MPWR
Price
$1468.35
Change
+$65.54 (+4.67%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
72.12B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NXPI
Price
$216.03
Change
+$2.30 (+1.08%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
54.59B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSEM
Price
$226.45
Change
+$11.70 (+5.45%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
24.59B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MPWR or NXPI or TSEM

Header iconMPWR vs NXPI vs TSEM Comparison
Open Charts MPWR vs NXPI vs TSEMBanner chart's image
MPWR vs NXPI vs TSEM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) vs. NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) vs. Tower Semiconductor (TSEM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MPWR leads with robust revenue growth of 26.4% in 2025, driven by AI and data center demand, alongside strong Q1 2026 guidance exceeding consensus.
  • NXPI shows mixed momentum with Q4 2025 beats but recent 20% share price decline over four weeks, trading at attractive forward P/E amid automotive strength.
  • TSEM delivers exceptional 1-year gains over 200%, fueled by AI networking partnerships and silicon photonics demand, with record quarterly revenues.
  • Year-to-date, MPWR and TSEM outperform with 13-15% gains, while NXPI lags at -13%, reflecting divergent sector exposures in semiconductors.
  • All three benefit from AI tailwinds, but MPWR's power management and TSEM's foundry specialties position them for sustained relative performance versus NXPI's broader mixed-signal focus.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines MPWR, NXPI, and TSEM, three semiconductor firms with exposure to high-growth areas like AI infrastructure, automotive electronics, and power management. These companies operate in the dynamic analog and mixed-signal chip sector, where demand for efficient power solutions and specialized foundry services is accelerating amid data center expansions and electrification trends. Traders seeking momentum plays and investors eyeing long-term sector growth will find value in analyzing their recent performance, valuation sensitivities, and market positioning for informed relative performance decisions in today's volatile environment.

MPWR Overview and Recent Performance

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is a fabless semiconductor firm specializing in high-performance power electronics solutions for enterprise data centers, AI systems, automotive, and consumer applications. In recent market activity, MPWR has demonstrated resilience, with shares trading around $1,050 after strong Q4 2025 results featuring $751 million in revenue, up 20.8% year-over-year, and full-year growth of 26.4% to $2.79 billion. Gross margins held firm at 55%, supported by enterprise data and automotive demand. The company raised its quarterly dividend to $2.00 and guided Q1 2026 revenue at $770-$790 million, surpassing estimates. Sentiment remains optimistic, bolstered by AI-driven power needs, though shares reflect premium valuations amid sector volatility.

NXPI Overview and Recent Performance

NXP Semiconductors N.V., headquartered in the Netherlands, leads in mixed-signal semiconductors for automotive, industrial IoT, mobile, and infrastructure markets, offering microcontrollers, connectivity solutions, and sensors. Recent weeks have seen NXPI shares decline about 20% over four weeks amid broader sector pressures, trading near $190 despite Q4 2025 beats with $3.34 billion revenue up 7% and EPS of $3.35. The firm forecast upbeat Q1 results, citing robust automotive demand and industrial stabilization, while divesting its MEMS business for $900 million. Analyst revisions note undervaluation potential, with earnings growth projected at 18%, though share weakness reflects cyclical risks in end-markets.

TSEM Overview and Recent Performance

Tower Semiconductor Ltd. operates as an independent foundry providing customizable analog and mixed-signal process technologies, including SiGe, SiPho, RF CMOS, and power management for consumer, automotive, and aerospace applications. TSEM shares have surged over 200% in the past year, recently gaining on partnerships like high-speed AI networking with Oriole Networks and record Q4 revenues. With facilities in Israel, the US, and Japan, the company reported 9% full-year 2025 revenue growth to $1.57 billion. Strong silicon photonics and RF infrastructure demand have fueled momentum, with analysts targeting $156-$180, underscoring its role in AI data transmission infrastructure.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. These bots, powered by advanced financial learning models, analyze market conditions to highlight those with the strongest recent metrics—such as annualized returns up to 192%, win rates of 90%+, and profit factors exceeding 2.5 on leveraged ETFs like SOXL in semiconductors. Selected for current relevance, they span growth sectors like AI, aerospace, and industrials, offering copy-trading options with equity charts and performance stats. Explore these high-conviction models to align automated strategies with prevailing trends.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MPWR, NXPI, and TSEM all thrive in analog semiconductors but differ in models: MPWR's fabless power ICs target AI data centers; NXPI's integrated mixed-signal spans automotive and IoT; TSEM's foundry emphasizes custom SiPho and RF. Growth drivers favor MPWR and TSEM via AI catalysts, with 26%+ revenue jumps, versus NXPI's steadier 7-18%. Recent momentum shines for TSEM (200%+ 1Y) and MPWR (80%+), while NXPI lags on pullbacks. Risks include MPWR's high P/E (~80x), NXPI's cyclical autos (~24x P/E), and TSEM's geopolitics. Valuation sensitivity is acute for premium MPWR, with NXPI offering value; sentiment tilts to AI pure-plays amid sector rotation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors MPWR for its consistent trend strength in AI power solutions, superior revenue acceleration, and positive guidance amid data center buildouts. While TSEM shows explosive momentum from photonics catalysts and NXPI trades at compelling valuations, MPWR's stability and relative positioning suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term, based on observable growth metrics and sector tailwinds.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 18, 2026
Stock price -- (MPWR: $1468.35NXPI: $216.03TSEM: $226.44)
Brand notoriety: MPWR and TSEM are not notable and NXPI is notable
The three companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MPWR: 117%, NXPI: 158%, TSEM: 79%
Market capitalization -- MPWR: $72.12B, NXPI: $54.59B, TSEM: $24.59B
$MPWR is valued at $72.12B, while NXPI has a market capitalization of $54.59B, and TSEM's market capitalization is $24.59B. The market cap for tickers in this @Semiconductors ranges from $4.9T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Semiconductors industry is $122.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MPWR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNXPI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and TSEM’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MPWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NXPI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TSEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPWR and NXPI are a better buy in the long-term than TSEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MPWR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NXPI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and TSEM’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MPWR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NXPI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TSEM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MPWR is a better buy in the short-term than TSEM, which in turn is a better option than NXPI.

