Advertisement
MDLZ or MNST or WMT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Mondelez International (MDLZ) vs. Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Walmart (WMT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- MDLZ has shown year-to-date gains of around 5%, but recent market activity reflects caution amid mixed analyst views and post-earnings softness.
- MNST delivered strong Q4 results with 17.6% net sales growth, yet shares dipped post-earnings due to cost pressures, trading with mixed short-term momentum.
- WMT leads with YTD returns near 12% and robust long-term performance, supported by e-commerce growth and resilient consumer demand.
- Relative performance highlights WMT's stability in retail, contrasting MDLZ and MNST's consumer staples volatility tied to input costs and sector sentiment.
- Valuation metrics show higher P/E for MNST (49x) versus WMT (45x), with MDLZ facing growth challenges in recent weeks.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines MDLZ, MNST, and WMT—key players in consumer staples and retail. MDLZ leads in snacks, MNST dominates energy drinks, and WMT anchors discount retailing. Traders seeking defensive exposure amid volatility and investors eyeing relative performance in staples will find value here. Recent market shifts, including earnings reactions and sector rotations, underscore contrasts in momentum, growth drivers, and risk profiles for informed positioning.
MDLZ Overview and Recent Performance
Mondelez International (MDLZ), a global leader in snacks with brands like Oreo and Cadbury, generates about $36 billion in annual revenue across biscuits, chocolate, and emerging baked snacks. Operating in over 80 countries with 91,000 employees, it holds top positions in key categories. Recent market activity has seen shares down around 1.2% post-earnings, with YTD gains at 5.11% but a one-year decline of 14%. Mixed analyst sentiments, cautious 2026 forecasts, and challenges in organic growth amid competitive pressures have tempered sentiment. Investments like a CHF 65 million Toblerone line signal long-term focus, yet near-term volatility persists.
MNST Overview and Recent Performance
Monster Beverage (MNST), headquartered in Corona, California, specializes in energy drinks like Monster Energy and Reign, alongside strategic brands and alcohol beverages. With 5,773 employees, it commands a significant share of the $86 billion global energy drink market. Q4 2025 results shone with 17.6% net sales growth to $2.13 billion and 64.9% EPS rise, yet shares fell 9% post-earnings due to tariff concerns, inflation, and rising costs like aluminum. Recent weeks show mixed trends: three-month gains but monthly dips, with YTD slightly negative and one-year up 37%. Leadership changes support international push amid valuation debates.
WMT Overview and Recent Performance
Walmart (WMT), the world's largest retailer, operates over 10,750 stores in 19 countries, serving 270 million weekly customers with $681 billion in FY2025 revenue and 2.1 million associates. Spanning supercenters, e-commerce, and Sam's Club, it excels in groceries, health, and omnichannel sales. Shares have gained 10.5% over three months, YTD 12.31%, and 43.84% annually, outperforming peers. Recent strength stems from 24% e-commerce growth, market share in higher-income segments, and resilient demand, though valuation concerns linger at elevated multiples. Momentum reflects defensive appeal in uncertain conditions.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from hundreds of AI trading bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles like swing trading, trend following, and hedging. Only those excelling in current market conditions—leveraging volatility, sector rotations, and momentum—earn a spot. Featured bots show annualized returns from +13% to +215%, win rates of 53%–95%, profit factors up to 12.5, and drawdowns managed via take-profit/stop-loss. Examples include semiconductor-focused bots at +102% returns (70% win rate) and multi-sector agents hitting +132% (62% win rate), trading 1–25 tickers on 5min–60min frames. One bot targets WMT with +25% return and 73% win rate. Explore these for data-driven insights tailored to today's environment.
Head-to-Head Comparison
MDLZ, MNST, and WMT operate in consumer defensive spaces but diverge in models: MDLZ's snack focus exposes it to commodity costs, MNST's energy drinks drive growth via innovation but face tariffs, and WMT's scale yields pricing power in retail. Growth: MNST boasts 17% sales surge versus WMT's steady e-com and MDLZ's organic hurdles. Momentum favors WMT (12% YTD) over others' mixed paths. Risks include input inflation for all, but WMT mitigates via volume. Valuations: MNST at 49x P/E signals premium, WMT 45x reflects stability, MDLZ pressured by sentiment. Sentiment tilts to WMT's resilience.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors WMT based on superior trend consistency, YTD outperformance, e-commerce catalysts, and defensive positioning amid volatility. A dedicated WMT bot posts +25% annualized return with 73% win rate, aligning with broader relative strength versus MDLZ and MNST's post-earnings dips. While MNST shows sales momentum, WMT exhibits higher probability of sustained positioning in staples.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MDLZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and WMT’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WMT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MDLZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and WMT’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MDLZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WMT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -2.97% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +1.32% , and WMT (@Discount Stores) price fluctuated +0.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -2.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.01%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2073.90%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was +2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
WMT is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-2.68% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.77% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Discount Stores (+2.34% weekly)Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.
| MDLZ | MNST | WMT | |
| Capitalization | 73.5B | 75B | 1.02T |
| EBITDA | 4.97B | 2.53B | 46.5B |
| Gain YTD | 7.274 | 0.065 | 14.677 |
| P/E Ratio | 30.29 | 39.55 | 46.70 |
| Revenue | 38.5B | 8.29B | 713B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.77B | 10.7B |
| Total Debt | 21.8B | 199M | 67.1B |
MDLZ | MNST | WMT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 70 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 92 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 24 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 35 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 50 | 24 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 62 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDLZ's Valuation (26) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNST (92) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for WMT (92) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew significantly faster than MNST’s and significantly faster than WMT’s over the last 12 months.
WMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MNST (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MDLZ (81) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that WMT's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and significantly faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's SMR Rating (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as WMT (40) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (72) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to WMT’s and somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
WMT's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MNST (50) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (59) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that WMT's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as WMT (42) in the Specialty Stores industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (62) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to WMT’s and somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
| MDLZ | MNST | WMT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 29% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 50% | 5 days ago 47% | 7 days ago 34% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 25% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BUL | 58.06 | 1.28 | +2.25% |
| Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF | |||
| SDVY | 42.23 | 0.89 | +2.15% |
| First Trust SMID Cp Rising Div Achv ETF | |||
| QCLN | 53.73 | 0.50 | +0.94% |
| First Trust NASDAQ® Cln Edge® GrnEngyETF | |||
| MSFY | 19.26 | 0.11 | +0.55% |
| Kurv Yield Premium Str Microsoft ETF | |||
| MYCK | 25.06 | 0.09 | +0.36% |
| State Street® My2031 Corporate Bond ETF | |||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +1.80% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.88% | ||
More | ||||
WMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMT has been loosely correlated with COST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WMT jumps, then COST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | 100% | +2.15% | ||
| COST - WMT | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| BJ - WMT | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| PSMT - WMT | 36% Loosely correlated | +3.26% | ||
| TGT - WMT | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.17% | ||
| TBBB - WMT | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.19% | ||
More | ||||