KR
Price
$67.89
Change
-$0.30 (-0.44%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
41.59B
51 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MNST
Price
$77.23
Change
+$0.51 (+0.66%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
75.52B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STZ
Price
$159.82
Change
-$2.46 (-1.52%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
27.71B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KR or MNST or STZ

Header iconKR vs MNST vs STZ Comparison
Open Charts KR vs MNST vs STZBanner chart's image
KR vs MNST vs STZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Kroger (KR) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Constellation Brands (STZ) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • KR (KR) has shown robust year-to-date gains of approximately 18%, driven by strong Q4 earnings and investments in store upgrades amid stable grocery demand.
  • MNST (MNST) reported record Q4 revenue exceeding $2 billion, fueled by international growth, though shares have declined year-to-date by about 7% due to valuation concerns.
  • STZ (STZ) delivered positive year-to-date performance around 10%, supported by beer segment strength and non-alcoholic expansions, despite wine and spirits headwinds.
  • KR exhibits the strongest recent momentum in consumer defensive staples, contrasting with MNST's growth volatility and STZ's sector diversification trade-offs.
  • All three stocks highlight resilience in consumer goods, with KR leading in relative stability and recent price appreciation.
  • AI-driven analysis favors KR for its consistent trends and lower risk profile in the current market environment.

Introduction

This stock comparison evaluates KR (Kroger), a leading U.S. grocery retailer; MNST (Monster Beverage), a global energy drink powerhouse; and STZ (Constellation Brands), a diversified beverage alcohol producer. These companies operate within consumer staples and beverages, sectors known for defensive qualities amid economic uncertainty. Traders seeking relative performance insights and investors eyeing growth versus stability will find value here, particularly as recent earnings and market shifts influence sentiment and positioning in stock comparison analyses.

KR Overview and Recent Performance

The Kroger Co. (KR), headquartered in Cincinnati, operates over 2,700 supermarkets across 35 states, offering groceries, pharmacies, and fuel centers through an omnichannel model. In recent market activity, KR shares have advanced significantly, with year-to-date returns near 18% and a roughly 10% monthly rise. This momentum stems from solid Q4 fiscal 2025 results, including identical sales growth excluding fuel at 2.4% and adjusted EPS of $1.28, beating expectations. Investments exceeding $112 million in Ohio store projects, alongside promotions like 4x fuel points, have bolstered sentiment amid rising gas prices and competitive retail pressures. Broader performance reflects resilience in essential goods demand.

MNST Overview and Recent Performance

Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) develops, markets, and distributes energy drinks globally, with brands like Monster Energy leading in non-alcoholic beverages. Recent weeks have seen mixed stock behavior, with shares down about 7% year-to-date and a 16% monthly decline, despite record Q4 2025 net sales of $2.13 billion, up 17.6%, and net income growth of 65.9% to $449.2 million. International demand and margin expansion drove these results, though valuation scrutiny and analyst price target adjustments, such as Wells Fargo's to $90, have tempered enthusiasm. Performance highlights growth potential tempered by market dynamics in the competitive energy sector.

STZ Overview and Recent Performance

Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) produces and markets beer, wine, and spirits, featuring icons like Corona and Modelo, with operations spanning the U.S., Mexico, and beyond. In recent market activity, STZ shares have posted year-to-date gains around 10%, though with a modest monthly dip of about 3%. Key influences include beer segment resilience and strategic moves like acquiring non-alcoholic brand Hop Wtr, offsetting wine and spirits softness. Upcoming Q4 earnings and a CEO transition to Nicholas Fink signal adaptation to consumer trends. Overall, positioning reflects balanced exposure across beverage categories.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's most promising AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. With over 351 total AI bots—including signal agents for real-time alerts, virtual agents with risk management, and brokerage agents—only 25 top performers earn a spot in this dynamic section, selected by AI analysis for suitability in prevailing market conditions like volatility in consumer staples. These bots employ varied approaches, from price action in 5-minute to 60-minute frames to fundamental scans in growth sectors, often posting impressive stats such as 30-day annualized returns up to 171% and win rates exceeding 88% in recent periods. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify tools aligned with current trends in stocks like KR, MNST, and STZ.

