Advertisement
KTOS or LHX or RTX
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Kratos Defense & Security Solutions (KTOS) vs. L3Harris Technologies (LHX) vs. RTX Corporation (RTX) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- KTOS has delivered exceptional long-term gains, with 1-year returns exceeding 150%, driven by unmanned systems and hypersonic growth, though recent weeks show heightened volatility.
- LHX leads year-to-date performance at around 20%, bolstered by strong orders and missile investments amid rising defense budgets.
- RTX offers stability with a massive $268 billion backlog and diversified exposure across commercial and defense, posting steady YTD gains of about 6%.
- All three benefit from geopolitical tensions and U.S. defense spending, but KTOS shows superior revenue growth at 18%+ annually versus peers' mid-single digits.
- Recent market activity reflects sector rotation, with KTOS pulling back sharply while LHX and RTX demonstrate relative resilience.
- Valuation contrasts highlight KTOS's premium pricing on growth prospects compared to more mature LHX and RTX.
Introduction
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions (KTOS), L3Harris Technologies (LHX), and RTX Corporation (RTX) represent key players in the aerospace and defense sector, specializing in unmanned systems, communications, missiles, and integrated defense technologies. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for traders eyeing momentum from geopolitical shifts and investors seeking exposure to sustained U.S. defense budgets nearing $1 trillion. Amid recent contract wins and budget tailwinds, these stocks offer insights into growth versus stability trade-offs in a high-demand environment.
KTOS Overview and Recent Performance
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions (KTOS) focuses on affordable unmanned aerial systems, hypersonic vehicles, and satellite ground systems for national security clients, primarily the U.S. Department of Defense. In recent market activity, shares have experienced significant volatility, dropping over 20% in the past month after peaking near $95, influenced by a $1.2 billion stock offering and broader sector pressures. Full-year 2025 revenues reached $1.35 billion, up 18.5%, with Q4 at $345 million surpassing estimates by 5%, driven by 20% organic growth in unmanned and propulsion segments. A 1.3 book-to-bill ratio and $1.2 billion backlog underscore demand for drones and counter-UAS tech, though high P/E above 500x reflects growth expectations amid execution risks.
LHX Overview and Recent Performance
L3Harris Technologies (LHX) delivers mission-critical communications, missile solutions, and space systems, operating through segments like Communications & Spectrum Dominance and Missile Solutions. Recent weeks have seen shares fluctuate around $350-$370, with YTD gains near 20% fueled by a $1 billion investment in rocket motors and high-volume counter-drone production. Full-year 2025 revenues hit $21.9 billion, up 3% organically, with Q4 at $5.6 billion and adjusted EPS of $2.86 beating forecasts. Orders reached $27.5 billion for a 1.3x book-to-bill, supported by tactical radios and hypersonic advancements. Sentiment remains positive on defense electronics demand, balancing growth with a more moderate P/E around 40x.
