MTSI
Price
$258.11
Change
+$10.40 (+4.20%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
19.36B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MU
Price
$420.59
Change
-$0.92 (-0.22%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
474.31B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RMBS
Price
$110.44
Change
+$4.86 (+4.60%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
11.95B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTSI or MU or RMBS

Header iconMTSI vs MU vs RMBS Comparison
Open Charts MTSI vs MU vs RMBSBanner chart's image
MTSI vs MU vs RMBS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings (MTSI) vs. Micron Technology (MU) vs. Rambus (RMBS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MTSI has delivered strong YTD returns of 26.07% and 1-year gains over 100%, driven by data center and AI connectivity demand, with recent product launches like PCIe 7.0 equalizers boosting sentiment.
  • MU leads with explosive YTD performance at 42.02% and 325% 1-year returns, fueled by AI memory shortages and HBM demand, though recent volatility reflects broader market pressures.
  • RMBS shows modest YTD gains of 2.30% but solid 71% 1-year return, supported by DDR5 interface chips for AI servers, amid valuation concerns and recent pullbacks.
  • All three stocks benefit from semiconductor sector tailwinds in AI and data centers, but MU's scale and growth metrics outpace peers, while MTSI and RMBS offer niche exposure with higher relative valuations.
  • Recent weeks highlight volatility across the group due to market selloffs, yet analyst targets suggest upside: MTSI at $261, MU around $418, RMBS at $119.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines MTSI, MU, and RMBS, three semiconductor firms capitalizing on AI-driven demand for high-performance connectivity, memory, and interface solutions. Operating in the fast-evolving data center and telecom sectors, these companies highlight diverse strategies within the chip industry. Traders seeking short-term momentum from recent product innovations and investors eyeing long-term growth in AI infrastructure will find value in analyzing their relative performance, valuations, and market positioning amid ongoing sector volatility.

MTSI Overview and Recent Performance

MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) designs and manufactures analog semiconductors for RF, microwave, millimeter wave, and optical applications, serving telecom infrastructure, defense, industrial, and data centers. Recent market activity has seen MTSI trading around $216, with a market cap of $16.2B, YTD returns of 26% outperforming the S&P 500, and 1-year gains exceeding 100%. Key influences include Q1 FY2026 revenue of $272M, up 25% year-over-year, driven by record industrial & defense and data center growth. Innovations like the industry-first PCIe 7.0 linear equalizers and participation in the Active Copper Cable MSA have enhanced sentiment, alongside analyst upgrades lifting shares in recent weeks despite broader tech pullbacks.

MU Overview and Recent Performance

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) develops memory and storage products worldwide, including DRAM, NAND, HBM, and SSDs for data centers, PCs, mobiles, and automotive uses. Shares recently hovered near $405, boasting a $456B market cap, YTD returns of 42%, and staggering 325% 1-year appreciation. Performance reflects robust AI demand, with quarterly revenue growth of 57% and EPS expansion of 180%, amid HBM supply constraints favoring producers. Analyst price target hikes, such as Wells Fargo to $470, underscore optimism, though recent weeks brought dips from market-wide inflation and geopolitical concerns impacting tech sentiment.

