MDLZ
Price
$59.00
Change
-$0.09 (-0.15%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
75.72B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PG
Price
$145.16
Change
-$1.50 (-1.02%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
337.35B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UL
Price
$58.34
Change
-$0.12 (-0.21%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
126.01B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MDLZ or PG or UL

Header iconMDLZ vs PG vs UL Comparison
Open Charts MDLZ vs PG vs ULBanner chart's image
MDLZ vs PG vs UL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Mondelez International (MDLZ) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Unilever (UL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MDLZ leads YTD performance at 7.64%, outperforming PG (6.45%) and UL (0.79%), driven by easing cocoa pressures and analyst upgrades.
  • PG boasts the largest market cap at $354B with stable defensive qualities, though recent momentum lags amid broader consumer staples trends.
  • UL shows modest 1-year returns of 2.29%, reflecting share price weakness but supported by its diversified global portfolio.
  • All three exhibit low betas (0.26-0.37), signaling reduced volatility relative to the S&P 500 in current market conditions.
  • Valuation contrasts: MDLZ P/E at 30.66, PG and UL around 22, highlighting growth expectations for snacks versus staples.
  • Recent analyst sentiment favors MDLZ with targets up to $70, amid premium chocolate focus.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines MDLZ, PG, and UL, three leaders in consumer staples with exposure to snacks, household essentials, and personal care. These defensive names attract investors seeking stability amid market volatility, as well as traders eyeing relative performance in the sector. With low betas and consistent dividends, they offer insights into growth drivers like premiumization versus essential demand, aiding decisions on portfolio allocation and sector rotation in the current environment.

MDLZ Overview and Recent Performance

Mondelez International (MDLZ) is a global snacking powerhouse, producing chocolate, biscuits, and baked goods under brands like Oreo, Cadbury, and Milka. Generating $38.5B in trailing revenue, it holds top positions in biscuits and chocolate markets across 150+ countries. In recent market activity, MDLZ shares have shown resilience, up 7.64% YTD amid broader pressures, with a market cap of $75B and P/E of 30.66. Easing cocoa costs have boosted sentiment, prompting Morgan Stanley to raise its price target to $70 and name it a top pick. Premium chocolate expansions and sustainable packaging initiatives have influenced positive analyst views, though share fluctuations reflect commodity sensitivities.

PG Overview and Recent Performance

Procter & Gamble (PG) dominates household and personal care with iconic brands like Tide, Pampers, and Gillette, serving daily needs worldwide. Its $85B revenue underscores scale, with a $354B market cap and P/E of 22.41. Recent weeks have seen steady performance at 6.45% YTD gain, though trailing the S&P slightly over longer periods. Innovations in premium baby care and home products, alongside loyalty tests, have shaped sentiment. Defensive beta of 0.34 and robust cash flows support stability, but volume pressures in North America temper momentum in a competitive staples landscape.

UL Overview and Recent Performance

Unilever (UL) offers a broad consumer goods portfolio spanning beauty, personal care, home care, and nutrition via Dove, Hellmann's, and Ben & Jerry's, reaching 190 countries with €50.5B turnover. Market cap stands at $143B, P/E at 22.10. Recent activity reflects caution, with 0.79% YTD and 2.29% 1-year returns amid share weakness. Global diversification aids resilience, but short-term declines highlight valuation reevaluations. Low beta of 0.26 positions it defensively, influenced by emerging market exposure and category volume shifts.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, tailored for copy trading across stocks, ETFs, and crypto in today's dynamic markets. These bots employ diverse strategies like price action analysis, deep learning, and risk controls, spanning timeframes from 5min to 60min and volatility levels low to high. Standouts have delivered annualized returns up to 279% with win rates exceeding 90% in recent periods, such as on leveraged ETFs and tech stocks. Selected for current conditions, they highlight superior risk-adjusted performance. Explore these bots to enhance your trading edge.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MDLZ, PG, and UL operate in consumer staples but diverge in focus: MDLZ emphasizes snacks with growth from premiumization, while PG and UL prioritize essentials like cleaning and beauty. PG's superior scale ($354B cap) offers stability, contrasting UL's emerging markets tilt (59% revenue). Recent momentum favors MDLZ on cocoa relief, versus peers' volume hurdles. Risks include commodities for MDLZ, competition for PG, and FX for UL. Valuations reflect snack premiums (MDLZ P/E 30.66) over staples (~22), with sentiment buoyed by MDLZ catalysts.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors MDLZ due to stronger trend consistency, YTD outperformance, and positive catalysts like easing cocoa pressures and analyst upgrades. Its relative positioning in premium snacks suggests higher probabilistic upside versus PG's scale-driven stability and UL's modest momentum, based on observable factors in recent market activity.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2026
Stock price -- (MDLZ: $59.00PG: $145.16UL: $58.34)
Brand notoriety: MDLZ and PG are notable and UL is not notable
PG and UL are part of the Household/Personal Care industry, and MDLZ is in the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MDLZ: 65%, PG: 111%, UL: 84%
Market capitalization -- MDLZ: $75.72B, PG: $337.35B, UL: $126.01B
$PG [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $337.35B. $UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $ $126.01B. $MDLZ [@Food: Specialty/Candy] has a market capitalization of $ $75.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $ $337.35B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $ $75.72B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $ $19.87B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $ $14.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MDLZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and UL’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the long-term than MDLZ, which in turn is a better option than UL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MDLZ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and UL’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the short-term than PG and UL.

Price Growth

MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +2.54% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +1.43% , and UL (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +5.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.29%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

PG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.04% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

@Household/Personal Care (+2.76% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PG($337B) has a higher market cap than UL($126B) and MDLZ($75.7B). MDLZ has higher P/E ratio than PG and UL: MDLZ (31.22) vs PG (21.51) and UL (19.32). MDLZ YTD gains are higher at: 10.553 vs. PG (2.010) and UL (-10.115). PG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.5B vs. UL (11.3B) and MDLZ (4.97B). MDLZ has less debt than PG and UL: MDLZ (21.8B) vs PG (36.6B) and UL (). PG has higher revenues than UL and MDLZ: PG (85.3B) vs UL (59.8B) and MDLZ (38.5B).
MDLZPGUL
Capitalization75.7B337B126B
EBITDA4.97B24.5B11.3B
Gain YTD10.5532.010-10.115
P/E Ratio31.2221.5119.32
Revenue38.5B85.3B59.8B
Total CashN/A10.8BN/A
Total Debt21.8B36.6BN/A
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MDLZ vs PG vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
MDLZ
PG
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
195151
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
725379
SMR RATING
1..100
712996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
535977
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
208080
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
855085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDLZ's Valuation (27) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as PG (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UL (40) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MDLZ (72) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is in the same range as UL (79) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

PG's SMR Rating (29) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (71) in the Food Major Diversified industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for UL (96) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s and significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as PG (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UL (77) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (80) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MDLZ's stock grew somewhat faster than PG’s and somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MDLZPGUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MDLZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WDI13.560.01
+0.07%
Western Asset Diversified Income Fund
ADPV42.23N/A
N/A
Adaptiv™ Select ETF
JANH24.39N/A
N/A
Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Jan
FEAC29.07-0.04
-0.13%
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
IUSV104.42-0.78
-0.74%
iShares Core S&P US Value ETF