MP
Price
$54.92
Change
-$1.75 (-3.09%)
Updated
May 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.78B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NB
Price
$4.86
Change
-$0.19 (-3.76%)
Updated
May 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
692.23M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
USAR
Price
$19.96
Change
-$1.30 (-6.11%)
Updated
May 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.45B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MP or NB or USAR

Header iconMP vs NB vs USAR Comparison
Open Charts MP vs NB vs USARBanner chart's image
MP vs NB vs USAR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? MP Materials Corp. (MP) vs. NioCorp Developments Ltd. (NB) vs. USA Rare Earth, Inc. (USAR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • USA Rare Earth (USAR) leads with 119% YTD gains, fueled by a transformative $2.8 billion acquisition of Serra Verde Group, outpacing MP at 32% and NB at 13%.
  • MP Materials, the established rare earth producer at Mountain Pass, benefits from government backing and analyst upgrades, trading at around $66.57 with a $11.8B market cap.
  • NB advances its Elk Creek project with new state tax incentives and offtake agreements, positioning for niobium production amid smaller $854M market cap.
  • All three stocks have surged over 150% in the past year, reflecting sector momentum in U.S. critical minerals supply chains.
  • Development-stage peers NB and USAR carry higher execution risks compared to MP's operational scale.

Introduction

In the push for domestic critical minerals independence, MP Materials Corp., NioCorp Developments Ltd., and USA Rare Earth, Inc. stand out as key U.S.-focused rare earth and specialty metals players. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance, and catalysts amid geopolitical supply chain shifts. Traders eyeing sector volatility and investors seeking exposure to EV, defense, and tech demand will find value in understanding their relative strengths in production readiness, project advancements, and momentum. With shares delivering triple-digit annual gains, the trio highlights opportunities and risks in this strategic market niche.

MP Overview and Recent Performance

MP Materials Corp. operates the Mountain Pass mine, the only scaled rare earth production site in the U.S., focusing on neodymium-praseodymium (NdPr) oxides essential for magnets in electric vehicles and wind turbines. In recent market activity, the stock has climbed around 35% over the past month to approximately $66.57, with YTD gains of 32% and 166% over one year, backed by a $11.8 billion market cap. Sentiment has strengthened from government contracts, including Department of Defense partnerships providing price floors, and positive analyst notes like Wedbush's Outperform rating with a $90 target. Upcoming Q1 earnings and magnet production scaling have driven buying interest, though negative EPS of -0.50 reflects investment-phase losses.

NB Overview and Recent Performance

NioCorp Developments Ltd. is advancing the Elk Creek project in Nebraska, targeting niobium (used in steel alloys), scandium, titanium, and rare earths for high-strength applications in aerospace and defense. Recent weeks saw shares rise about 32% monthly to near $6, with YTD up 13% and 159% annually, on an $854 million market cap. Key boosts include Nebraska legislation enhancing tax incentive flexibility worth up to $200 million over 10 years and a non-binding offtake term sheet with Traxys North America for all planned products. Analyst targets suggest 100%+ upside potential, though EPS of -0.74 underscores pre-production risks.

