN, PLXS, and VICR share electronics sector exposure but diverge in business models: KN focuses on components, PLXS on EMS contract manufacturing, and VICR on specialized power modules. Growth drivers include medtech/industrial for KN, diversified ramps for PLXS, and AI/power backlog for VICR. Recent momentum favors VICR (143% YTD), but PLXS offers lower risk (beta 0.88 vs. 2.34). Valuation sensitivity is highest for VICR (P/E 84x, P/S 24x), while PLXS trades cheapest on sales (1.7x). Market sentiment tilts positive on earnings beats, with trade-offs in volatility versus scale.
Tickeron’s AI would currently favor VICR due to superior trend consistency, explosive backlog growth, and positioning in high-demand power solutions for AI and defense. While PLXS shows stability and KN solid margins, VICR’s catalysts suggest higher probabilistic outperformance in momentum-driven conditions, albeit with elevated volatility.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLXS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and VICR’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLXS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and VICR’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
KN (@Electronic Components) experienced а -0.45% price change this week, while PLXS (@Electronic Components) price change was -3.05% , and VICR (@Electronic Components) price fluctuated +6.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.03%.
KN is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
PLXS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
VICR is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| KN | PLXS | VICR | |
| Capitalization | 3.01B | 6.92B | 12.5B |
| EBITDA | 122M | 297M | 120M |
| Gain YTD | 63.882 | 75.803 | 149.699 |
| P/E Ratio | 49.46 | 37.85 | 91.53 |
| Revenue | 614M | 4.31B | 472M |
| Total Cash | 41M | 303M | 404M |
| Total Debt | 152M | 260M | 7.15M |
KN | PLXS | VICR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 82 | 92 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 58 Fair valued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 14 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 61 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 37 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 18 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KN's Valuation (57) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as PLXS (58) and is in the same range as VICR (79). This means that KN's stock grew similarly to PLXS’s and similarly to VICR’s over the last 12 months.
PLXS's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as VICR (35) and is in the same range as KN (41). This means that PLXS's stock grew similarly to VICR’s and similarly to KN’s over the last 12 months.
VICR's SMR Rating (45) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as PLXS (61) and is somewhat better than the same rating for KN (78). This means that VICR's stock grew similarly to PLXS’s and somewhat faster than KN’s over the last 12 months.
VICR's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as PLXS (37) and is in the same range as KN (37). This means that VICR's stock grew similarly to PLXS’s and similarly to KN’s over the last 12 months.
PLXS's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as VICR (35) and is somewhat better than the same rating for KN (73). This means that PLXS's stock grew similarly to VICR’s and somewhat faster than KN’s over the last 12 months.
| KN | PLXS | VICR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 64% | 7 days ago 68% | 12 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 5 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | N/A | 3 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 82% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QULL | 62.27 | N/A | N/A |
| ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Qlty Fctr TR ETN | |||
| TPLS | 25.10 | N/A | N/A |
| Thornburg Core Plus Bond ETF | |||
| MAYP | 32.09 | -0.17 | -0.51% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - May | |||
| FXL | 191.95 | -2.10 | -1.08% |
| First Trust Technology AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| FDEV | 36.14 | -0.47 | -1.28% |
| Fidelity International Multifactor ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KN has been closely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KN jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLXS has been closely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLXS jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLXS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLXS | 100% | -1.43% | ||
| BHE - PLXS | 73% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| FLEX - PLXS | 71% Closely correlated | -4.00% | ||
| KN - PLXS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.23% | ||
| LFUS - PLXS | 67% Closely correlated | -3.02% | ||
| JBL - PLXS | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.08% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VICR has been loosely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VICR jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VICR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VICR | 100% | -5.81% | ||
| BHE - VICR | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| PLXS - VICR | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| TTMI - VICR | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.63% | ||
| GLW - VICR | 48% Loosely correlated | -7.91% | ||
| JBL - VICR | 47% Loosely correlated | -4.08% | ||
More | ||||