LSCC
Price
$117.06
Change
+$5.18 (+4.63%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
16.02B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RMBS
Price
$126.93
Change
+$6.90 (+5.75%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
13.72B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMTC
Price
$107.71
Change
+$5.27 (+5.14%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.01B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LSCC or RMBS or SMTC

Header iconLSCC vs RMBS vs SMTC Comparison
Open Charts LSCC vs RMBS vs SMTCBanner chart's image
LSCC vs RMBS vs SMTC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) vs Rambus (RMBS) vs Semtech (SMTC) Earnings Recap: Recent Results Signal Semiconductor Strength

Key Takeaways

  • Semtech (SMTC) reported Q4 FY2026 revenue of $274.4 million, beating estimates, with non-GAAP EPS of $0.44 versus $0.43 expected.
  • Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) delivered Q4 FY2025 revenue of $145.8 million, up 24.2% YoY, non-GAAP EPS $0.32 in line with consensus.
  • Rambus (RMBS) posted Q4 FY2025 revenue of $190.2 million, record product revenue $96.8 million, non-GAAP EPS $0.68 meeting expectations.
  • All three showed robust data center and AI-driven growth, with expanding margins and positive guidance.
  • SMTC leads in revenue scale, while LSCC and RMBS highlight FPGA and memory interface strength.

Earnings Context and Competitive Landscape

These companies operate in the semiconductor space, focusing on connectivity, signal integrity, and programmable logic critical for data centers, AI, and edge computing. LSCC specializes in low-power FPGAs, RMBS in memory interface chips and IP, and SMTC in analog and mixed-signal solutions for infrastructure. Recent earnings reflect surging demand for AI accelerators and high-speed networking, with overlaps in data center applications driving competitive dynamics.

Semtech Focus

Semtech (SMTC) released Q4 FY2026 results on March 16, 2026, for the quarter ended January 25, 2026. Net sales hit a record $274.4 million, up 9% YoY and beating consensus by 0.5%. Non-GAAP gross margin was 51.6%, operating margin 18.2%, with non-GAAP EPS of $0.44 surpassing $0.43 estimates. Full FY2026 sales reached $1.05 billion, up 15% YoY, non-GAAP EPS $1.71. Data center sales drove growth, bolstered by acquisitions like HieFo for optical tech. Q1 FY2027 guidance: $283 million revenue, $0.45 EPS.

Lattice Semiconductor Context

Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) reported Q4 FY2025 on February 10, 2026, for period ended January 3, 2026. Revenue was $145.8 million, +24.2% YoY and +9.3% QoQ, exceeding $143.2 million estimates. Non-GAAP gross margin 69.4%, operating income $44.8 million, EPS $0.32 meeting forecasts. Full year revenue $523.3 million. Communications & Computing hit records, AI servers up 85%. Q1 FY2026 guidance: $158-172 million revenue, EPS $0.34-0.38.

Rambus Context

Rambus (RMBS) announced Q4 FY2025 on February 2, 2026, ended December 31, 2025. Total revenue $190.2 million, product revenue record $96.8 million (+32% YoY), licensing $71.5 million. Non-GAAP EPS $0.68 in line, GAAP $0.58. Full year product revenue $347.8 million, +41% YoY. DDR5 RCDs captured mid-40% market share. Cash from operations $99.8 million. Strong positioning in memory interfaces for AI and data centers.

Head-to-Head Earnings and Market Comparison

Semtech (SMTC) posted highest revenue but moderate margins; non-GAAP operating margin 18.2% trails peers. Lattice (LSCC) excels in profitability with 69.4% gross margin and 30.7% operating margin, signaling premium FPGA pricing power. Rambus (RMBS) balances IP royalties and products effectively. Growth signals strongest at SMTC (15% FY), risks from supply chains noted by RMBS. Investor sentiment favors AI exposure, with all showing beats or meets and upbeat guidance.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the strongest AI bots from a larger pool of hundreds of bots trading thousands of tickers. It highlights top performers based on recent profitability, win rates, and consistency across various strategies. Bots vary by timeframe (intraday, swing, long-term), style (momentum, mean reversion, trend-following), and performance metrics like annualized returns, Sharpe ratio, and drawdown. Users can explore, backtest, and deploy these AI-driven trading signals for stocks including semiconductors like LSCC, RMBS, and SMTC. The page updates dynamically to showcase evolving leaders, aiding data-driven investment decisions without emotional bias.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron AI favors Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC) with 65% probability due to superior margins (69% gross), AI/data center momentum (servers +85%), and Q1 guidance beating consensus by 37% YoY growth at midpoint. SMTC (25%) shows scale but lower profitability; RMBS (10%) solid but supply risks noted.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 18, 2026
Stock price -- (LSCC: $117.06RMBS: $126.82SMTC: $107.71)
Brand notoriety: RMBS and SMTC are not notable and LSCC is notable
The three companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSCC: 148%, RMBS: 131%, SMTC: 165%
Market capitalization -- LSCC: $16.02B, RMBS: $13.72B, SMTC: $10.01B
$LSCC is valued at $16.02B, while RMBS has a market capitalization of $13.72B, and SMTC's market capitalization is $10.01B. The market cap for tickers in this @Semiconductors ranges from $4.9T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Semiconductors industry is $122.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and SMTC’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LSCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMTC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the long-term than LSCC, which in turn is a better option than SMTC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSCC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and SMTC’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LSCC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMTC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LSCC is a better buy in the short-term than RMBS and SMTC.