RTX Overview and Recent Performance
RTX Corporation (RTX), encompassing Collins Aerospace, Pratt & Whitney, and Raytheon, provides engines, missiles, radars, and avionics for global military and commercial use. Shares have traded steadily around $200, up about 6% YTD, with recent dips amid market-wide industrials pressure but resilience from a record $268 billion backlog. 2025 revenues grew 9.7% to $88.6 billion, with Q4 sales of $24.2 billion and EPS of $1.55 exceeding expectations. Key drivers include multi-billion missile contracts like Tomahawk expansions and facility upgrades, enhancing air defense capabilities. Diversified revenue streams mitigate risks, supporting consistent performance versus pure-play peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies like pattern recognition, momentum, and sector rotation. Only those demonstrating superior adaptation to current market conditions—such as volatility in defense or cyclical sectors—earn a spot, with recent standouts posting 30-day annualized returns up to 171%, win rates of 88-100%, and profit factors exceeding 2.0 on timeframes from 15 minutes to daily. These bots vary in style, from aggressive breakout plays to conservative mean-reversion, often delivering 63-279% annualized across ETFs and stocks. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots suited to your risk profile and market outlook.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In business models, KTOS emphasizes high-growth, low-cost unmanned and hypersonic tech, contrasting LHX's integrated communications/missiles and RTX's broad aerospace-defense portfolio. Growth drivers favor KTOS at 18%+ revenue expansion versus 3-10% for peers, tied to drone proliferation. Recent momentum highlights LHX's YTD edge, while KTOS boasts 150%+ 1-year gains but recent pullbacks; RTX prioritizes backlog execution. Risks include KTOS's dilution and volatility, LHX's segment shifts, and RTX's commercial exposure. All share heavy sector reliance on U.S. budgets, but KTOS trades at premium valuations sensitive to execution, while LHX and RTX offer value with dividends. Sentiment tilts toward innovators like KTOS amid autonomy trends.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors KTOS based on trend consistency in unmanned growth, recent earnings beats, and superior relative positioning amid defense tech rotation. Probabilistic edges stem from 20%+ organic expansion and contract momentum, though higher volatility tempers conviction versus LHX's orders or RTX's stability.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KTOS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLHX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and RTX’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- KTOS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LHX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- RTX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KTOS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LHX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and RTX’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KTOS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LHX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RTX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
KTOS (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +1.52% price change this week, while LHX (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +0.55% , and RTX (@Aerospace & Defense) price fluctuated +3.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +4.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
KTOS is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2026.
LHX is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
RTX is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (+4.33% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| KTOS | LHX | RTX | |
| Capitalization | 12.8B | 66.9B | 273B |
| EBITDA | 103M | 3.75B | 14.9B |
| Gain YTD | -9.986 | 22.362 | 11.159 |
| P/E Ratio | 525.62 | 41.97 | 40.97 |
| Revenue | 1.35B | 21.9B | 88.6B |
| Total Cash | 561M | 1.07B | 7.44B |
| Total Debt | 146M | 11.1B | 39.5B |
KTOS | LHX | RTX | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 14 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 31 Undervalued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 25 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 75 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 43 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 20 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LHX's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as RTX (42) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KTOS (94) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that LHX's stock grew similarly to RTX’s and somewhat faster than KTOS’s over the last 12 months.
RTX's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as LHX (25) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KTOS (62) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that RTX's stock grew similarly to LHX’s and somewhat faster than KTOS’s over the last 12 months.
RTX's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as LHX (75) in the null industry, and is in the same range as KTOS (88) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that RTX's stock grew similarly to LHX’s and similarly to KTOS’s over the last 12 months.
RTX's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as LHX (43) in the null industry, and is in the same range as KTOS (56) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that RTX's stock grew similarly to LHX’s and similarly to KTOS’s over the last 12 months.
KTOS's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as LHX (20) in the null industry, and is in the same range as RTX (45) in the null industry. This means that KTOS's stock grew similarly to LHX’s and similarly to RTX’s over the last 12 months.
| KTOS | LHX | RTX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | N/A | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 72% | 11 days ago 51% | 11 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 33% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WGMI | 41.36 | 0.85 | +2.10% |
| CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF | |||
| ITOT | 148.89 | 0.82 | +0.55% |
| iShares Core S&P Total US Stock Mkt ETF | |||
| SIXP | 32.12 | 0.14 | +0.43% |
| AllianzIM US Equity 6M Bfr10 Mar/Sep ETF | |||
| HFSP | 15.60 | N/A | N/A |
| TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF | |||
| BUG | 24.62 | -1.41 | -5.42% |
| Global X Cybersecurity ETF | |||
KTOS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KTOS has been loosely correlated with KRMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KTOS jumps, then KRMN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KTOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTOS | 100% | -8.23% | ||
| KRMN - KTOS | 62% Loosely correlated | -4.02% | ||
| AVAV - KTOS | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.94% | ||
| DRS - KTOS | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| MRCY - KTOS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| HII - KTOS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
More | ||||
LHX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LHX has been loosely correlated with GD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LHX jumps, then GD could also see price increases.
RTX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RTX has been loosely correlated with NOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RTX jumps, then NOC could also see price increases.