USAR Overview and Recent Performance

USA Rare Earth, Inc. pursues a mine-to-magnet strategy with projects like Round Top in Texas and a Stillwater facility, emphasizing non-Chinese supply for NdPr and heavy rare earths. The stock has rocketed 68% in the past month to about $26, boasting 119% YTD and 153% one-year returns on a $5.7 billion market cap. A pivotal $2.8 billion acquisition of Brazil's Serra Verde Group in late April propelled a 72% monthly surge, accelerating vertical integration. Production shifts and buy ratings with $36 average targets fuel optimism, despite EPS losses of -3.31.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers from over 350 AI-powered trading bots scanning thousands of tickers for optimal strategies in current conditions. These curated bots employ diverse approaches—short-term scalping, swing trading, or long-term trends—with standout stats like annualized returns from +23% to +162%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. For instance, a volatility-focused bot trading USAR alongside others achieved +162% returns and 75% win rate. Tailored for sectors like critical minerals amid supply chain shifts, they offer risk-managed copy trading. Explore these high-conviction signals to align with market dynamics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MP leads in operational maturity with active mining and refining, contrasting NB and USAR's development focus—NB on Elk Creek niobium ramp-up, USAR via Serra Verde for faster supply. Growth drivers diverge: MP's DoD contracts ensure stability, USAR's acquisition accelerates scale, while NB leverages offtakes. Recent momentum favors USAR's explosive gains over peers' steadier climbs. Risks tilt higher for developers amid permitting and funding hurdles; all share sector exposure to China dominance and EV demand. Valuations lack P/E comparability due to losses, but MP's size implies lower beta sensitivity. Sentiment is bullish across, with institutional flows strongest at MP.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI currently leans toward MP Materials for superior trend consistency, established production at Mountain Pass, and robust government-backed catalysts, positioning it favorably relative to NB and USAR amid volatility. While USAR shows stronger short-term momentum, MP's scale offers higher probability of sustained outperformance in the rare earth rally.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 20, 2026
Stock price -- (MP: $54.93NB: $5.05USAR: $21.27)
Brand notoriety: MP, NB and USAR are all not notable
The three companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MP: 83%, NB: 144%, USAR: 118%
Market capitalization -- MP: $9.78B, NB: $692.23M, USAR: $4.45B
$MP is valued at $9.78B, while NB has a market capitalization of $692.23M, and USAR's market capitalization is $4.45B. The market cap for tickers in this @Other Metals/Minerals ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Other Metals/Minerals industry is $3.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and USAR’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • USAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MP and NB are a better buy in the long-term than USAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and USAR’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • USAR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USAR is a better buy in the short-term than MP and NB.

Price Growth

MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -16.25% price change this week, while NB (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -17.62% , and USAR (@Other Metals/Minerals) price fluctuated -19.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -2.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

MP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-2.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MP($9.78B) has a higher market cap than USAR($4.45B) and NB($692M). USAR YTD gains are higher at: 67.773 vs. MP (8.729) and NB (-8.491). MP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 29.5M vs. NB (-60.03M) and USAR (-242.86M). MP has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. NB (306M) and USAR (258M). NB has less debt than USAR and MP: NB (413K) vs USAR (1.31M) and MP (1B). MP has higher revenues than NB and USAR: MP (254M) vs NB (0) and USAR (0).
MPNBUSAR
Capitalization9.78B692M4.45B
EBITDA29.5M-60.03M-242.86M
Gain YTD8.729-8.49167.773
P/E Ratio770.50N/A20.27
Revenue254M00
Total Cash1.74B306M258M
Total Debt1B413K1.31M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MP vs NB: Fundamental Ratings
MP
NB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6176
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68100
SMR RATING
1..100
9297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NB's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MP (98). This means that NB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MP’s over the last 12 months.

MP's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as NB (100). This means that MP’s stock grew similarly to NB’s over the last 12 months.

MP's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as NB (97). This means that MP’s stock grew similarly to NB’s over the last 12 months.

MP's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as NB (46). This means that MP’s stock grew similarly to NB’s over the last 12 months.

MP's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NB (100). This means that MP’s stock grew significantly faster than NB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPNBUSAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYPIX73.32N/A
N/A
ProFunds Consumer Disctnry Ultra Sec Inv
TPIIX17.11N/A
N/A
Timothy Plan International I
CFJIX37.68N/A
N/A
Calvert US Large Cap Value Rspnb Idx I
IVOIX17.43-0.13
-0.74%
Nomura Mid Cap Income Opps I
NYVTX31.65-0.30
-0.94%
Davis NY Venture A

NB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NB has been loosely correlated with MP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NB jumps, then MP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NB
1D Price
Change %
NB100%
-3.96%
MP - NB
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.07%
UAMY - NB
62%
Loosely correlated
-7.46%
USAR - NB
61%
Loosely correlated
-6.16%
CRML - NB
52%
Loosely correlated
-6.76%
TMC - NB
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.91%
More

USAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USAR has been loosely correlated with MP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USAR jumps, then MP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USAR
1D Price
Change %
USAR100%
-6.16%
MP - USAR
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.07%
NB - USAR
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.96%
UAMY - USAR
58%
Loosely correlated
-7.46%
CRML - USAR
56%
Loosely correlated
-6.76%
TMC - USAR
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.91%
More