This comparison examines MDLZ, MNST, and MO, three stalwarts in consumer defensive sectors—snacks, energy beverages, and tobacco. Investors seeking stability amid market swings, income via dividends, or growth in essentials may find value here. Recent performance reflects resilience against input costs and economic pressures, with relative momentum varying by growth profile and yield appeal. Traders eyeing stock comparison for positioning will note contrasts in valuation sensitivity and sector tailwinds.
Mondelez International (MDLZ) is a global leader in snacks, biscuits, chocolate, and confectionery, with brands like Oreo and Cadbury generating ~$36 billion in annual revenue across 150+ countries. In recent market activity, the stock around $58 has hovered near its 52-week midpoint amid YTD gains of ~8%. Elevated cocoa prices and cautious M&A outlook due to high acquisition costs have pressured margins, despite 5.1% organic revenue growth. Sentiment reflects pricing strategies offsetting inputs, with a forward P/E of ~19 and 3.4% dividend yield supporting defensive positioning.
Monster Beverage (MNST) develops and markets energy drinks like Monster Energy, alongside strategic brands, operating internationally from Corona, CA. Recent weeks saw shares near $76 dip ~9% post-Q4 earnings, despite 17.6% net sales rise to $2.13 billion and 64.9% net income per share growth. YTD slightly down at -1%, but one-year up 37%, buoyed by international expansion and institutional interest. Cost pressures linger, yet gross margins at 55.85% underscore profitability; no dividend, P/E elevated on growth expectations.
Altria Group (MO) dominates U.S. tobacco with Marlboro cigarettes, oral products like on!, and smokeless brands, plus e-vapor via NJOY. Shares near $67 have surged ~16% YTD, outperforming peers, fueled by strong oral nicotine growth and Barclays' price target hike to $63. Dividend yield ~6.1% attracts income seekers, with P/E ~14 signaling value. Recent stability amid sector shifts to reduced-risk products bolsters sentiment, with adjusted EPS growth projected.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, each trading thousands of tickers with diverse styles, strategies, timeframes like 5-min to 60-min, and performance metrics. Selected by AI for current market conditions, they boast annualized returns up to +220%, win rates to 94.92%, and profit factors to 25.83—such as AeroDefense ITA at +32% return/80% win rate or USAR/SMR/CIFR at +220%/76% win rate. These bots employ technical/fundamental analyses across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, with risk controls and no minimum balance for signals. Explore Tickeron’s full suite to identify bots suited to volatile conditions and copy top performers for potential edge in stock comparison trading.
MDLZ, MNST, and MO span consumer defensive realms: snacks (MDLZ biscuits/chocolate), non-alcoholic beverages (MNST energy drinks), and tobacco (MO cigarettes/oral). Growth drivers differ—MDLZ via global emerging markets, MNST international expansion, MO smoke-free shifts—yet all battle input costs. Recent momentum favors MO (16% YTD) over MDLZ (8%) and MNST (-1%), with risk factors including commodity volatility for MDLZ/MNST and regulation for MO. Sector exposure yields stability, but MO's 6.1% yield trumps MDLZ's 3.4% (MNST none); valuations show MNST premium P/E on growth, MO discount ~14x, MDLZ ~31x sensitive to earnings. Sentiment tilts to MO's income appeal versus MNST's upside trade-offs.
Tickeron’s AI would lean toward MO in the current environment, given superior YTD momentum, high yield stability, and oral nicotine catalysts amid defensive positioning. Relative strength and lower valuation enhance probabilistic edge over MDLZ's cost pressures or MNST's post-earnings volatility, though all merit monitoring for trend shifts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MDLZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and MO’s FA Score reflects 5 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MDLZ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and MO’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +2.69% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +5.28% , and MO (@Tobacco) price fluctuated +2.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.38%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164976.25%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.40%.
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
MO is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+2.02% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Tobacco (+1.70% weekly)The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.
| MDLZ | MNST | MO | |
| Capitalization | 75.8B | 74.5B | 113B |
| EBITDA | 4.97B | 2.53B | 10.8B |
| Gain YTD | 10.722 | -0.626 | 18.957 |
| P/E Ratio | 31.26 | 39.27 | 16.37 |
| Revenue | 38.5B | 8.29B | 20.1B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.77B | N/A |
| Total Debt | 21.8B | 199M | 25.7B |
MDLZ | MNST | MO | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 73 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 92 Overvalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 23 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | 34 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 51 | 29 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 59 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MO's Valuation (10) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as MDLZ (28) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MNST (92) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and significantly faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MO's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as MNST (23) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MO's SMR Rating (9) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as MNST (34) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MO's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as MNST (51) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as MDLZ (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MO's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as MDLZ (18) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (59) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
| MDLZ | MNST | MO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 61% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 49% | 11 days ago 46% | 9 days ago 37% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 20% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PJUN | 42.61 | 0.14 | +0.33% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-Jun | |||
| NDVG | 33.68 | N/A | N/A |
| Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF | |||
| TLH | 100.86 | -0.08 | -0.08% |
| iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | |||
| TVC | 24.43 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1998 Series D due June 1 2028 | |||
| EPHE | 25.67 | -0.04 | -0.16% |
| iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZ | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| GIS - MDLZ | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| CAG - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| CPB - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| KHC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| MKC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +1.40% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MO has been loosely correlated with PM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MO jumps, then PM could also see price increases.