Advertisement
MNST or PG or PM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs. Procter & Gamble Company (PG) vs. Philip Morris International (PM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- MNST delivered strong Q4 net sales growth of 17.6% year-over-year, supported by international expansion, though recent share price pullbacks reflect competitive pressures and cost headwinds.
- PG exhibits defensive stability with YTD gains around 5-6%, but faces recent weakness from soft demand, inflation, and tariff risks in consumer staples.
- PM leads YTD performance at nearly 9%, driven by smoke-free products like ZYN, offering resilience amid sector volatility.
- Over one year, MNST outperforms at ~42%, followed by PM at ~20%, while PG lags; valuations show MNST at premium P/E of ~40x versus peers.
- All three trade in consumer defensive space, but PM shows strongest momentum, MNST growth potential, and PG dividend reliability.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines MNST, PG, and PM—leaders in energy beverages, household essentials, and tobacco alternatives, respectively. These consumer defensive names appeal to traders seeking growth amid volatility and investors prioritizing stability in uncertain markets. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in momentum, with shifts in sentiment driven by earnings beats, cost pressures, and sector rotations. Understanding their relative performance aids portfolio diversification and informed positioning in the current environment.
MNST Overview and Recent Performance
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) specializes in energy drinks, holding a significant share of the global market through brands like Monster Energy. In recent market activity, MNST reported robust fourth-quarter results, with net sales up 17.6% year-over-year to $2.13 billion and adjusted EPS beating expectations at $0.51. International sales growth outpaced the U.S., fueling optimism despite elevated costs for aluminum cans and promotions squeezing margins. Shares experienced pullbacks amid broader consumer staples weakness, down ~4% over the past month, yet one-year returns exceed 42%, reflecting long-term growth prospects. Analyst targets around $100 underscore resilience, though competition and input costs influence near-term sentiment.
PG Overview and Recent Performance
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is a global leader in consumer goods, offering brands across beauty, grooming, health care, fabric, and baby care segments like Tide, Pampers, and Gillette. Recent weeks saw PG shares soften amid soft category demand, intensified promotions, and rising commodity inflation, with a ~6% monthly decline. YTD performance holds positive at ~5-6%, outperforming the sector in stability, supported by strong free cash flow. Tariff pressures and macroeconomic challenges in key markets have weighed on sentiment, yet the company's diversified portfolio and resilient positioning maintain appeal for defensive investors. Trading around $150, it lags one-year peers but offers undervaluation potential per analysts.
PM Overview and Recent Performance
Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) focuses on cigarettes and smoke-free products like IQOS, ZYN nicotine pouches, and heated tobacco, operating in over 180 countries. In recent market activity, PM demonstrated strength with ~9% YTD gains, outpacing staples peers, fueled by explosive ZYN growth and smoke-free transition momentum. Shares dipped ~4% monthly but rose over 3% weekly, with one-year returns near 20% including dividends. Declining combustible volumes pose risks, offset by robust adjusted EPS growth and sector resilience. Trading near $175, PM's pivot to reduced-risk products bolsters positive sentiment amid volatility.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. Only the most suitable for prevailing conditions—like high volatility in tech, energy, and staples—earn a spot, with standout stats including annualized returns up to +209% (e.g., USAR/SMR/CIFR bot), win rates from 52-95%, and profit factors exceeding 2.0. Bots vary from short-term signal agents (15-60 minutes) to swing traders, some targeting consumer staples like a COST/NFLX/HD/PG strategy at +23% annualized and 72% win rate. These metrics highlight adaptive performance in rotating markets. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligning with your trading approach.
Head-to-Head Comparison
MNST, PG, and PM operate in consumer defensive realms but diverge in models: MNST's high-growth energy drinks emphasize international expansion (43% of sales), versus PG's broad staples stability and PM's tobacco-to-smoke-free shift. Growth drivers favor MNST (17%+ sales surges) and PM (ZYN catalysts), while PG prioritizes margins amid inflation. Recent momentum ranks PM highest YTD, MNST over one year; risks include MNST/ PG competition/costs and PM regulatory hurdles. Valuations show MNST at ~40x P/E (premium for growth), PM ~25x with dividends, PG balanced but sensitive to slowdowns. Sentiment tilts toward transition plays like PM, trading off MNST's upside for PG's safety.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors PM for its consistent trend strength, YTD leadership, smoke-free catalysts, and balanced risk-reward in defensive sectors. Relative to MNST's valuation stretch and PG's demand pressures, PM shows higher probability of sustained outperformance based on momentum and positioning.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MNST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PM’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MNST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and PM’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +5.28% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +2.47% , and PM (@Tobacco) price fluctuated +1.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164976.25%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.71%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.40%.
Reported Earning Dates
MNST is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
PG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.
PM is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+2.02% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Household/Personal Care (+2.02% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
@Tobacco (+1.70% weekly)The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.
| MNST | PG | PM | |
| Capitalization | 74.5B | 341B | 251B |
| EBITDA | 2.53B | 24.5B | 17.5B |
| Gain YTD | -0.626 | 3.064 | 1.427 |
| P/E Ratio | 39.27 | 21.73 | 22.20 |
| Revenue | 8.29B | 85.3B | 40.6B |
| Total Cash | 2.77B | 10.8B | N/A |
| Total Debt | 199M | 36.6B | 48.8B |
MNST | PG | PM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 52 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 39 Fair valued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 51 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 29 | 3 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 59 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 76 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PM's Valuation (23) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as PG (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MNST (92) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PM's stock grew similarly to PG’s and significantly faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
PM's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as MNST (23) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (51) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PM's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and somewhat faster than PG’s over the last 12 months.
PM's SMR Rating (3) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as PG (29) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as MNST (34) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PM's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PM (57) in the Tobacco industry, and is in the same range as PG (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to PM’s and similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PM (73) in the Tobacco industry, and is in the same range as PG (76) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to PM’s and similarly to PG’s over the last 12 months.
| MNST | PG | PM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 42% | 21 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 33% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 41% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FDLS | 38.99 | 0.27 | +0.70% |
| Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | |||
| HIBS | 40.26 | 0.26 | +0.65% |
| Direxion Daily S&P 500® Hi Bt Br 3X ETF | |||
| IWD | 223.17 | 1.22 | +0.55% |
| iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | |||
| ZNOV | 26.85 | 0.04 | +0.15% |
| Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrNov | |||
| GIGB | 46.01 | 0.03 | +0.07% |
| Goldman Sachs Acss Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF | |||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +1.40% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
More | ||||
PG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.
PM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PM has been loosely correlated with BTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PM jumps, then BTI could also see price increases.