Head-to-Head Comparison

KR, MNST, and STZ span grocery retail and beverages, with KR anchored in defensive staples, MNST in high-growth energy drinks, and STZ blending beer dominance with wine/spirits exposure. Growth drivers differ: MNST's international expansion yields higher revenue surges (17.6% Q4), versus KR's steady 2.4% identical sales and STZ's beer-led stability amid wine declines. Recent momentum favors KR (18% YTD), over STZ (10%) and lagging MNST (-7%). Risk factors include MNST's valuation sensitivity, STZ's category shifts, and KR's competitive pricing pressures. Sector-wise, KR offers lowest volatility, while MNST and STZ face consumer discretionary swings. Market sentiment leans toward KR's reliability in uncertain times.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors KR based on superior trend consistency, recent momentum exceeding 10% monthly, and stability from essential retail demand. While MNST shows strong sales catalysts and STZ benefits from diversification, KR's relative positioning and lower drawdowns suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term across observable factors.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (KR: $67.89MNST: $77.23STZ: $159.82)
Brand notoriety: KR and STZ are notable and MNST is not notable
KR represents the Food Retail industry, MNST is part of the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry, and STZ is in the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KR: 77%, MNST: 134%, STZ: 103%
Market capitalization -- KR: $41.59B, MNST: $75.52B, STZ: $27.71B
KR [@Food Retail] is valued at $41.59B. MNST’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $75.52B. STZ [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] has a market capitalization of $27.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $52.15B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $324.88B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $147.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12.69B. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $23.45B. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $25.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and STZ’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNST is a better buy in the long-term than KR, which in turn is a better option than STZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and STZ’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNST is a better buy in the short-term than STZ, which in turn is a better option than KR.

Price Growth

KR (@Food Retail) experienced а -0.21% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +2.74% , and STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price fluctuated -2.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +1.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.61%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +83822.82%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

KR is expected to report earnings on Jun 11, 2026.

MNST is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

STZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 08, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (+1.76% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.29% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+0.30% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNST($75.5B) has a higher market cap than KR($41.6B) and STZ($27.7B). KR has higher P/E ratio than MNST and STZ: KR (44.08) vs MNST (39.81) and STZ (16.63). STZ YTD gains are higher at: 16.599 vs. KR (9.204) and MNST (0.730). KR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.76B vs. MNST (2.53B) and STZ (2.47B). KR has more cash in the bank: 4.58B vs. MNST (2.77B) and STZ (152M). MNST has less debt than STZ and KR: MNST (199M) vs STZ (10.7B) and KR (24.7B). KR has higher revenues than STZ and MNST: KR (148B) vs STZ (9.38B) and MNST (8.29B).
KRMNSTSTZ
Capitalization41.6B75.5B27.7B
EBITDA5.76B2.53B2.47B
Gain YTD9.2040.73016.599
P/E Ratio44.0839.8116.63
Revenue148B8.29B9.38B
Total Cash4.58B2.77B152M
Total Debt24.7B199M10.7B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KR vs MNST vs STZ: Fundamental Ratings
KR
MNST
STZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
546960
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2524100
SMR RATING
1..100
563555
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
595051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
116381
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
507550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STZ's Valuation (41) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KR (55) in the Food Retail industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (93) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that STZ's stock grew similarly to KR’s and somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KR (25) in the Food Retail industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for STZ (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to KR’s and significantly faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's SMR Rating (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as KR (56) in the Food Retail industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to STZ’s and similarly to KR’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (51) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as KR (59) in the Food Retail industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to STZ’s and similarly to KR’s over the last 12 months.

KR's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Food Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (63) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for STZ (81) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that KR's stock grew somewhat faster than MNST’s and significantly faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KRMNSTSTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XSW155.802.14
+1.39%
State StreetSPDRS&PSftwr&SvcsETF
EQIN50.430.11
+0.22%
Columbia US Equity Income ETF
SHM48.000.01
+0.02%
Stt Strt® SPDR® Nuveen ICE S/T MuncplETF
GLV6.11N/A
-0.08%
Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund
JGRW26.45-0.16
-0.61%
Jensen Quality Growth ETF

MNST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNST
1D Price
Change %
MNST100%
+0.66%
CCEP - MNST
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
KO - MNST
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
PEP - MNST
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
CELH - MNST
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.17%
KDP - MNST
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
More