This comparison examines LMT (Lockheed Martin), RKLB (Rocket Lab), and RTX (RTX Corporation), key players in the aerospace and defense sector amid rising geopolitical tensions and space commercialization. These stocks span mature defense contractors and innovative launch providers, offering insights into stability versus growth. Traders seeking momentum in volatile conditions and long-term investors eyeing backlogs and contracts will find value in their relative performance, valuation sensitivity, and exposure to missiles, aircraft, and satellites. Recent contract wins and production ramps highlight their positioning in a market prioritizing national security technologies.
Lockheed Martin (LMT), a global leader in aerospace and defense, operates through segments including Aeronautics (F-35 fighters), Missiles and Fire Control, Rotary and Mission Systems, and Space. With a market cap near $140 billion and trailing P/E of about 28, it reported 2025 sales of $75 billion and a record $194 billion backlog. In recent weeks, shares experienced volatility, dipping around 8% over 30 days amid broader market pressures, yet YTD gains exceed 24% and 1-year returns top 35%. Sentiment has been bolstered by a framework agreement quadrupling Precision Strike Missile production and participation in U.S. Space Force exercises, underscoring demand for its combat-proven systems. These developments, alongside Pentagon munitions deals, have reinforced its defensive positioning despite short-term price corrections.
Rocket Lab (RKLB), an end-to-end space company, focuses on Launch Services (Electron rocket) and Space Systems (satellites, components). Valued at over $30 billion with negative earnings reflecting growth investments, it achieved its 84th Electron launch recently and secured a $190 million DoD hypersonic contract, pushing backlog to $1.85 billion (73% YoY growth). Shares surged over 200% in the past year but pulled back 15-17% in recent weeks and YTD flat to negative amid Neutron rocket delays and market concerns. Positive catalysts include its first European Space Agency mission and constellation management demand, driving sentiment toward high-upside potential despite execution risks in the competitive small-launch market.
RTX Corporation (RTX), formerly Raytheon Technologies, spans Collins Aerospace, Pratt & Whitney engines, and Raytheon defense systems, with a market cap over $250 billion and P/E around 38. Recent activity includes $6.6 billion F135 engine contracts, $3.8 billion F-35 modifications, and a $115 million Alabama missile facility expansion. Shares traded steadily around $187, with 1-year gains near 45% and modest YTD advances, showing resilience versus peers' dips in recent market activity. Analysts project 5.4% sales and 8.3% EPS growth for 2026, fueled by air/missile defense demand like Patriot systems, though supply chain hurdles temper near-term momentum.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from over 350 AI trading bots that scan thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—from price action and deep learning to pattern recognition—across timeframes like 5-minute, 15-minute, and 60-minute charts, with recent top agents delivering annualized returns up to 171% over 30 days and win rates exceeding 90% in select portfolios. Only the most suitable for prevailing conditions, such as volatile defense sectors, earn a spot in this dynamic leaderboard of 25+ bots. Stats highlight low-drawdown performers in aerospace (up to 192% annualized) and multi-asset plays, appealing to traders seeking automated edges. Explore Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligned with current market trends.
LMT, RKLB, and RTX operate in aerospace/defense but diverge in models: LMT and RTX emphasize integrated platforms (F-35, Patriot) with massive backlogs ($194B, strong pipeline), while RKLB chases commercial/military launches and satellites. Growth drivers include geopolitical demand for missiles/hypersonics favoring all, but RKLB's Neutron offers scalability at higher risk versus incumbents' steady contracts. Recent momentum: LMT leads YTD (~24%), RTX stable, RKLB volatile post-surge. Risks contrast RKLB's losses/execution with profitable peers; valuations reflect RKLB's 50x P/S premium. Sentiment tilts to defense giants amid tensions, trading growth for reliability.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors LMT due to unmatched backlog stability, consistent trends, and catalysts like missile ramps positioning it ahead in relative performance. Probabilistic advantages arise from lower volatility and earnings reliability versus RKLB's growth risks and RTX's moderate momentum, though sector shifts could elevate peers.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LMT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRKLB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and RTX’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LMT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RKLB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and RTX’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LMT (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -6.20% price change this week, while RKLB (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +26.68% , and RTX (@Aerospace & Defense) price fluctuated -2.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +4.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.91%.
LMT is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.
RTX is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2026.
Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| LMT | RKLB | RTX | |
| Capitalization | 134B | 51.7B | 264B |
| EBITDA | 8.73B | -155.47M | 14.9B |
| Gain YTD | 20.815 | 28.240 | 7.110 |
| P/E Ratio | 27.05 | N/A | 39.47 |
| Revenue | 75B | 602M | 88.6B |
| Total Cash | 4.12B | 1.02B | 7.44B |
| Total Debt | 21.7B | 254M | 39.5B |
LMT | RTX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LMT's Valuation (13) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as RTX (34) in the null industry. This means that LMT’s stock grew similarly to RTX’s over the last 12 months.
RTX's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as LMT (36) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that RTX’s stock grew similarly to LMT’s over the last 12 months.
LMT's SMR Rating (14) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RTX (67) in the null industry. This means that LMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than RTX’s over the last 12 months.
RTX's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as LMT (52) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that RTX’s stock grew similarly to LMT’s over the last 12 months.
LMT's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as RTX (52) in the null industry. This means that LMT’s stock grew similarly to RTX’s over the last 12 months.
| LMT | RKLB | RTX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 54% | 1 day ago 86% | 16 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 15 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 32% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PSCI | 170.71 | 0.35 | +0.21% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF | |||
| GIGB | 46.21 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Acss Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF | |||
| XTOC | 34.73 | -0.07 | -0.20% |
| Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF™ Oct | |||
| IVW | 127.70 | -0.62 | -0.48% |
| iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | |||
| AFGE | 16.64 | -0.13 | -0.78% |
| American Financial Group | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RKLB has been closely correlated with LUNR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RKLB jumps, then LUNR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RKLB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RKLB | 100% | +5.50% | ||
| LUNR - RKLB | 68% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| RDW - RKLB | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| ACHR - RKLB | 54% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RCAT - RKLB | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| KRMN - RKLB | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
More | ||||