MCHP
Price
$71.56
Change
+$0.34 (+0.48%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
38.72B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NVTS
Price
$9.54
Change
+$0.12 (+1.27%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RMBS
Price
$110.44
Change
+$4.86 (+4.60%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
11.95B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCHP or NVTS or RMBS

Header iconMCHP vs NVTS vs RMBS Comparison
Open Charts MCHP vs NVTS vs RMBSBanner chart's image
MCHP vs NVTS vs RMBS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) vs. Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS) vs. Rambus Inc. (RMBS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MCHP shows stable recovery with recent product expansions in SiC power modules and cybersecurity, amid a 1-month decline but positive 1-year gains of 27%.
  • NVTS exhibits high volatility and strong YTD momentum at 23%, driven by AI data center SiC innovations, though unprofitable with negative earnings.
  • RMBS leads in AI memory with HBM4E IP launch, delivering 61% 1-year returns and profitability, but faces recent share pullbacks.
  • MCHP boasts the largest scale with $4.4B revenue and $40B market cap, contrasting NVTS's $46M revenue and $2B cap.
  • All three benefit from semiconductor demand in AI and power efficiency, but RMBS and NVTS show sharper AI catalysts versus MCHP's broader embedded focus.
  • Recent market activity highlights growth trade-offs: stability in MCHP, momentum in NVTS, and IP-driven positioning in RMBS.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines MCHP, NVTS, and RMBS, three semiconductor firms navigating AI-driven demand for power management, memory interfaces, and embedded controls. Investors seeking exposure to high-growth areas like data centers and efficient computing will find value in analyzing their relative performance, as recent innovations in SiC, GaN, and HBM technologies underscore sector momentum. Traders focused on short-term catalysts versus long-term stability can use this overview to gauge market positioning amid broader chip recovery trends.

MCHP Overview and Recent Performance

Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) designs smart, connected embedded control solutions, including microcontrollers, analog products, and memory for automotive, industrial, and connectivity applications. In recent market activity, shares have faced pressure with a roughly 18% 1-month drop amid broader sector volatility, yet YTD performance holds near flat at -0.6%, outperforming some peers on a 1-year basis with 27% gains. Key influences include new BZPACK mSiC power modules for harsh environments and Trust Platform expansions for cybersecurity compliance, signaling recovery in bookings and end-market demand. Analysts note improving sequential sales growth projections, supporting sentiment amid inventory normalization.

NVTS Overview and Recent Performance

Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS) specializes in GaN and SiC power semiconductors for mobile, data centers, EVs, and consumer electronics. Recent weeks have shown volatility, with shares surging on AI data center announcements like 1200V SiC packages and an 800V-6V power board at NVIDIA GTC, contributing to 23% YTD gains and explosive 276% 1-year returns. A new CFO appointment bolstered sentiment, though the firm remains unprofitable. High-power market pivots, including GaN sampling for AI, drive optimism despite revenue declines in recent quarters, positioning it for sequential growth in 2026.

