This stock comparison evaluates KR (Kroger), a leading U.S. grocery retailer; MNST (Monster Beverage), a global energy drink powerhouse; and STZ (Constellation Brands), a diversified beverage alcohol producer. These companies operate within consumer staples and beverages, sectors known for defensive qualities amid economic uncertainty. Traders seeking relative performance insights and investors eyeing growth versus stability will find value here, particularly as recent earnings and market shifts influence sentiment and positioning in stock comparison analyses.
The Kroger Co. (KR), headquartered in Cincinnati, operates over 2,700 supermarkets across 35 states, offering groceries, pharmacies, and fuel centers through an omnichannel model. In recent market activity, KR shares have advanced significantly, with year-to-date returns near 18% and a roughly 10% monthly rise. This momentum stems from solid Q4 fiscal 2025 results, including identical sales growth excluding fuel at 2.4% and adjusted EPS of $1.28, beating expectations. Investments exceeding $112 million in Ohio store projects, alongside promotions like 4x fuel points, have bolstered sentiment amid rising gas prices and competitive retail pressures. Broader performance reflects resilience in essential goods demand.
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) develops, markets, and distributes energy drinks globally, with brands like Monster Energy leading in non-alcoholic beverages. Recent weeks have seen mixed stock behavior, with shares down about 7% year-to-date and a 16% monthly decline, despite record Q4 2025 net sales of $2.13 billion, up 17.6%, and net income growth of 65.9% to $449.2 million. International demand and margin expansion drove these results, though valuation scrutiny and analyst price target adjustments, such as Wells Fargo's to $90, have tempered enthusiasm. Performance highlights growth potential tempered by market dynamics in the competitive energy sector.
Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) produces and markets beer, wine, and spirits, featuring icons like Corona and Modelo, with operations spanning the U.S., Mexico, and beyond. In recent market activity, STZ shares have posted year-to-date gains around 10%, though with a modest monthly dip of about 3%. Key influences include beer segment resilience and strategic moves like acquiring non-alcoholic brand Hop Wtr, offsetting wine and spirits softness. Upcoming Q4 earnings and a CEO transition to Nicholas Fink signal adaptation to consumer trends. Overall, positioning reflects balanced exposure across beverage categories.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's most promising AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. With over 351 total AI bots—including signal agents for real-time alerts, virtual agents with risk management, and brokerage agents—only 25 top performers earn a spot in this dynamic section, selected by AI analysis for suitability in prevailing market conditions like volatility in consumer staples. These bots employ varied approaches, from price action in 5-minute to 60-minute frames to fundamental scans in growth sectors, often posting impressive stats such as 30-day annualized returns up to 171% and win rates exceeding 88% in recent periods. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify tools aligned with current trends in stocks like KR, MNST, and STZ.
KR, MNST, and STZ span grocery retail and beverages, with KR anchored in defensive staples, MNST in high-growth energy drinks, and STZ blending beer dominance with wine/spirits exposure. Growth drivers differ: MNST's international expansion yields higher revenue surges (17.6% Q4), versus KR's steady 2.4% identical sales and STZ's beer-led stability amid wine declines. Recent momentum favors KR (18% YTD), over STZ (10%) and lagging MNST (-7%). Risk factors include MNST's valuation sensitivity, STZ's category shifts, and KR's competitive pricing pressures. Sector-wise, KR offers lowest volatility, while MNST and STZ face consumer discretionary swings. Market sentiment leans toward KR's reliability in uncertain times.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors KR based on superior trend consistency, recent momentum exceeding 10% monthly, and stability from essential retail demand. While MNST shows strong sales catalysts and STZ benefits from diversification, KR's relative positioning and lower drawdowns suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term across observable factors.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and STZ’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and STZ’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
KR (@Food Retail) experienced а -0.21% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +2.74% , and STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price fluctuated -2.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +1.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.61%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +83822.82%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.70%.
KR is expected to report earnings on Jun 11, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
STZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 08, 2026.
The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.29% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+0.30% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
| KR | MNST | STZ | |
| Capitalization | 41.6B | 75.5B | 27.7B |
| EBITDA | 5.76B | 2.53B | 2.47B |
| Gain YTD | 9.204 | 0.730 | 16.599 |
| P/E Ratio | 44.08 | 39.81 | 16.63 |
| Revenue | 148B | 8.29B | 9.38B |
| Total Cash | 4.58B | 2.77B | 152M |
| Total Debt | 24.7B | 199M | 10.7B |
KR | MNST | STZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 69 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 93 Overvalued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 24 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 35 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 50 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 63 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STZ's Valuation (41) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KR (55) in the Food Retail industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (93) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that STZ's stock grew similarly to KR’s and somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KR (25) in the Food Retail industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for STZ (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to KR’s and significantly faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's SMR Rating (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as KR (56) in the Food Retail industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to STZ’s and similarly to KR’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (51) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as KR (59) in the Food Retail industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to STZ’s and similarly to KR’s over the last 12 months.
KR's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Food Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (63) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for STZ (81) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that KR's stock grew somewhat faster than MNST’s and significantly faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.
| KR | MNST | STZ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 1 day ago 58% | 12 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 46% | 7 days ago 47% | 1 day ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 44% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XSW | 155.80 | 2.14 | +1.39% |
| State StreetSPDRS&PSftwr&SvcsETF | |||
| EQIN | 50.43 | 0.11 | +0.22% |
| Columbia US Equity Income ETF | |||
| SHM | 48.00 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Stt Strt® SPDR® Nuveen ICE S/T MuncplETF | |||
| GLV | 6.11 | N/A | -0.08% |
| Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund | |||
| JGRW | 26.45 | -0.16 | -0.61% |
| Jensen Quality Growth ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 36% Loosely correlated | -4.17% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
More | ||||