KVUE
Price
$17.43
Change
+$0.09 (+0.52%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
33.41B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MDLZ
Price
$59.09
Change
+$0.26 (+0.44%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
75.84B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MNST
Price
$76.19
Change
+$1.05 (+1.40%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
74.51B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KVUE or MDLZ or MNST

Header iconKVUE vs MDLZ vs MNST Comparison
Open Charts KVUE vs MDLZ vs MNSTBanner chart's image
KVUE vs MDLZ vs MNST Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (KVUE: $17.43MDLZ: $59.09MNST: $76.19)
Brand notoriety: KVUE and MNST are not notable and MDLZ is notable
KVUE represents the Household/Personal Care industry, MDLZ is part of the Food: Specialty/Candy industry, and MNST is in the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KVUE: 105%, MDLZ: 70%, MNST: 88%
Market capitalization -- KVUE: $33.41B, MDLZ: $75.84B, MNST: $74.51B
KVUE [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $33.41B. MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $75.84B. MNST [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] has a market capitalization of $74.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $340.84B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $75.84B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $336.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $20.05B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $15.05B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $23.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KVUE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and MNST’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KVUE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNST is a better buy in the long-term than MDLZ, which in turn is a better option than KVUE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KVUE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and MNST’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KVUE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the short-term than MNST, which in turn is a better option than KVUE.

Price Growth

KVUE (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.69% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.69% , and MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price fluctuated +5.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.71%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.38%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164976.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

KVUE is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2026.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

MNST is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+2.02% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.89% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+2.02% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDLZ($75.8B) and MNST($74.5B) has a higher market cap than KVUE($33.4B). MNST has higher P/E ratio than MDLZ and KVUE: MNST (39.27) vs MDLZ (31.26) and KVUE (22.93). MDLZ YTD gains are higher at: 10.722 vs. KVUE (2.201) and MNST (-0.626). MDLZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.97B vs. KVUE (2.99B) and MNST (2.53B). MNST has less debt than KVUE and MDLZ: MNST (199M) vs KVUE (8.67B) and MDLZ (21.8B). MDLZ has higher revenues than KVUE and MNST: MDLZ (38.5B) vs KVUE (15.1B) and MNST (8.29B).
KVUEMDLZMNST
Capitalization33.4B75.8B74.5B
EBITDA2.99B4.97B2.53B
Gain YTD2.20110.722-0.626
P/E Ratio22.9331.2639.27
Revenue15.1B38.5B8.29B
Total Cash1.06BN/A2.77B
Total Debt8.67B21.8B199M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MDLZ vs MNST: Fundamental Ratings
MDLZ
MNST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1973
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7123
SMR RATING
1..100
7134
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1859
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDLZ's Valuation (28) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (92) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's SMR Rating (34) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MDLZ (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (59) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KVUEMDLZMNST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KVUE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MDLZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQQS36.040.41
+1.16%
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
DHDG34.130.13
+0.38%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Qt 2.5 to 15 Buffr ETF
NKX12.160.03
+0.25%
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
IBIE26.22N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term Tips ETF
AMLP52.36-0.15
-0.29%
Alerian MLP ETF

KVUE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KVUE has been loosely correlated with KMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KVUE jumps, then KMB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KVUE
1D Price
Change %
KVUE100%
+0.52%
KMB - KVUE
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
CL - KVUE
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
PG - KVUE
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
UL - KVUE
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
CLX - KVUE
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
+0.44%
GIS - MDLZ
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
CAG - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
CPB - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
KHC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
MKC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
More

MNST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNST
1D Price
Change %
MNST100%
+1.40%
CCEP - MNST
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
KO - MNST
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
PEP - MNST
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
CELH - MNST
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
KDP - MNST
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.24%
More