MDLZ
Price
$59.09
Change
+$0.26 (+0.44%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
75.84B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MO
Price
$67.46
Change
+$0.66 (+0.99%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
112.75B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PEP
Price
$157.49
Change
+$2.69 (+1.74%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
215.28B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MDLZ or MO or PEP

Header iconMDLZ vs MO vs PEP Comparison
Open Charts MDLZ vs MO vs PEPBanner chart's image
MDLZ vs MO vs PEP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Mondelez International (MDLZ) vs. Altria Group (MO) vs. PepsiCo (PEP) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MO leads year-to-date with approximately 18% gains, driven by strong dividend yield around 6-7% and resilience in tobacco cash flows, outperforming peers amid market volatility.
  • PEP shows solid YTD performance near 12%, supported by diversified beverages and snacks, with a 3.5% dividend yield and recent earnings beats fostering stability.
  • MDLZ lags with about 2% YTD return, facing pressure from recent price declines and high cocoa costs, though analysts view it as undervalued by 18%.
  • All three offer defensive consumer staples exposure, but MO provides the highest yield, while PEP excels in growth consistency.
  • Recent momentum favors MO and PEP over MDLZ, with P/E ratios around 12x for MO, 27x for PEP, and 29x for MDLZ.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines MDLZ, MO, and PEP, three consumer staples giants offering stability in volatile markets. MDLZ focuses on snacks like Oreo and Cadbury, MO dominates U.S. tobacco with Marlboro, and PEP leads in beverages and Frito-Lay snacks. Investors seeking dividend income, relative performance insights, and sector resilience—such as income-focused traders or defensive portfolio builders—will find value in analyzing their recent momentum, valuations, and market positioning for informed stock comparison decisions.

MDLZ Overview and Recent Performance

MDLZ, or Mondelez International, is a leading global snacker with brands like Oreo, Cadbury, and Milka, generating about $36 billion in annual revenue across biscuits, chocolate, and baked snacks in over 150 countries. In recent market activity, the stock has experienced declines, with a roughly 9% drop over the past month and 15% over the year, trading around $55 amid high cocoa prices and softer consumer demand. YTD returns hover near 2%, underperforming broader indices. Sentiment reflects mixed analyst views, with the stock seen as 17.9% undervalued despite a P/E of about 29x and 3.6% dividend yield, influenced by premium chocolate investments and cost pressures.

MO Overview and Recent Performance

MO, Altria Group, manufactures smokeable and oral nicotine products primarily in the U.S., with iconic Marlboro cigarettes, on! pouches, and NJOY vapes driving revenue through subsidiaries like Philip Morris USA. Recent performance has been robust, with YTD gains around 18% and 1-month up 2%, trading near $68 as shares benefit from dividend sustainability and smoke-free growth. Amid declining cigarette volumes, strong cash flows and analyst upgrades, like Barclays raising targets, support sentiment. The stock trades at a forward P/E near 12x with a high 6-7% yield, positioning it as a defensive high-yielder in recent weeks.

