This stock comparison examines MCHP, QCOM, and TSM, three key players in the semiconductor industry pivotal to embedded systems, wireless connectivity, and advanced chip manufacturing. Investors and traders focused on technology sector relative performance will find value in analyzing their business models, recent market activity, and positioning amid AI demand surges and cyclical pressures. With semiconductors driving innovation in automotive, IoT, and high-performance computing, understanding momentum shifts and risk factors aids informed decision-making in volatile conditions.
Microchip Technology (MCHP) specializes in smart, connected embedded control solutions, including microcontrollers, analog products, and FPGAs for industrial, automotive, and consumer markets. Trading around $63.78 with a $34.5B market cap, the stock reflects mixed recent market activity. In recent weeks, MCHP has shown recovery signals, posting 15.6% year-over-year revenue growth driven by portfolio expansion and raised Q3 guidance on strong bookings. However, high inventory levels and valuation concerns have prompted investor exits, like Madison Mid Cap Fund's position closure, contributing to short-term pressure and YTD gains of just 0.68%. Sentiment hinges on inventory normalization and end-market recovery.
Qualcomm (QCOM) develops wireless technologies, including chipsets for mobile, automotive, and IoT via its QCT segment, complemented by QTL licensing. At $129.39 with a $138B market cap and 26.09 P/E, the stock has underperformed YTD by -23.62%. Recent weeks brought analyst downgrades to Sell, citing smartphone market contraction, competition, and memory shortages impacting handset volumes. Despite automotive AI partnerships like Wayve, weak guidance and estimate cuts have driven declines, with shares lagging the sector amid softening upgrade cycles and reduced orders.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) pioneered the pure-play foundry model, fabricating advanced chips for clients like Apple and Nvidia across high-performance computing, smartphones, and automotive. Priced at $340.23 with a $1.765T market cap and 32.75 P/E, it boasts 13.57% YTD and 98% one-year returns. Recent market activity underscores AI strength, with 30% revenue jumps from infrastructure build-out. Analysts see 20% upside despite geopolitical risks, fueled by demand for leading-edge nodes; minor pullbacks reflect broader volatility, but catalysts like capacity expansions sustain positive sentiment.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, each designed to trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. AI analyzes over 351 bots to spotlight 25 trending ones suited to current volatility, featuring annualized returns from +18% to +208%, win rates of 52-95%, and profit factors up to 25.83. Examples include semiconductor-focused bots like SOXL 15min (+95% return, 70% win rate) and multi-ticker strategies blending semis, energy, and aerospace (+130% return, 62% win rate). These vary from swing trading to hedging, with drawdowns managed via real-time signals. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligning with your style.
MCHP, QCOM, and TSM operate in semiconductors but diverge in models: MCHP's embedded focus yields stable industrial/automotive exposure, contrasting QCOM's wireless reliance vulnerable to smartphone cycles. TSM's foundry neutrality captures broadest growth from AI/HPC. Recent momentum favors TSM (98% 1Y return) over MCHP (23% 1Y) and QCOM (-13% 1Y). Risks include TSM's geopolitics, QCOM's competition, and MCHP's inventory. Valuation sensitivity shows TSM premium for catalysts, while QCOM trades cheaper amid downgrades. Market sentiment tilts to TSM's stability versus peers' end-market trade-offs.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors TSM due to superior trend consistency, AI catalyst momentum, and relative positioning with 30% revenue growth outpacing peers. While MCHP offers recovery potential and QCOM valuation appeal, TSM's scale and broad exposure suggest higher probability of outperformance in the prevailing semiconductor upcycle.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MCHP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQCOM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and TSM’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MCHP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QCOM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and TSM’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MCHP (@Semiconductors) experienced а +8.57% price change this week, while QCOM (@Semiconductors) price change was +0.75% , and TSM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +7.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.
MCHP is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.
QCOM is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.
TSM is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.
The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| MCHP | QCOM | TSM | |
| Capitalization | 38.5B | 136B | 1.59T |
| EBITDA | 877M | 14.8B | 2.74T |
| Gain YTD | 12.428 | -24.835 | 20.944 |
| P/E Ratio | 86.21 | 25.76 | 35.22 |
| Revenue | 4.37B | 44.9B | 3.81T |
| Total Cash | 251M | 11.8B | N/A |
| Total Debt | 5.41B | 14.8B | N/A |
MCHP | QCOM | TSM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 53 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 8 Undervalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 89 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 42 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 63 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 16 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QCOM's Valuation (8) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as MCHP (13) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for TSM (49) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that QCOM's stock grew similarly to MCHP’s and somewhat faster than TSM’s over the last 12 months.
TSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for QCOM (89) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MCHP (92) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TSM's stock grew significantly faster than QCOM’s and significantly faster than MCHP’s over the last 12 months.
TSM's SMR Rating (26) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as QCOM (42) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHP (90) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TSM's stock grew similarly to QCOM’s and somewhat faster than MCHP’s over the last 12 months.
TSM's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MCHP (41) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as QCOM (63) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that TSM's stock grew similarly to MCHP’s and similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
MCHP's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as QCOM (16) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry, and is in the same range as TSM (20) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that MCHP's stock grew similarly to QCOM’s and similarly to TSM’s over the last 12 months.
| MCHP | QCOM | TSM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 75% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | N/A | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 64% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 73% | 21 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 59% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FNGG | 175.96 | 3.80 | +2.21% |
| Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | |||
| ZAP | 33.46 | 0.42 | +1.27% |
| Global X U.S. Electrification ETF | |||
| CGBL | 35.80 | 0.14 | +0.39% |
| Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | |||
| NSCR | 29.81 | N/A | N/A |
| Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF | |||
| CONL | 6.53 | -0.48 | -6.85% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF | |||