This stock comparison examines MDLZ, PG, and UL, three leaders in consumer staples with exposure to snacks, household essentials, and personal care. These defensive names attract investors seeking stability amid market volatility, as well as traders eyeing relative performance in the sector. With low betas and consistent dividends, they offer insights into growth drivers like premiumization versus essential demand, aiding decisions on portfolio allocation and sector rotation in the current environment.
Mondelez International (MDLZ) is a global snacking powerhouse, producing chocolate, biscuits, and baked goods under brands like Oreo, Cadbury, and Milka. Generating $38.5B in trailing revenue, it holds top positions in biscuits and chocolate markets across 150+ countries. In recent market activity, MDLZ shares have shown resilience, up 7.64% YTD amid broader pressures, with a market cap of $75B and P/E of 30.66. Easing cocoa costs have boosted sentiment, prompting Morgan Stanley to raise its price target to $70 and name it a top pick. Premium chocolate expansions and sustainable packaging initiatives have influenced positive analyst views, though share fluctuations reflect commodity sensitivities.
Procter & Gamble (PG) dominates household and personal care with iconic brands like Tide, Pampers, and Gillette, serving daily needs worldwide. Its $85B revenue underscores scale, with a $354B market cap and P/E of 22.41. Recent weeks have seen steady performance at 6.45% YTD gain, though trailing the S&P slightly over longer periods. Innovations in premium baby care and home products, alongside loyalty tests, have shaped sentiment. Defensive beta of 0.34 and robust cash flows support stability, but volume pressures in North America temper momentum in a competitive staples landscape.
Unilever (UL) offers a broad consumer goods portfolio spanning beauty, personal care, home care, and nutrition via Dove, Hellmann's, and Ben & Jerry's, reaching 190 countries with €50.5B turnover. Market cap stands at $143B, P/E at 22.10. Recent activity reflects caution, with 0.79% YTD and 2.29% 1-year returns amid share weakness. Global diversification aids resilience, but short-term declines highlight valuation reevaluations. Low beta of 0.26 positions it defensively, influenced by emerging market exposure and category volume shifts.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, tailored for copy trading across stocks, ETFs, and crypto in today's dynamic markets. These bots employ diverse strategies like price action analysis, deep learning, and risk controls, spanning timeframes from 5min to 60min and volatility levels low to high. Standouts have delivered annualized returns up to 279% with win rates exceeding 90% in recent periods, such as on leveraged ETFs and tech stocks. Selected for current conditions, they highlight superior risk-adjusted performance. Explore these bots to enhance your trading edge.
MDLZ, PG, and UL operate in consumer staples but diverge in focus: MDLZ emphasizes snacks with growth from premiumization, while PG and UL prioritize essentials like cleaning and beauty. PG's superior scale ($354B cap) offers stability, contrasting UL's emerging markets tilt (59% revenue). Recent momentum favors MDLZ on cocoa relief, versus peers' volume hurdles. Risks include commodities for MDLZ, competition for PG, and FX for UL. Valuations reflect snack premiums (MDLZ P/E 30.66) over staples (~22), with sentiment buoyed by MDLZ catalysts.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors MDLZ due to stronger trend consistency, YTD outperformance, and positive catalysts like easing cocoa pressures and analyst upgrades. Its relative positioning in premium snacks suggests higher probabilistic upside versus PG's scale-driven stability and UL's modest momentum, based on observable factors in recent market activity.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MDLZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and UL’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MDLZ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and UL’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +2.54% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +1.43% , and UL (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +5.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.29%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.38%.
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
PG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
@Household/Personal Care (+2.76% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| MDLZ | PG | UL | |
| Capitalization | 75.7B | 337B | 126B |
| EBITDA | 4.97B | 24.5B | 11.3B |
| Gain YTD | 10.553 | 2.010 | -10.115 |
| P/E Ratio | 31.22 | 21.51 | 19.32 |
| Revenue | 38.5B | 85.3B | 59.8B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 10.8B | N/A |
| Total Debt | 21.8B | 36.6B | N/A |
MDLZ | PG | UL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 51 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 39 Fair valued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 53 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | 29 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 59 | 77 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 80 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDLZ's Valuation (27) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as PG (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UL (40) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MDLZ (72) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as UL (79) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
PG's SMR Rating (29) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for UL (96) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s and significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as PG (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UL (77) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew somewhat faster than PG’s and somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.
| MDLZ | PG | UL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 28% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 44% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 42% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 49% | 5 days ago 42% | 10 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 36% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 36% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WDI | 13.56 | 0.01 | +0.07% |
| Western Asset Diversified Income Fund | |||
| ADPV | 42.23 | N/A | N/A |
| Adaptiv™ Select ETF | |||
| JANH | 24.39 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Jan | |||
| FEAC | 29.07 | -0.04 | -0.13% |
| Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | |||
| IUSV | 104.42 | -0.78 | -0.74% |
| iShares Core S&P US Value ETF | |||