MNST
Price
$75.75
Change
-$1.48 (-1.92%)
Updated
Apr 21, 11:14 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
75.52B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PEP
Price
$154.58
Change
-$2.41 (-1.54%)
Updated
Apr 21, 01:13 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
214.57B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SYY
Price
$75.48
Change
-$0.78 (-1.02%)
Updated
Apr 21, 11:52 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
36.47B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNST or PEP or SYY

Header iconMNST vs PEP vs SYY Comparison
Open Charts MNST vs PEP vs SYYBanner chart's image
MNST vs PEP vs SYY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. PepsiCo (PEP) vs. Sysco (SYY) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MNST trades at a premium P/E of ~40x with flat YTD performance (+0.4%), reflecting growth expectations amid recent pullbacks despite strong Q4 sales growth.
  • PEP shows YTD gains of +11.7% and a P/E of ~26x, bolstered by strategic acquisitions like Poppi, though recent weekly declines signal short-term caution.
  • SYY leads YTD performance at +16.1% with the lowest P/E (~23x), supported by volume gains and AI initiatives in recent quarters.
  • All three exhibit low betas (<0.6), offering defensive sector exposure, but SYY demonstrates superior relative momentum in recent market activity.
  • Market caps vary significantly: PEP at $217B dwarfs MNST ($75B) and SYY ($41B), influencing liquidity and stability profiles.
  • Analyst targets suggest upside: MNST ~13%, PEP ~8%, SYY ~7%.

Introduction

This stock comparison evaluates MNST, PEP, and SYY—key players in beverages and food distribution—amid shifting consumer staples dynamics. These stocks appeal to investors seeking defensive positioning with growth potential, as energy drinks, diversified beverages, and foodservice supply chains navigate volume trends, acquisitions, and operational efficiencies. Traders focused on relative performance, valuation sensitivity, and sector momentum will find insights into recent price behaviors, sentiment drivers, and head-to-head contrasts in the current market environment.

MNST Overview and Recent Performance

Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) specializes in energy drinks and related beverages, operating through segments like Monster Energy Drinks and Strategic Brands. In recent market activity, the stock has experienced a pullback, trading around $77 with a market cap of $75B and P/E of 39.7x. YTD performance stands at +0.4%, underperforming broader indices amid mixed returns, though 1-year gains exceed 39%. Strong Q4 results showed net sales up 17.6% to $2.13B, beating expectations, fueled by international growth and household penetration. Sentiment reflects a buying opportunity post-dip, with analysts maintaining Moderate Buy ratings and targets around $87, influenced by resilient demand despite competition and input costs.

PEP Overview and Recent Performance

PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) is a global leader in beverages and snacks, segmented across North America foods/beverages and international operations. Shares trade near $159, with a $217B market cap and P/E of 26.5x. YTD return of +11.7% outpaces peers, though recent weeks saw a 2.5% dip. Key drivers include the $1.95B Poppi acquisition to bolster health-focused beverages, enhancing portfolio diversification. Analysts view it as undervalued by ~40%, with targets averaging $171, supported by stable demand and strategic expansions despite volume softness in some areas.

