Advertisement
KR or PEP or PG
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Kroger (KR) vs. PepsiCo (PEP) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- KR shares have exhibited strong recent momentum, rising over 8% in recent trading sessions to around $74, supported by AI leadership hires amid store optimization.
- PEP trades near $159 with stable performance, focusing on protein snacks and health beverages despite volume challenges in a competitive landscape.
- PG hovers at $154, showing YTD gains of about 8% but recent weakness, bolstered by analyst buy ratings and product innovations like Mr. Clean revamps.
- All three offer defensive consumer staples exposure, with KR at a forward P/E of 16x, PEP at 26x, and PG at 23x; dividend yields range from 2.5-3%.
- Recent market volatility from geopolitical tensions has favored KR's outperformance relative to peers in consumer staples.
- Tickeron's AI bots highlight consumer staples trends, with some achieving 70%+ win rates on related tickers like PG.
Introduction
This comparison examines KR (Kroger), PEP (PepsiCo), and PG (Procter & Gamble), three stalwarts in consumer staples. KR leads in grocery retailing, PEP dominates beverages and snacks, and PG excels in household essentials. Investors seeking defensive positions amid market volatility—from oil surges to geopolitical risks—may value their relative stability, dividend reliability, and exposure to essential goods. Traders focused on short-term momentum or AI-driven signals will find insights into recent price behavior, sentiment, and sector dynamics relevant for stock comparison and relative performance analysis.
KR Overview and Recent Performance
The Kroger Co. (KR), a leading U.S. grocery retailer, operates over 2,700 stores under banners like Ralphs and Fred Meyer. In recent market activity, KR shares surged more than 8% over two sessions to around $74, hitting 52-week highs near $75. This momentum follows the appointment of a Chief Data and AI Officer to enhance automation and customer engagement, alongside ongoing store optimizations including closures for efficiency. Despite thin margins and a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.56, the stock's low beta of 0.59 and forward P/E of 16.4x reflect value appeal. Sentiment has improved on e-commerce growth and focus on affordable fresh foods under new CEO Greg Foran, amid broader grocery sector pressures.
PEP Overview and Recent Performance
PepsiCo Inc. (PEP) is a global leader in beverages and convenient foods, with brands like Pepsi, Gatorade, and Frito-Lay. Shares have traded steadily around $159 in recent weeks, with a 52-week range of $128-$171 and YTD gains lagging the S&P 500. Volume declines of 2.1% over two years and operating margins at 12.2% highlight challenges from competition and shifting preferences, prompting launches of high-protein snacks and low-sugar drinks targeting a $400 billion healthy foods market by 2033. A trailing P/E of 26.6x and dividend yield near 3% underscore its appeal as a Dividend Aristocrat. Market positioning remains resilient, supported by international sales offsetting domestic softness.
PG Overview and Recent Performance
Procter & Gamble Co. (PG) produces essential consumer goods like Tide, Pampers, and Gillette, serving a vast global portfolio. Shares have fluctuated around $154 recently, with YTD returns of approximately 8% but underperforming over 52 weeks amid margin pressures from tariffs and costs. Citi maintains a Buy rating with a $181 target, citing product revamps such as Mr. Clean. A market cap exceeding $350 billion, P/E of 22.8x, and 2.75% yield reflect premium stability, with 70 years of dividend increases. Recent dips steeper than the S&P 500 stem from flat organic sales, yet core EPS guidance of $6.83-$7.09 signals steady execution in a defensive sector.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only the most suitable for current volatility—such as those excelling in consumer staples, semiconductors, and leveraged ETFs—earn a spot here. Stats highlight impressive ranges: annualized returns up to +215%, win rates of 70-95%, profit factors to 25+, and low drawdowns in live simulations. For instance, bots on consumer staples like PG, WMT, and HD show 70%+ win rates with +20% returns over short holds. These virtual, signal, and brokerage agents use AI/ML for trend-following, dip-buying, and hedging. Explore Trending AI Robots to copy top performers tailored to today's market.
Head-to-Head Comparison
KR, PEP, and PG anchor consumer staples but differ in models: KR's retail faces volume competition and thin 1.8% net margins, contrasting PEP and PG's branded CPG focus with higher barriers. Growth drivers include KR's AI/e-commerce push, PEP's health innovations amid 4.8% revenue outlook, and PG's tariff-hit stability. Recent momentum favors KR (9% 52-week gain), over PG (-10%) and PEP (flat). Risks: KR's liquidity (0.88 current ratio), PEP/ PG's volume sensitivity. Valuations position KR cheapest (16x), with peers at 23-27x; sentiment tilts to KR on value, PG on dividends.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward KR based on superior recent trend consistency, momentum breakout above 50-day averages, and relative value in consumer staples. Its low beta and AI catalysts position it well amid volatility, with higher probability of outperformance versus PEP's volume headwinds or PG's premium pricing. This probabilistic edge stems from observable factors like 52-week highs and sector rotations.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePEP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and PG’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- KR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PEP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and PG’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
KR (@Food Retail) experienced а +0.29% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +0.39% , and PG (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +1.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.52%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +102640.23%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
KR is expected to report earnings on Jun 11, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
PG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food Retail (+1.74% weekly)The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.67% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Household/Personal Care (+1.05% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| KR | PEP | PG | |
| Capitalization | 41.6B | 215B | 336B |
| EBITDA | 5.76B | 15.5B | 24.5B |
| Gain YTD | 9.686 | 10.362 | 1.539 |
| P/E Ratio | 44.08 | 24.65 | 21.41 |
| Revenue | 148B | 93.9B | 85.3B |
| Total Cash | 4.58B | 9.53B | 10.8B |
| Total Debt | 24.7B | 49.9B | 36.6B |
KR | PEP | PG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 26 Undervalued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 59 | 54 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 21 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 32 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 42 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PG (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as KR (55) in the Food Retail industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to KR’s over the last 12 months.
KR's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as PG (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PEP (59) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that KR's stock grew similarly to PG’s and somewhat faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (21) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PG (30) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KR (56) in the Food Retail industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to PG’s and somewhat faster than KR’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PG (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as KR (59) in the Food Retail industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to KR’s over the last 12 months.
KR's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as PEP (42) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for PG (81) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that KR's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and significantly faster than PG’s over the last 12 months.
| KR | PEP | PG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 41% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 42% | 4 days ago 43% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 12 days ago 39% | 12 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 46% | 6 days ago 44% | 5 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 36% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 35% | 4 days ago 35% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FYT | 66.55 | 1.46 | +2.24% |
| First Trust Small Cap Val AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| IJR | 135.39 | 2.70 | +2.03% |
| iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | |||
| ULTY | 32.21 | 0.50 | +1.58% |
| YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strat ETF | |||
| CAFG | 29.52 | 0.46 | +1.57% |
| Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Gr Ldrs ETF | |||
| WCPB | 25.57 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Weitz Core Plus Bond ETF | |||
KR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KR has been loosely correlated with ACI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KR jumps, then ACI could also see price increases.
PEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then KO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| KO - PEP | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| KDP - PEP | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| FIZZ - PEP | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| MNST - PEP | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| COKE - PEP | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
More | ||||
PG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.