This comparison examines MTSI, NVTS, and ON, three semiconductor firms specializing in analog, RF, and power solutions critical for data centers, telecom, automotive, and defense. Investors tracking sector rotations amid AI infrastructure buildout and supply chain shifts will find value in their contrasting profiles: established leaders versus high-growth challengers. Recent market activity highlights relative momentum, valuation trade-offs, and exposure to booming end-markets like 5G/6G and electrification, aiding decisions on portfolio positioning in volatile conditions.
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) designs high-performance analog semiconductors for RF, microwave, and optical applications in telecom, defense, and data centers. With a market cap of $15.6B and shares trading around $207 (52-week range: $84-$259), MTSI has delivered YTD returns of 21% and 100% over one year. Recent weeks saw volatility, including a 9% single-day drop amid broader semi weakness, but shares surged post-Q1 FY26 results with $272M revenue (up sharply y/y) fueled by record industrial/defense and data center growth. In-line earnings and upbeat outlook boosted sentiment, with forward P/E at 53x reflecting optimism in 5G, satellite, and AI-driven demand. Strong cash position ($769M) and low debt support resilience.
Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS) focuses on next-gen GaN and SiC power ICs for AI data centers, EVs, and consumer electronics, operating from Torrance, CA. Market cap stands at $1.9B, with shares at $8.20 (52-week: $1.52-$17.79), posting YTD +15% and 1-year +229% amid speculative fervor. Recent performance mixed: Q4 FY25 revenue fell 59% y/y to $7.3M with losses in-line, but shares popped on AI pivot announcements like solid-state transformers and GaN sampling for data centers. CFO exit noted, yet strategic high-power focus and partnerships (e.g., EPFL, GlobalFoundries) drive sentiment. Elevated P/S of 40x underscores growth risks versus rewards in emerging power tech.
ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON), or onsemi, supplies power, sensing, and analog solutions for automotive, industrial, and AI data centers from Scottsdale, AZ. As the largest here at $22.9B market cap, shares hover at $57 (52-week: $31-$74), with YTD +5% and 1-year +30%. Recent quarters showed Q4 revenue resilience at $1.53B despite -11% y/y dip, with EPS beating estimates; shares pulled back but analyst upgrades highlight margin refocus and cash generation. Forward P/E of 20x appears compelling versus peers, bolstered by $2.6B cash and automotive/industrial exposure, though softer industrial demand tempers momentum.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, each scanning thousands of tickers with diverse strategies like day trading, swing, and sector-specific plays across semiconductors, ETFs, and more. Only those excelling in current volatility—boasting annualized returns up to 218%, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors to 25x—earn a spot, adapting via machine learning to momentum shifts and rotations. Stats highlight low-drawdown performers in semis and AI themes, with equity charts and real-time P/L transparency. Traders can filter by risk, timeframe, or sector to copy signals, potentially enhancing relative performance analysis. Explore the curated selection for market-suited bots today.
MTSI, NVTS, and ON share semiconductor roots but diverge in scale and focus: MTSI targets niche RF/optical for defense/data centers (24% rev growth), NVTS bets on disruptive GaN/SiC for AI power (volatile growth, losses), while ON spans broad power/sensing for autos/industrials (stable scale, $6B rev). Momentum favors MTSI's 100% 1-yr gain over ON's 30% and NVTS's speculative surges; risks include NVTS's negative margins (-255%) versus MTSI/ON profitability. Valuation contrasts sharply—MTSI P/S 17x, NVTS 40x, ON 4x—with ON's lower forward P/E suiting value plays, MTSI growth premiums. Sector tailwinds like AI/data centers unite them, but trade-offs pit NVTS upside against ON stability and MTSI catalysts.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors MTSI for its trend consistency in recent market activity, blending strong revenue momentum, profitability, and data center/defense catalysts amid semi volatility. Relative to NVTS's high-beta risks and ON's steadier but slower positioning, MTSI shows higher probability of outperformance based on observable growth and sentiment shifts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTSI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNVTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and ON’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTSI’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and ON’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
MTSI (@Semiconductors) experienced а +8.31% price change this week, while NVTS (@Semiconductors) price change was +8.41% , and ON (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +10.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +6.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.
MTSI is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.
NVTS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2026.
ON is expected to report earnings on May 04, 2026.
The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| MTSI | NVTS | ON | |
| Capitalization | 19.4B | 2.2B | 27B |
| EBITDA | 259M | -67.33M | 888M |
| Gain YTD | 50.695 | 33.613 | 26.777 |
| P/E Ratio | 116.79 | N/A | 236.72 |
| Revenue | 1.02B | 45.9M | 6B |
| Total Cash | 768M | 237M | 2.55B |
| Total Debt | 531M | 6.47M | 3.01B |
MTSI | ON | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 8 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTSI's Valuation (82) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as ON (87). This means that MTSI’s stock grew similarly to ON’s over the last 12 months.
MTSI's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ON (74). This means that MTSI’s stock grew somewhat faster than ON’s over the last 12 months.
MTSI's SMR Rating (58) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as ON (88). This means that MTSI’s stock grew similarly to ON’s over the last 12 months.
ON's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MTSI (36). This means that ON’s stock grew similarly to MTSI’s over the last 12 months.
ON's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTSI (51). This means that ON’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTSI’s over the last 12 months.
| MTSI | NVTS | ON | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 6 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 70% | 13 days ago 86% | 13 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTSI has been closely correlated with SITM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTSI jumps, then SITM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTSI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTSI | 100% | +4.20% | ||
| SITM - MTSI | 71% Closely correlated | +3.35% | ||
| KLAC - MTSI | 70% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| LRCX - MTSI | 70% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| VECO - MTSI | 68% Closely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| AMKR - MTSI | 68% Closely correlated | +5.11% | ||
More | ||||