RMBS Overview and Recent Performance

Rambus Inc. (RMBS) provides memory interface chips, silicon IP, and security solutions for AI, data centers, and automotive. Shares have pulled back around 12% recently from peaks, with YTD near flat at 0.2%, but 61% 1-year gains reflect strong fundamentals. Recent HBM4E Memory Controller IP sets AI benchmarks, amid Q4 revenue beats and record product sales. Supply concerns tempered guidance, yet profitability and $762M cash bolster resilience, with focus shifting to DDR5 and high-speed interfaces fueling market sentiment.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend trading, price action, and multi-agent systems, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Performance stats shine: annualized returns range from 15% to 188%, win rates 56-89%, and profit factors 1.6-12.2, often in semiconductors (e.g., SOXL at 100% return), aerospace, and AI-related sectors. Ideal for current volatility, they highlight bots suited to market conditions. Explore Trending AI Robots to copy top performers and enhance your trading edge.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MCHP, NVTS, and RMBS operate in semiconductors but diverge in focus: MCHP's broad embedded microcontrollers contrast NVTS's power-efficient GaN/SiC for AI/EVs and RMBS's memory IP/security. Growth drivers favor NVTS and RMBS via AI catalysts, while MCHP offers scale ($4.4B revenue vs. $46M/$708M). Recent momentum peaks at NVTS (23% YTD), with RMBS stable and profitable (P/E ~43x), MCHP higher (~86x), and NVTS negative. Risks include NVTS's losses/competition, RMBS's supply issues, and MCHP's inventory cycles. Valuation sensitivity ties to AI exposure, with RMBS most directly benefiting.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors RMBS due to its consistent profitability, strong AI memory catalysts like HBM4E, and relative stability amid recent pullbacks. With superior trend positioning and lower volatility versus NVTS's swings, alongside MCHP's scale but softer momentum, RMBS aligns best with observable factors like revenue beats and sector tailwinds, suggesting higher probability of outperformance in the near term.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2026
Stock price -- (MCHP: $71.56NVTS: $9.54RMBS: $110.44)
Brand notoriety: NVTS and RMBS are not notable and MCHP is notable
The three companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCHP: 117%, NVTS: 84%, RMBS: 120%
Market capitalization -- MCHP: $38.72B, NVTS: $2.2B, RMBS: $11.95B
$MCHP is valued at $38.72B, while NVTS has a market capitalization of $2.2B, and RMBS's market capitalization is $11.95B. The market cap for tickers in this @Semiconductors ranges from $4.58T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Semiconductors industry is $113.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCHP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNVTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and RMBS’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCHP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NVTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the long-term than MCHP, which in turn is a better option than NVTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCHP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and RMBS’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCHP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NVTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NVTS is a better buy in the short-term than MCHP, which in turn is a better option than RMBS.

Price Growth

MCHP (@Semiconductors) experienced а +9.09% price change this week, while NVTS (@Semiconductors) price change was +8.41% , and RMBS (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +18.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +6.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCHP is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.

NVTS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2026.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+6.73% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHP($38.7B) has a higher market cap than RMBS($11.9B) and NVTS($2.2B). NVTS YTD gains are higher at: 33.613 vs. RMBS (20.187) and MCHP (12.965). MCHP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 877M vs. RMBS (325M) and NVTS (-67.33M). RMBS has more cash in the bank: 762M vs. MCHP (251M) and NVTS (237M). NVTS has less debt than RMBS and MCHP: NVTS (6.47M) vs RMBS (25M) and MCHP (5.41B). MCHP has higher revenues than RMBS and NVTS: MCHP (4.37B) vs RMBS (708M) and NVTS (45.9M).
MCHPNVTSRMBS
Capitalization38.7B2.2B11.9B
EBITDA877M-67.33M325M
Gain YTD12.96533.61320.187
P/E Ratio86.21N/A52.34
Revenue4.37B45.9M708M
Total Cash251M237M762M
Total Debt5.41B6.47M25M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHP vs RMBS: Fundamental Ratings
MCHP
RMBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2217
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9325
SMR RATING
1..100
9046
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
614
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCHP's Valuation (13) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMBS (79). This means that MCHP’s stock grew significantly faster than RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHP (93). This means that RMBS’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHP’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's SMR Rating (46) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHP (90). This means that RMBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHP’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MCHP (44). This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to MCHP’s over the last 12 months.

MCHP's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as RMBS (14). This means that MCHP’s stock grew similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCHPNVTSRMBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCHP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NVTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RMBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFIS35.490.15
+0.42%
Dimensional International Small Cap ETF
NSCR29.81N/A
N/A
Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF
DVXC25.38N/A
N/A
WEBs Communication Svcs XLC Dfnd Vol ETF
MOOD41.61-0.02
-0.05%
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allc ETF
YLD18.92-0.09
-0.47%
Principal Active High Yield ETF

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
+4.60%
LRCX - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
AMKR - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+5.11%
KLIC - RMBS
76%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
VECO - RMBS
75%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
KLAC - RMBS
74%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
More