This stock comparison examines MNST, PEP, and PG, key players in the consumer staples sector spanning energy drinks, beverages, and household essentials. Investors seeking defensive positions with growth potential or traders analyzing relative performance in volatile markets will benefit from insights into their business models, recent momentum, and sector dynamics. Amid economic uncertainty, these stocks highlight trade-offs between high-growth exposure and established stability, aiding decisions on market positioning and portfolio allocation.
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) focuses on energy drinks, with Monster Energy as its flagship brand, distributed globally via an asset-light model outsourcing production. The company reported record Q4 revenue of $2.13 billion, up 17.6% year-over-year, fueled by 18.9% growth in Monster Energy and strong EMEA demand at 32.6%. Shares peaked near $86 post-earnings but pulled back amid rising aluminum costs and competition, declining about 11% over recent weeks to around $73-74. Sentiment remains supported by innovation in sugar-free variants and international expansion, though valuation at a premium P/E reflects growth expectations tempered by broader market pressures.
PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) operates a diversified portfolio including beverages like Pepsi and snacks via Frito-Lay, emphasizing global scale and pricing strategies. Recent analyst upgrades highlight 2026 growth prospects and pricing power, with YTD returns near 5.86%. However, shares have faced headwinds, dropping roughly 9% in recent weeks to about $150, mirroring consumer staples softness amid volume concerns in North America. Performance reflects resilient demand but execution risks and competition, with Q4 results showing modest beats yet cautious forward guidance on costs.
Procter & Gamble (PG) is a consumer goods leader with brands in beauty, health, and fabric care sold worldwide. It demonstrates resilience via strong dividends and premiumization, though recent commodity cost rises pressured margins. Shares declined around 13% over recent weeks to near $143, underperforming amid softer volumes but outperforming the sector in YTD stability at 0.60%. Key influences include supply chain adjustments and innovation focus, with Q2 fiscal results beating estimates yet highlighting ongoing challenges in a cautious spending environment.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, hedging volatility, and sector-specific plays (e.g., semiconductors, energy, consumer staples), with timeframes from 5-minute to daily charts. Standouts show annualized returns up to +137.81%, win rates of 55-89%, and profit factors of 1.42-3.57, such as a 15-minute GGLL bot at +137% or semiconductor strategies at +92%. Selected for current market fit, they adapt via machine learning for outperformance. Explore these for potential edges in today’s conditions.
MNST’s growth-oriented energy drink model contrasts PEP’s balanced beverages-snacks diversification and PG’s broad household essentials stability. Growth drivers favor MNST’s 17%+ sales surge and international momentum over PEP’s pricing gains and PG’s premium shifts. Recent momentum shows MNST with higher volatility post-peak, while PEP and PG exhibit steadier declines. Risks include MNST’s competition and costs, PEP’s volume softness, and PG’s input inflation. All share staples defensiveness, but MNST trades at premium valuations (~49x P/E) versus ~28x for PEP, with sentiment tilting to MNST’s catalysts amid relative positioning.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors MNST due to superior trend consistency in energy drinks, recent revenue catalysts, and stronger relative positioning versus PEP and PG’s margin hurdles. Probabilistic edges stem from MNST’s international growth and innovation, though with higher volatility; stability seekers may lean toward PG.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MNST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePEP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and PG’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MNST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and PG’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +2.74% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +0.71% , and PG (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +0.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +83822.82%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.47%.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
PG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.
Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Household/Personal Care (+0.00% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| MNST | PEP | PG | |
| Capitalization | 75.5B | 215B | 336B |
| EBITDA | 2.53B | 15.5B | 24.5B |
| Gain YTD | 0.730 | 10.362 | 1.539 |
| P/E Ratio | 39.81 | 24.65 | 21.41 |
| Revenue | 8.29B | 93.9B | 85.3B |
| Total Cash | 2.77B | 9.53B | 10.8B |
| Total Debt | 199M | 49.9B | 36.6B |
MNST | PEP | PG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 54 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 26 Undervalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 61 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 21 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 32 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 43 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PG (38) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MNST (93) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to PG’s and significantly faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PEP (61) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MNST's stock grew somewhat faster than PG’s and somewhat faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (21) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PG (30) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as MNST (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (50) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as PG (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (63) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (82) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and somewhat faster than PG’s over the last 12 months.
| MNST | PEP | PG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 43% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 13 days ago 39% | 13 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 47% | 1 day ago 44% | 6 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 33% | 1 day ago 35% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| STK | 45.75 | 0.08 | +0.18% |
| Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund | |||
| SROI | 34.41 | N/A | N/A |
| Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sus Eqs ETF | |||
| BIV | 77.64 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
| Vanguard Interm-Term Bond ETF | |||
| BHFAL | 17.09 | -0.07 | -0.41% |
| Brighthouse Financial | |||
| AMDY | 38.04 | -0.34 | -0.89% |
| YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 36% Loosely correlated | -4.17% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
More | ||||