Price Growth

LSCC (@Semiconductors) experienced а +10.33% price change this week, while RMBS (@Semiconductors) price change was +14.83% , and SMTC (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +26.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +11.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

LSCC is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2026.

SMTC is expected to report earnings on Jun 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+11.63% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LSCC($16B) has a higher market cap than RMBS($13.7B) and SMTC($10B). LSCC has higher P/E ratio than SMTC and RMBS: LSCC (5853.00) vs SMTC (130.81) and RMBS (60.10). LSCC YTD gains are higher at: 59.092 vs. SMTC (46.166) and RMBS (38.013). RMBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 325M vs. LSCC (57.6M) and SMTC (39.5M). RMBS has more cash in the bank: 762M vs. SMTC (195M) and LSCC (134M). RMBS has less debt than LSCC and SMTC: RMBS (25M) vs LSCC (42.1M) and SMTC (497M). SMTC has higher revenues than RMBS and LSCC: SMTC (1.05B) vs RMBS (708M) and LSCC (523M).
LSCCRMBSSMTC
Capitalization16B13.7B10B
EBITDA57.6M325M39.5M
Gain YTD59.09238.01346.166
P/E Ratio5853.0060.10130.81
Revenue523M708M1.05B
Total Cash134M762M195M
Total Debt42.1M25M497M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LSCC vs RMBS vs SMTC: Fundamental Ratings
LSCC
RMBS
SMTC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
212123
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
422072
SMR RATING
1..100
894692
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
363735
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11128
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
445050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMBS's Valuation (79) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as SMTC (84) and is in the same range as LSCC (99). This means that RMBS's stock grew similarly to SMTC’s and similarly to LSCC’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as LSCC (42) and is somewhat better than the same rating for SMTC (72). This means that RMBS's stock grew similarly to LSCC’s and somewhat faster than SMTC’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's SMR Rating (46) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSCC (89) and is somewhat better than the same rating for SMTC (92). This means that RMBS's stock grew somewhat faster than LSCC’s and somewhat faster than SMTC’s over the last 12 months.

SMTC's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as LSCC (36) and is in the same range as RMBS (37). This means that SMTC's stock grew similarly to LSCC’s and similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

LSCC's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as RMBS (11) and is in the same range as SMTC (28). This means that LSCC's stock grew similarly to RMBS’s and similarly to SMTC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSCCRMBSSMTC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LSCC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RMBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMTC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMET45.980.71
+1.57%
VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF
QQEW136.681.58
+1.17%
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Sel Eql Wght ETF
CAF18.170.14
+0.78%
Morgan Stanley China A Share Fund
SDEM33.900.25
+0.75%
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® Em Mkts ETF
FFUT57.14-1.01
-1.74%
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
+5.66%
LRCX - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+2.54%
AMKR - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+7.11%
KLIC - RMBS
76%
Closely correlated
+2.79%
VECO - RMBS
75%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
KLAC - RMBS
74%
Closely correlated
+3.26%
More

SMTC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMTC has been closely correlated with MTSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMTC jumps, then MTSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMTC
1D Price
Change %
SMTC100%
+5.14%
MTSI - SMTC
66%
Closely correlated
+5.95%
MPWR - SMTC
65%
Loosely correlated
+4.67%
MXL - SMTC
62%
Loosely correlated
+12.51%
NXPI - SMTC
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
TSEM - SMTC
56%
Loosely correlated
+5.44%
More