Advertisement
MTZ or MYRG or PWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) vs. MYR Group, Inc. (MYRG) vs. Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- All three stocks—MTZ, MYRG, and PWR—operate in the infrastructure construction sector, benefiting from demand in power delivery, clean energy, and grid modernization.
- Recent quarters showed record revenues and backlogs: MTZ up 34% revenue to $3.8B, MYRG up 20% to $1B, PWR up 26% to $7.9B, with raised full-year guidance across the board.
- Year-to-date performance leaders: MYRG ~114%, MTZ ~101%, PWR ~83%, far outpacing the S&P 500's ~6%.
- Backlogs signal visibility: MTZ $20.3B, MYRG $2.84B, PWR record $48.5B.
- Recent momentum post-earnings: Sharp gains driven by beats on revenue and EPS, reflecting sector tailwinds like electrification and renewables.
- Valuations elevated with high P/E ratios, but growth prospects in infrastructure spending support relative performance.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines MTZ, MYRG, and PWR, three key players in the infrastructure engineering and construction sector focused on power, utilities, and clean energy projects. These companies are riding a wave of investments in grid upgrades, renewable energy, and data center expansions amid the energy transition. Traders seeking short-term momentum from earnings catalysts and investors eyeing long-term sector growth will find value in analyzing their relative performance, backlogs, and market positioning in the current environment.
MTZ Overview and Recent Performance
MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) is an infrastructure engineering and construction firm providing services in communications, clean energy, power delivery, pipeline infrastructure, and other segments primarily in the U.S. and Canada. In recent market activity, MTZ shares have surged, with year-to-date gains exceeding 100% and strong monthly advances around 24%. This momentum follows a record Q1 2026, where revenue rose 34% year-over-year to $3.8 billion, adjusted EBITDA climbed 73% to $284 million, and adjusted diluted EPS increased 174% to $1.39, beating expectations. An 18-month backlog hit $20.3 billion, up 28% year-over-year, driven by clean energy and pipeline growth. Sentiment has improved on raised full-year guidance to $17.5 billion in revenue, though higher leverage introduces some volatility.
MYRG Overview and Recent Performance
MYR Group, Inc. (MYRG) specializes in electrical construction services through its Transmission & Distribution (T&D) and Commercial & Industrial (C&I) segments, serving utilities, renewables, and data centers across the U.S. and Canada. Recent weeks have seen explosive gains, with shares up sharply post-earnings and year-to-date returns topping 114%. Q1 2026 revenue reached a record $1 billion, up 20% year-over-year, with net income doubling to $47 million and diluted EPS rising 106% to $2.99, surpassing estimates. Gross margins expanded to 13.4%, EBITDA hit $82 million, and backlog grew to $2.84 billion. Positive sentiment stems from strong execution, debt reduction to near-zero, and demand in T&D and C&I, though project inefficiencies pose minor risks.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) delivers comprehensive infrastructure solutions for electric power, renewables, communications, pipelines, and energy, operating globally with a focus on North America. In recent market activity, PWR has advanced robustly, with year-to-date gains around 83% and monthly rises near 34%. Q1 2026 revenue jumped 26% to $7.9 billion, adjusted EBITDA reached $686 million, and adjusted diluted EPS rose 50% to $2.68, exceeding forecasts. Record total backlog of $48.5 billion and remaining performance obligations of $26.2 billion underscore visibility. Raised 2026 guidance to $34.7–$35.2 billion in revenue reflects broad demand, though scale brings execution complexities.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from its library of over 350 bots that scan thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for current market conditions—based on real-time performance in volatile sectors like semiconductors, industrials, renewables, and infrastructure—earn a spot among the 25+ featured trending robots. These bots deliver impressive stats, including annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 70–88%, and profit factors exceeding 11 in short timeframes like 15–60 minutes. Employing strategies such as trend analysis, AI/ML pattern recognition, take-profit/stop-loss corridors, and multi-agent systems handling 3–18 tickers, they adapt to momentum in high-growth areas. Traders can explore these for copy trading signals via Tickeron’s brokerage agents. Visit Trending AI Robots to review top performers and subscribe for real-time insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
MTZ, MYRG, and PWR share exposure to infrastructure tailwinds like grid hardening and renewables but differ in scale and focus. Business models: PWR’s vast operations ($30B+ revenue) offer diversification across electric, underground utilities, and global projects; MTZ balances communications, pipelines, and clean energy; MYRG specializes in electrical T&D and C&I. Growth drivers align on electrification, with PWR’s massive backlog providing longest visibility, while MYRG excels in margin expansion. Recent momentum favors MYRG (highest YTD), but all posted post-earnings surges. Risks: MTZ’s higher debt/equity (~84%) vs. MYRG’s near-zero; PWR trades at premium P/E (~104). Valuation sensitivity high across elevated multiples; sentiment bullish on sector catalysts but sensitive to project delays.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently favor MYRG for its superior trend consistency, explosive recent momentum with top YTD gains and record margins, low debt providing stability, and strong backlog conversion amid electrical infrastructure demand. While PWR offers scale and MTZ broad catalysts, MYRG shows higher probabilistic near-term outperformance based on relative positioning.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMYRG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PWR’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- MTZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MYRG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTZ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MYRG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and PWR’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MTZ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MYRG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while MYRG (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +6.76% , and PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price fluctuated +3.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
MYRG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-2.94% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| MTZ | MYRG | PWR | |
| Capitalization | 32.8B | 7.28B | 116B |
| EBITDA | 1.22B | 266M | 2.71B |
| Gain YTD | 90.873 | 113.941 | 82.520 |
| P/E Ratio | 72.66 | 51.54 | 105.62 |
| Revenue | 15.3B | 3.83B | 30.1B |
| Total Cash | 274M | 163M | 365M |
| Total Debt | 3.02B | 61.5M | 6.32B |
MTZ | MYRG | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 20 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 5 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 42 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 35 | 3 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 81 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MYRG's Valuation (85) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (91) and is in the same range as PWR (93). This means that MYRG's stock grew similarly to MTZ’s and similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (5) and is in the same range as MTZ (5). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to MYRG’s and similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MYRG's SMR Rating (42) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (58) and is in the same range as PWR (60). This means that MYRG's stock grew similarly to MTZ’s and similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (35) and is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (36). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to MYRG’s and somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (25) and is significantly better than the same rating for MYRG (81). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to MTZ’s and significantly faster than MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
| MTZ | MYRG | PWR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | N/A | 6 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A | 6 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A | 6 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 76% | 10 days ago 66% | 9 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BELT | 40.06 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF | |||
| DFEB | 50.08 | -0.13 | -0.26% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Feb | |||
| TOPT | 33.96 | -0.46 | -1.34% |
| iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF | |||
| FEZ | 64.95 | -1.39 | -2.10% |
| State Street® SPDR® EURO STOXX 50® ETF | |||
| MRNY | 15.93 | -0.44 | -2.69% |
| YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
MTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | 100% | -4.57% | ||
| PWR - MTZ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| MYRG - MTZ | 74% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| FIX - MTZ | 73% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| DY - MTZ | 68% Closely correlated | -3.02% | ||
| IESC - MTZ | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
More | ||||
PWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | 100% | -1.29% | ||
| MTZ - PWR | 79% Closely correlated | -4.57% | ||
| MYRG - PWR | 79% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| FIX - PWR | 76% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| IESC - PWR | 67% Closely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| EME - PWR | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
More | ||||