Price Growth

MPWR (@Semiconductors) experienced а +8.46% price change this week, while NXPI (@Semiconductors) price change was +5.71% , and TSEM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +11.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +11.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

MPWR is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

NXPI is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

TSEM is expected to report earnings on May 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+11.63% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MPWR($72.1B) has a higher market cap than NXPI($54.6B) and TSEM($24.6B). TSEM and MPWR has higher P/E ratio than NXPI: TSEM (116.72) and MPWR (114.18) vs NXPI (27.17). TSEM YTD gains are higher at: 92.846 vs. MPWR (62.329) and NXPI (0.042). NXPI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.96B vs. MPWR (781M) and TSEM (507M). NXPI has more cash in the bank: 2.91B vs. TSEM (1.22B) and MPWR (581M). MPWR has less debt than TSEM and NXPI: MPWR (15.1M) vs TSEM (164M) and NXPI (12.2B). NXPI has higher revenues than MPWR and TSEM: NXPI (12.3B) vs MPWR (2.79B) and TSEM (1.51B).
MPWRNXPITSEM
Capitalization72.1B54.6B24.6B
EBITDA781M3.96B507M
Gain YTD62.3290.04292.846
P/E Ratio114.1827.17116.72
Revenue2.79B12.3B1.51B
Total Cash581M2.91B1.22B
Total Debt15.1M12.2B164M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPWR vs NXPI vs TSEM: Fundamental Ratings
MPWR
NXPI
TSEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
291228
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19823
SMR RATING
1..100
464379
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35034
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2233
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
507550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NXPI's Valuation (12) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for MPWR (84) and is significantly better than the same rating for TSEM (89). This means that NXPI's stock grew significantly faster than MPWR’s and significantly faster than TSEM’s over the last 12 months.

TSEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MPWR (19) and is significantly better than the same rating for NXPI (82). This means that TSEM's stock grew similarly to MPWR’s and significantly faster than NXPI’s over the last 12 months.

NXPI's SMR Rating (43) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MPWR (46) and is somewhat better than the same rating for TSEM (79). This means that NXPI's stock grew similarly to MPWR’s and somewhat faster than TSEM’s over the last 12 months.

MPWR's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TSEM (34) and is somewhat better than the same rating for NXPI (50). This means that MPWR's stock grew similarly to TSEM’s and somewhat faster than NXPI’s over the last 12 months.

MPWR's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TSEM (3) and is in the same range as NXPI (23). This means that MPWR's stock grew similarly to TSEM’s and similarly to NXPI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPWRNXPITSEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MPWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NXPI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IONX48.912.85
+6.19%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF
XJR47.841.12
+2.39%
iShares ESG Select Scrn S&P Small-CapETF
TAXF50.560.16
+0.32%
American Century Divers Muncpl Bd ETF
SUB106.710.07
+0.07%
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bd ETF
JHDV41.93N/A
N/A
JHancock U.S. High Dividend ETF

MPWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPWR has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPWR jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPWR
1D Price
Change %
MPWR100%
+4.67%
KLAC - MPWR
74%
Closely correlated
+3.26%
LRCX - MPWR
73%
Closely correlated
+2.54%
NXPI - MPWR
73%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
AMAT - MPWR
70%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
KLIC - MPWR
70%
Closely correlated
+2.79%
More

TSEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSEM has been loosely correlated with MTSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TSEM jumps, then MTSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSEM
1D Price
Change %
TSEM100%
+5.44%
MTSI - TSEM
64%
Loosely correlated
+5.95%
AMKR - TSEM
61%
Loosely correlated
+7.11%
AMBA - TSEM
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
KLIC - TSEM
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.79%
KLAC - TSEM
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.26%
More