PEP Overview and Recent Performance

PEP, PepsiCo, is a global leader in beverages and snacks, with Pepsi, Gatorade, Lay's, and Quaker brands across segments like Frito-Lay and international operations, employing over 300,000. Recent activity shows resilience, with YTD returns around 12% and a monthly uptick, trading near $159 after Q4 earnings beats and protein brand launches like Good Warrior. Despite snack volume challenges, pricing and acquisitions bolster growth, with a P/E around 27x, 3.5% yield, and low beta of 0.38 enhancing stability. Activist settlements and strategic shifts have positively influenced sentiment in recent market conditions.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from its library of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. Only the most suitable for current market conditions—based on volatility, trends, and backtested results—earn a spot among the 25 trending bots. These showcase impressive stats like annualized returns from 17% to over 200%, win rates of 53% to 95%, profit factors up to 25.8, and trade durations from 1 day to 62 days, covering styles such as trend following, hedging, and sector-specific plays in semiconductors, energy, and biotech via stocks, ETFs, and leveraged assets. Explore these high-performing options to potentially enhance your trading edge.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MDLZ, MO, and PEP share consumer staples defensiveness but diverge in models: MDLZ's chocolate/biscuits face commodity risks like cocoa, contrasting MO's U.S.-centric tobacco stability and PEP's global beverages/snacks diversification. Growth drivers include PEP's 2-4% organic sales outlook versus MDLZ's pricing amid costs and MO's smoke-free pivot. Recent momentum favors MO (18% YTD) over PEP (12%) and MDLZ (2%). Risks: regulatory for MO, inputs for MDLZ/ PEP. MO's lowest P/E (~12x) and highest yield contrast PEP's balance and MDLZ's premium valuation, with sentiment tilting to yield in uncertain times.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors MO due to superior trend consistency, highest dividend yield supporting total returns, and relative stability in recent market activity. While PEP offers balanced growth and MDLZ undervaluation potential, MO's cash flow resilience and momentum position it probabilistically stronger for near-term outperformance among these defensives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2026
Stock price -- (MDLZ: $59.09MO: $67.46PEP: $157.49)
Brand notoriety: MDLZ, MO and PEP are all notable
MDLZ represents the Food: Specialty/Candy industry, MO is part of the Tobacco industry, and PEP is in the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MDLZ: 70%, MO: 79%, PEP: 62%
Market capitalization -- MDLZ: $75.84B, MO: $112.75B, PEP: $215.28B
MDLZ [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $75.84B. MO’s [@Tobacco] market capitalization is $112.75B. PEP [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] has a market capitalization of $215.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $75.84B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tobacco] industry ranges from $251.31B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $336.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $15.05B. The average market capitalization across the [@Tobacco] industry is $33.6B. The average market capitalization across the [@Tobacco] industry is $23.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MDLZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMO’s FA Score has 5 green FA rating(s), and PEP’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MO’s FA Score: 5 green, 0 red.
  • PEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MO is a better buy in the long-term than PEP, which in turn is a better option than MDLZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MDLZ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and PEP’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MO is a better buy in the short-term than MDLZ, which in turn is a better option than PEP.

Price Growth

MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +2.69% price change this week, while MO (@Tobacco) price change was +2.59% , and PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price fluctuated +0.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.38%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.40%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164976.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

MO is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

PEP is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.89% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

@Tobacco (+1.70% weekly)

The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+2.02% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEP($215B) has a higher market cap than MO($113B) and MDLZ($75.8B). MDLZ has higher P/E ratio than PEP and MO: MDLZ (31.26) vs PEP (26.25) and MO (16.37). MO YTD gains are higher at: 18.957 vs. MDLZ (10.722) and PEP (10.714). PEP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.5B vs. MO (10.8B) and MDLZ (4.97B). MDLZ has less debt than MO and PEP: MDLZ (21.8B) vs MO (25.7B) and PEP (49.9B). PEP has higher revenues than MDLZ and MO: PEP (93.9B) vs MDLZ (38.5B) and MO (20.1B).
MDLZMOPEP
Capitalization75.8B113B215B
EBITDA4.97B10.8B15.5B
Gain YTD10.72218.95710.714
P/E Ratio31.2616.3726.25
Revenue38.5B20.1B93.9B
Total CashN/AN/A9.53B
Total Debt21.8B25.7B49.9B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MDLZ vs MO vs PEP: Fundamental Ratings
MDLZ
MO
PEP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
196357
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71955
SMR RATING
1..100
71922
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
532952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
181335
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
855050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MO's Valuation (10) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as PEP (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as MDLZ (28) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MO's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Tobacco industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEP (55) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that MO's stock grew somewhat faster than PEP’s and somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MO's SMR Rating (9) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as PEP (22) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MO's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as PEP (52) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as MDLZ (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MO's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as MDLZ (18) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as PEP (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MO's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MDLZMOPEP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MDLZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PEP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASGI24.180.30
+1.26%
abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund
VOOG433.003.39
+0.79%
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
MBCC35.690.27
+0.76%
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF
JULH24.840.02
+0.10%
Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Jul
NVOH20.67-0.15
-0.71%
NOVO NORDISK A/S (B SHARES) ADRHEDGED

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
+0.44%
GIS - MDLZ
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
CAG - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
CPB - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
KHC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
MKC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
More