This stock comparison examines KO, MDLZ, and PEP, three consumer staples giants in beverages and snacks. These companies provide essential products with steady demand, making them attractive for investors seeking stability amid market fluctuations. Traders focused on relative performance, dividend yields, and sector rotation will find value in analyzing their recent momentum, growth drivers, and positioning. As defensive plays, they offer insights into consumer trends, pricing power, and international exposure in the current environment.
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) dominates non-alcoholic beverages with iconic brands like Coke and Sprite, operating globally through a bottling network. In recent market activity, shares have traded around $77.58, with YTD returns of 11.73% outperforming the S&P 500's 1.89%. A 12.5% rally earlier in recent weeks stemmed from robust Q4 2025 results, including organic growth and brand investments navigating consumer shifts. Sentiment has been buoyed by regaining the NBA sponsorship from Pepsi's Starry and new product launches like exclusive Walmart sodas, reinforcing pricing resilience and volume momentum. The stock's low beta of 0.33 underscores its defensive appeal, with analysts maintaining Buy ratings and targets up to $90.
Mondelez International (MDLZ) specializes in snacks and confectionery, featuring brands like Oreo, Cadbury, and Toblerone, with strong emerging market presence. Shares hover near $57.94, reflecting YTD gains of 7.64% amid sector pressures. Recent weeks have seen modest weakness due to lingering cocoa cost pressures, though easing commodity dynamics and premiumization efforts like Toblerone upgrades have stabilized sentiment. Analyst upgrades, including Morgan Stanley's Overweight with a $70 target, highlight value as shares trade below recent highs. Collaborations on sustainable cocoa initiatives and investments in production lines support long-term growth, positioning MDLZ for recovery in a value-conscious market.
PepsiCo (PEP) blends beverages and snacks via brands like Pepsi, Gatorade, Lay's, and Quaker, emphasizing diversified global operations. Trading at $156.50, it posts YTD returns around 10%, with recent softness from a 6.4% monthly dip offset by Q4 beats and reaffirmed 2026 guidance for 2-4% organic revenue growth. Activist investor pushes from Elliott Management drive cost efficiencies and health-focused innovations, while losing the NBA deal to Coke adds pressure. Strong productivity savings and a 4% dividend hike to $5.92 bolster appeal, with Piper Sandler raising targets to $181 on pricing tailwinds.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, optimized for current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like technical and fundamental analysis, spanning timeframes from 5-minute expert trades to 60-minute intermediate signals, and volatility levels from low to high. Virtual and brokerage agents offer risk management and real-time signals with no minimum balance, enabling copy trading on thousands of tickers. This dynamic leaderboard highlights bots with proven adaptability, providing traders data-driven edges without manual oversight. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your style and market outlook.
KO, MDLZ, and PEP operate in consumer staples but diverge in focus: KO emphasizes beverages with pure-play stability, PEP balances drinks and snacks for diversification, and MDLZ leans into confectionery growth. Recent momentum favors KO's 11.73% YTD over PEP's 10% and MDLZ's 7.64%, driven by volume resilience versus commodity risks for MDLZ. Valuation sensitivity shows KO at 25.52 P/E most attractive, PEP at 26.13 with activist catalysts, and MDLZ pricier at 30.66. Risk factors include input costs and consumer shifts, balanced by strong dividends and international exposure; market sentiment tilts toward KO and PEP for consistency.
Tickeron's AI currently favors KO based on superior trend consistency, YTD outperformance, and defensive positioning with catalysts like sponsorship wins and organic growth. Its lower relative valuation and stability edge out PEP's diversification amid recent pressures, while MDLZ trails on commodity exposure. Probabilistic factors suggest higher near-term upside for KO in volatile conditions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and PEP’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and PEP’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
KO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +1.90% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.69% , and PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price fluctuated +0.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164976.25%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.38%.
KO is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.
Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.89% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| KO | MDLZ | PEP | |
| Capitalization | 336B | 75.8B | 215B |
| EBITDA | 18.7B | 4.97B | 15.5B |
| Gain YTD | 12.598 | 10.722 | 10.714 |
| P/E Ratio | 25.72 | 31.26 | 26.25 |
| Revenue | 47.9B | 38.5B | 93.9B |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | 9.53B |
| Total Debt | 45.5B | 21.8B | 49.9B |
KO | MDLZ | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 19 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 28 Undervalued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 71 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 71 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 53 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 18 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MDLZ (28) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as KO (43) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to KO’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEP (55) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that KO's stock grew somewhat faster than PEP’s and somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
KO's SMR Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (22) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that KO's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (52) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as MDLZ (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that KO's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as PEP (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KO (70) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and somewhat faster than KO’s over the last 12 months.
| KO | MDLZ | PEP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 27% | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 32% | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 29% | 10 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 43% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 22% | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 24% | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 39% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QQQS | 36.04 | 0.41 | +1.16% |
| Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | |||
| DHDG | 34.13 | 0.13 | +0.38% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Qt 2.5 to 15 Buffr ETF | |||
| NKX | 12.16 | 0.03 | +0.25% |
| Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
| IBIE | 26.22 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term Tips ETF | |||
| AMLP | 52.36 | -0.15 | -0.29% |
| Alerian MLP ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZ | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| GIS - MDLZ | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| CAG - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| CPB - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| KHC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| MKC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
More | ||||