Advertisement
MNST or PG or UL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Monster Beverage (MNST) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Unilever (UL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- MNST delivered strong Q4 results with 17.6% net sales growth but faced post-earnings pullback amid cost pressures, trading at a premium P/E of around 40x with no dividend.
- PG shows stability as a consumer staples leader, with recent stock underperformance versus the market but consistent analyst support and a reliable dividend yield near 2.7%.
- UL exhibits mixed short-term weakness with YTD gains lagging peers, yet benefits from diversified global exposure and a 3.4% dividend yield at a more attractive P/E of about 22x.
- Relative momentum favors MNST over the past year at 40%, while PG and UL prioritize defensive qualities in volatile conditions.
- Valuation sensitivity highlights trade-offs: growth potential in MNST versus income stability in PG and UL.
- Sector exposure contrasts MNST's energy drink focus with the broader household essentials of PG and UL.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines MNST, PG, and UL in the current market environment, highlighting contrasts in growth dynamics, defensive attributes, and relative performance. MNST represents high-growth beverages, while PG and UL anchor consumer staples with global household brands. Traders seeking momentum may eye MNST, whereas investors prioritizing stability and dividends could favor PG or UL. Amid recent volatility from costs, tariffs, and sentiment shifts, this analysis aids informed positioning in consumer sectors.
MNST Overview and Recent Performance
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST), headquartered in Corona, California, specializes in energy drinks like Monster Energy, Reign, and Bang, alongside craft beers and hard seltzers. In recent market activity, MNST reported robust Q4 results, including 17.6% net sales growth and 64.9% rise in net income per diluted share, fueled by international expansion and strong demand for sugar-free variants. However, shares pulled back post-earnings due to elevated costs like aluminum cans, promotional allowances, tariffs, and inflation concerns, leading to underperformance versus consumer staples peers over recent weeks. Leadership changes, including new regional CEOs, aim to sharpen execution amid competition from Red Bull and Coca-Cola. Trading around $77 with a market cap near $76B and P/E of 40x, sentiment reflects growth promise tempered by margin pressures.
PG Overview and Recent Performance
Procter & Gamble (PG), based in Cincinnati, Ohio, is a multinational leader in branded consumer goods across beauty, grooming, health care, fabric & home care, and baby/family care, with iconic brands like Tide, Pampers, and Gillette. Recent weeks have seen PG shares decline more than the broader market and Consumer Staples sector, amid analyst estimate revisions and valuation debates ahead of earnings. Challenges include commodity costs, tariffs, and macroeconomic headwinds, yet strong brand portfolios and product innovations sustain long-term appeal. Consensus anticipates $1.57 EPS growth, with the stock at around $153, market cap over $370B, P/E near 25x, and a 2.7% dividend yield reinforcing its defensive positioning.
UL Overview and Recent Performance
Unilever PLC (UL), headquartered in London, operates as a fast-moving consumer goods giant with Beauty & Wellbeing, Personal Care, Home Care, and Foods segments, featuring brands like Dove, Axe, Hellmann's, and Ben & Jerry's across 190 countries. In recent market activity, UL shares have shown short-term weakness, with a 5% weekly drop and YTD underperformance versus indices, amid competitive pressures and digital transformation efforts. Broader gains over three months reflect resilience in emerging markets (59% of sales), though valuation checks highlight modest intrinsic discounts. Trading near $65, with a $143B market cap, P/E around 22x, and 3.4% dividend yield, sentiment balances global diversification against near-term momentum cooling.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 curated AI trading bots from hundreds available, selected for superior performance in current market conditions like volatility and sector rotations. These bots trade thousands of tickers using diverse strategies—technical/fundamental analysis, swing trading, trend following, hedging—across timeframes from 5min to 60min. Stats highlight annualized returns up to +217%, win rates of 53-95%, and profit factors to 25.8, with low drawdowns (e.g., a consumer bot including PG at +23% return, 72% win rate). Ideal for copy trading, they adapt to energy booms, semis surges, and staples trends. Explore Trending AI Robots to align bots with your portfolio.
Head-to-Head Comparison
MNST’s niche energy drink model drives higher growth (40% 1-year return) but exposes it to pricing competition and no dividend, contrasting PG and UL’s diversified staples portfolios emphasizing essentials like cleaners and foods. Recent momentum favors MNST YTD at 1%, over PG’s underperformance and UL’s weakness, yet staples offer lower risk in downturns. Valuation sensitivity is stark: MNST’s 40x P/E premium versus PG (25x) and UL (22x), with yields at 0%, 2.7%, 3.4%. Sector exposure amplifies MNST’s cyclicality against peers’ global defensiveness; sentiment tilts growth to MNST, value to others.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward MNST based on trend consistency from Q4 sales momentum, international catalysts, and relative 1-year outperformance, despite recent pullbacks. Probabilistic edge stems from energy sector positioning versus staples stability, though PG and UL suit risk-averse strategies amid volatility.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MNST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and UL’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MNST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and UL’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +1.32% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +1.22% , and UL (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +0.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2073.90%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
MNST is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
PG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.77% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Household/Personal Care (+0.96% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| MNST | PG | UL | |
| Capitalization | 75B | 341B | 125B |
| EBITDA | 2.53B | 24.5B | 11.3B |
| Gain YTD | 0.065 | 3.254 | -9.822 |
| P/E Ratio | 39.55 | 21.77 | 19.14 |
| Revenue | 8.29B | 85.3B | 59.8B |
| Total Cash | 2.77B | 10.8B | N/A |
| Total Debt | 199M | 36.6B | N/A |
MNST | PG | UL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 51 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 39 Fair valued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 54 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 30 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 60 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 81 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PG's Valuation (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (92) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to UL’s and somewhat faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PG (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (81) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to PG’s and somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.
PG's SMR Rating (30) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as MNST (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for UL (97) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PG (60) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UL (81) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PG (81) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UL (83) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.
| MNST | PG | UL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 34% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 37% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 40% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 10 days ago 45% | 10 days ago 42% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 42% | 5 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 36% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 40% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IWF | 476.41 | 7.18 | +1.53% |
| iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |||
| ILIT | 20.81 | 0.22 | +1.09% |
| iShares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF | |||
| PCEM | 11.93 | N/A | N/A |
| Polen Capital Emerging Markets ex China Growth ETF | |||
| XCOR | 81.99 | N/A | N/A |
| FundX ETF | |||
| IGE | 60.58 | -0.70 | -1.14% |
| iShares North American Natural Res ETF | |||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +1.80% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| KO - MNST | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.88% | ||
More | ||||
PG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.