Advertisement
KO or MNST or WMT
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and WMT’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- KO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WMT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and WMT’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
KO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +1.90% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +5.28% , and WMT (@Discount Stores) price fluctuated +2.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164976.25%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.
Reported Earning Dates
KO is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
WMT is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+2.02% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Discount Stores (+0.71% weekly)Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.
| KO | MNST | WMT | |
| Capitalization | 336B | 74.5B | 1.03T |
| EBITDA | 18.7B | 2.53B | 46.5B |
| Gain YTD | 12.598 | -0.626 | 14.461 |
| P/E Ratio | 25.72 | 39.27 | 47.30 |
| Revenue | 47.9B | 8.29B | 713B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.77B | N/A |
| Total Debt | 45.5B | 199M | 68.4B |
KO | MNST | WMT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 73 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 92 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 23 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 34 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 51 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 59 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KO's Valuation (43) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (92) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for WMT (92) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that KO's stock grew somewhat faster than MNST’s and somewhat faster than WMT’s over the last 12 months.
WMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as KO (9) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as MNST (23) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that WMT's stock grew similarly to KO’s and similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
KO's SMR Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (34) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for WMT (99) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that KO's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and significantly faster than WMT’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as WMT (45) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is in the same range as MNST (51) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that KO's stock grew similarly to WMT’s and similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
WMT's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MNST (59) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KO (70) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that WMT's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and somewhat faster than KO’s over the last 12 months.
| KO | MNST | WMT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 61% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 27% | 1 day ago 44% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 32% | 1 day ago 54% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | 1 day ago 68% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 58% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 57% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 58% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 29% | 11 days ago 46% | 21 days ago 33% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 22% | 1 day ago 57% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 24% | 1 day ago 58% | 2 days ago 31% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PJUN | 42.61 | 0.14 | +0.33% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-Jun | |||
| NDVG | 33.68 | N/A | N/A |
| Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF | |||
| TLH | 100.86 | -0.08 | -0.08% |
| iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | |||
| TVC | 24.43 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1998 Series D due June 1 2028 | |||
| EPHE | 25.67 | -0.04 | -0.16% |
| iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | |||
KO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KO has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KO jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +1.40% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
More | ||||
WMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMT has been loosely correlated with COST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WMT jumps, then COST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | 100% | +3.89% | ||
| COST - WMT | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| BJ - WMT | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| PSMT - WMT | 37% Loosely correlated | +4.27% | ||
| TGT - WMT | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.01% | ||
| OLLI - WMT | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
More | ||||