RMBS Overview and Recent Performance

Rambus Inc. (RMBS) specializes in memory interface chips like DDR5 controllers and silicon IP for security in AI data centers, government, and autos. Trading around $90 with a $9.7B market cap, RMBS posted YTD gains of 2.3% and 71% over one year. Recent activity featured a pullback after Q4 revenue beats but cautious Q1 guidance and CFO departure, offset by AI-focused launches like HBM4E Controller IP and board additions. Product revenue rose 41% annually on DDR5 adoption, supporting sentiment amid valuation scrutiny in recent market fluctuations.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features over 25 curated AI trading bots optimized for current market conditions, drawn from hundreds of bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns up to +216%, win rates reaching 95%, profit factors as high as 25.8, and low drawdowns like $1,576 on multi-ticker portfolios. Timeframes span 5min scalps to 62-day swings, with sector-specific focus on semiconductors, energy, aerospace, and more—employing trend following, hedging, TA, and FA approaches on 1 to 25 tickers. This elite selection highlights top performers for copy trading, helping users adapt to volatile environments like today’s AI and chip rallies. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligning with your timeframe and risk profile.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MTSI, MU, and RMBS share AI data center exposure but diverge in models: MU dominates memory manufacturing at massive scale ($456B cap), versus MTSI’s analog RF/optical components ($16B) and RMBS’s niche interface IP/chips ($10B). Growth drivers favor MU’s 57% revenue surge from HBM, outpacing MTSI’s 25% and RMBS’s DDR5 ramp. Recent momentum shows MU’s superior returns but higher volatility; MTSI offers balanced stability. Risks include supply chain issues for all, with RMBS facing execution post-leadership changes. Valuations reflect contrasts: MU’s forward P/E of 13 signals growth value, versus MTSI’s 50 and RMBS’s premium amid sentiment shifts.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors MU based on trend consistency in AI memory demand, unmatched scale, superior growth rates, and attractive forward valuation positioning it ahead in relative performance. While MTSI shows stable momentum and RMBS niche catalysts, MU’s catalysts like HBM tightness offer higher probabilistic upside in the current environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2026
Stock price -- (MTSI: $258.11MU: $420.59RMBS: $110.44)
Brand notoriety: MTSI and RMBS are not notable and MU is notable
The three companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTSI: 106%, MU: 87%, RMBS: 120%
Market capitalization -- MTSI: $19.36B, MU: $474.31B, RMBS: $11.95B
$MTSI is valued at $19.36B, while MU has a market capitalization of $474.31B, and RMBS's market capitalization is $11.95B. The market cap for tickers in this @Semiconductors ranges from $4.58T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Semiconductors industry is $113.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTSI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and RMBS’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MTSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MU is a better buy in the long-term than RMBS, which in turn is a better option than MTSI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTSI’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and RMBS’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTSI’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTSI is a better buy in the short-term than MU, which in turn is a better option than RMBS.

Price Growth

MTSI (@Semiconductors) experienced а +8.31% price change this week, while MU (@Semiconductors) price change was +14.84% , and RMBS (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +18.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +6.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTSI is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

MU is expected to report earnings on Jul 01, 2026.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+6.73% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MU($474B) has a higher market cap than MTSI($19.4B) and RMBS($11.9B). MTSI has higher P/E ratio than RMBS and MU: MTSI (116.79) vs RMBS (52.34) and MU (19.85). MTSI YTD gains are higher at: 50.695 vs. MU (47.425) and RMBS (20.187). MU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 37.1B vs. RMBS (325M) and MTSI (259M). MU has more cash in the bank: 8.44B vs. MTSI (768M) and RMBS (762M). RMBS has less debt than MTSI and MU: RMBS (25M) vs MTSI (531M) and MU (12.4B). MU has higher revenues than MTSI and RMBS: MU (58.1B) vs MTSI (1.02B) and RMBS (708M).
MTSIMURMBS
Capitalization19.4B474B11.9B
EBITDA259M37.1B325M
Gain YTD50.69547.42520.187
P/E Ratio116.7919.8552.34
Revenue1.02B58.1B708M
Total Cash768M8.44B762M
Total Debt531M12.4B25M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTSI vs MU vs RMBS: Fundamental Ratings
MTSI
MU
RMBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
256617
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
101825
SMR RATING
1..100
581746
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
514314
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MU's Valuation (51) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as RMBS (79) and is in the same range as MTSI (82). This means that MU's stock grew similarly to RMBS’s and similarly to MTSI’s over the last 12 months.

MTSI's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MU (18) and is in the same range as RMBS (25). This means that MTSI's stock grew similarly to MU’s and similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

MU's SMR Rating (17) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as RMBS (46) and is somewhat better than the same rating for MTSI (58). This means that MU's stock grew similarly to RMBS’s and somewhat faster than MTSI’s over the last 12 months.

MU's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTSI (36) and is somewhat better than the same rating for RMBS (40). This means that MU's stock grew somewhat faster than MTSI’s and somewhat faster than RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MU (43) and is somewhat better than the same rating for MTSI (51). This means that RMBS's stock grew similarly to MU’s and somewhat faster than MTSI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTSIMURMBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RMBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASCI35.460.31
+0.89%
abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF
BESF39.150.10
+0.26%
Bastion Energy ETF
FEX126.33-0.41
-0.33%
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® ETF
FDEV36.78-0.13
-0.35%
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
TOLL35.61-0.24
-0.68%
Tema Durable Quality ETF

MTSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTSI has been closely correlated with SITM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTSI jumps, then SITM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTSI
1D Price
Change %
MTSI100%
+4.20%
SITM - MTSI
71%
Closely correlated
+3.35%
KLAC - MTSI
70%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
LRCX - MTSI
70%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
VECO - MTSI
68%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
AMKR - MTSI
68%
Closely correlated
+5.11%
More

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
+4.60%
LRCX - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
AMKR - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+5.11%
KLIC - RMBS
76%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
VECO - RMBS
75%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
KLAC - RMBS
74%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
More