SYY Overview and Recent Performance

Sysco Corporation (SYY) distributes food products to restaurants, healthcare, and education sectors via U.S. and international foodservice operations. Trading at ~$85 with a $41B market cap and P/E of 22.9x, it leads YTD at +16.1%. Recent quarters featured sales up 3% and U.S. volumes rising 0.8-1.2%, with raised FY26 EPS guidance on volume gains and AI efficiencies. Developments include a CFO transition and distribution deals like Reborn Coffee, alongside dividend declarations. Low beta (0.6) underscores stability, with targets at $91 signaling modest upside amid foodservice recovery.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features over 25 curated AI trading bots from hundreds available, selected for top performance in current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots deliver impressive stats, including annualized returns up to +216%, win rates to 95%, and profit factors exceeding 25x, with examples like a volatility bot at +216% (76% win rate) on tickers such as USAR/SMR and a semiconductor bot at +103% (71% win rate) on SOXL. Strategies span trend following, dip buying, hedging, and sector focus (energy, semis, aerospace), using 5-60min timeframes and AI/ML for signals. Virtual Agents include risk controls like corridor TP/SL. Explore these for diverse styles and real-time adaptability—visit Trending AI Robots to subscribe and copy top performers.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MNST emphasizes high-growth energy drinks with international expansion, contrasting PEP’s diversified snacks/beverages model and SYY’s distribution focus. Growth drivers differ: MNST leverages category penetration, PEP acquisitions, SYY volumes/AI. Recent momentum favors SYY (YTD +16%), over PEP (+12%) and flat MNST. Risks include competition/input costs for MNST, volume softness for PEP, and macro/foodservice cycles for SYY. All share consumer staples exposure with low betas, but SYY’s attractive valuation offers stability trade-offs versus MNST’s premium for growth and PEP’s scale.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SYY based on superior YTD momentum, lowest valuation (P/E ~23x), and consistent volume catalysts with operational enhancements. Its relative stability and outperformance position it probabilistically stronger in defensive rotations, though PEP trails closely on scale and MNST offers upside if growth reaccelerates.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (MNST: $77.23PEP: $156.99SYY: $76.26)
Brand notoriety: MNST and SYY are not notable and PEP is notable
MNST and PEP are part of the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry, and SYY is in the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNST: 134%, PEP: 94%, SYY: 71%
Market capitalization -- MNST: $75.52B, PEP: $214.57B, SYY: $36.47B
$MNST [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $75.52B. $PEP’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $ $214.57B. $SYY [@Food Distributors] has a market capitalization of $ $36.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $ $324.88B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $ $36.47B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $ $23.45B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $ $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePEP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and SYY’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PEP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SYY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PEP is a better buy in the long-term than MNST, which in turn is a better option than SYY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and SYY’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SYY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNST is a better buy in the short-term than PEP, which in turn is a better option than SYY.

Price Growth

MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +2.74% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +0.71% , and SYY (@Food Distributors) price fluctuated +3.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +83822.82%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

MNST is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

PEP is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.

SYY is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.29% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

@Food Distributors (-0.96% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEP($215B) has a higher market cap than MNST($75.5B) and SYY($36.5B). MNST has higher P/E ratio than PEP and SYY: MNST (39.81) vs PEP (24.65) and SYY (20.56). PEP YTD gains are higher at: 10.362 vs. SYY (5.037) and MNST (0.730). PEP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.5B vs. SYY (4.1B) and MNST (2.53B). PEP has more cash in the bank: 9.53B vs. MNST (2.77B) and SYY (169M). MNST has less debt than SYY and PEP: MNST (199M) vs SYY (15B) and PEP (49.9B). PEP has higher revenues than SYY and MNST: PEP (93.9B) vs SYY (82.6B) and MNST (8.29B).
MNSTPEPSYY
Capitalization75.5B215B36.5B
EBITDA2.53B15.5B4.1B
Gain YTD0.73010.3625.037
P/E Ratio39.8124.6520.56
Revenue8.29B93.9B82.6B
Total Cash2.77B9.53B169M
Total Debt199M49.9B15B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNST vs PEP vs SYY: Fundamental Ratings
MNST
PEP
SYY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
695415
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
246175
SMR RATING
1..100
352114
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
503260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
634351
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
755065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PEP's Valuation (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SYY (50) in the Food Distributors industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MNST (93) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to SYY’s and significantly faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEP (61) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SYY (75) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that MNST's stock grew somewhat faster than PEP’s and somewhat faster than SYY’s over the last 12 months.

SYY's SMR Rating (14) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as PEP (21) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as MNST (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that SYY's stock grew similarly to PEP’s and similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.

PEP's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (50) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as SYY (60) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and similarly to SYY’s over the last 12 months.

PEP's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SYY (51) in the Food Distributors industry, and is in the same range as MNST (63) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to SYY’s and similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNSTPEPSYY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PEP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SYY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZSB23.25N/A
N/A
USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Stgy Fd
CGCB26.49-0.01
-0.02%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF
SEPP31.50-0.05
-0.16%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Sep
EZBC44.14-0.68
-1.52%
Franklin Bitcoin ETF
DGP191.67-4.82
-2.45%
DB Gold Double Long ETN

MNST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNST
1D Price
Change %
MNST100%
+0.66%
CCEP - MNST
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
KO - MNST
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
PEP - MNST
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
CELH - MNST
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.17%
KDP - MNST
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
More