MU
Price
$448.42
Change
-$6.65 (-1.46%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
505.7B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NVDA
Price
$202.06
Change
+$0.38 (+0.19%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
4.91T
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NVTS
Price
$13.20
Change
+$0.88 (+7.14%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Capitalization
3.05B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MU or NVDA or NVTS

Header iconMU vs NVDA vs NVTS Comparison
Open Charts MU vs NVDA vs NVTSBanner chart's image
MU vs NVDA vs NVTS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Micron Technology (MU) vs. NVIDIA (NVDA) vs. Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MU leads with robust YTD gains of nearly 30%, driven by AI memory demand and addition to the S&P 100, trading at a PE of 35.20 with a market cap over $416B.
  • NVDA dominates AI infrastructure with a $4.3T market cap and PE of 36.22, but shows modest YTD performance amid market rotations, supported by strong data center growth.
  • NVTS offers high growth potential in power semiconductors for AI data centers, with YTD returns around 15% and a smaller $1.9B market cap, though unprofitable with negative EPS.
  • All three benefit from AI tailwinds, but MU and NVDA exhibit greater scale and profitability compared to emerging player NVTS.
  • Recent volatility reflects sector-wide pressures, yet AI catalysts like HBM demand for MU and GPU leadership for NVDA sustain positive sentiment.
  • Valuation contrasts highlight MU's relative attractiveness versus NVDA's premium, while NVTS trades on future AI power efficiency potential.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines MU, NVDA, and NVTS amid the semiconductor sector's AI-driven expansion. These companies play pivotal roles in memory solutions, GPU computing, and power management, respectively, fueling data centers and high-performance applications. Traders seeking momentum in AI infrastructure and investors eyeing long-term growth in chips will find value in analyzing their relative performance, business models, and market positioning. Recent market activity underscores shifts in sentiment, with AI demand offsetting broader volatility.

MU Overview and Recent Performance

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) is a leading provider of memory and storage solutions, including DRAM, NAND, and high-bandwidth memory (HBM) critical for AI workloads. In recent market activity, MU shares have experienced volatility, with a notable pullback from highs near $455 amid sector pressures, yet maintaining strong YTD gains of about 30%. Key influences include its addition to the S&P 100 index and shipment of industry-first 256GB SOCAMM2 DRAM modules for AI infrastructure, signaling robust demand. Pricing power from memory shortages and sold-out HBM capacity have bolstered sentiment, despite geopolitical tensions impacting chip stocks. With a market cap exceeding $416 billion, PE ratio of 35.20, and beta of 1.54, MU reflects balanced growth in compute and networking segments.

NVDA Overview and Recent Performance

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) leads in accelerated computing, with its GPUs powering AI data centers through Compute & Networking and Graphics segments. Recent weeks have seen modest YTD performance around 5%, with shares consolidating amid valuation debates and market rotations away from megacaps. Strong Q4 revenue growth of 78% year-over-year to $39.3 billion, driven by data center demand and Blackwell ramp-up, underpins resilience. Partnerships for advanced lasers in AI infrastructure and robust guidance sustain positive momentum, even as gross margins face temporary pressure from new launches. Trading at a $4.3 trillion market cap, PE of 36.22, and beta of 2.38, NVDA's scale positions it centrally in AI expansion.

NVTS Overview and Recent Performance

Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS) specializes in gallium nitride (GaN) and silicon carbide (SiC) power semiconductors for efficient conversion in AI data centers, EVs, and consumer devices. Recent performance shows YTD gains of roughly 15%, with volatility including pops from AI-focused announcements like solid-state transformers for 800V DC AI setups and exhibitions at APEC 2026. Q4 revenues of $7.3 million reflected a strategic pivot from low-margin mobile to high-power AI markets, amid CFO transition and ongoing losses (EPS -0.57). With a $1.9 billion market cap, high beta of 3.21, and no PE due to unprofitability, NVTS appeals to growth-oriented traders eyeing its NVIDIA partnerships and sector exposure.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only those excelling in current volatility—such as low, medium, or high—earn a spot, with AI analysis highlighting promising ones by sector like semiconductors (e.g., SOXL bots at +102% annualized returns, 70% win rates) and multi-ticker portfolios blending AI, energy, and tech. Stats show annualized returns up to +218%, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors exceeding 4.0 in trending agents, including semiconductor-focused systems with 69% win rates. These bots vary in style, from 5-minute scalps to 60-minute swings, offering copy-trading signals. Explore the page to identify bots suited to today’s AI-driven markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MU, NVDA, and NVTS share AI exposure but diverge in business models: MU focuses on memory (HBM for AI training), NVDA on GPUs and networking (90% data center revenue), and NVTS on power efficiency (GaN/SiC for 800V systems). Growth drivers contrast sharply—MU and NVDA report triple-digit revenue surges from AI demand, while NVTS pivots amid declining mobile sales but eyes high-margin data centers. Recent momentum favors MU's 30% YTD over NVDA's flat and NVTS's 15%, though NVDA's scale dwarfs others. Risk factors include NVTS's losses and high beta (3.21 vs. MU's 1.54, NVDA's 2.38), cyclical memory for MU, and competition for NVDA. Valuation sensitivity shows MU and NVDA at similar PEs (~35-36), far ahead of unprofitable NVTS; sector ties amplify AI sentiment shifts across all.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI leans toward MU in the current environment, citing its trend consistency from sold-out HBM supply, S&P 100 inclusion, and superior YTD positioning relative to NVDA's consolidation and NVTS's execution risks. Observable catalysts like AI memory demand and balanced valuation enhance probabilistic outperformance, though NVDA's infrastructure dominance offers stability.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (MU: $448.42NVDA: $202.06NVTS: $13.20)
Brand notoriety: MU and NVDA are notable and NVTS is not notable
The three companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MU: 77%, NVDA: 67%, NVTS: 168%
Market capitalization -- MU: $505.7B, NVDA: $4.91T, NVTS: $3.05B
$MU is valued at $505.7B, while NVDA has a market capitalization of $4.91T, and NVTS's market capitalization is $3.05B. The market cap for tickers in this @Semiconductors ranges from $4.91T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Semiconductors industry is $122.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNVDA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and NVTS’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NVDA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NVTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MU is a better buy in the long-term than NVDA, which in turn is a better option than NVTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVDA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and NVTS’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NVDA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NVTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NVTS is a better buy in the short-term than MU and NVDA.

Price Growth

MU (@Semiconductors) experienced а +5.12% price change this week, while NVDA (@Semiconductors) price change was +6.73% , and NVTS (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +34.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +10.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

MU is expected to report earnings on Jul 01, 2026.

NVDA is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2026.

NVTS is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+10.22% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NVDA($4.91T) has a higher market cap than MU($506B) and NVTS($3.05B). NVDA has higher P/E ratio than MU and NVTS: NVDA (41.24) vs MU (21.16) and NVTS (). NVTS YTD gains are higher at: 84.874 vs. MU (57.180) and NVDA (8.349). NVDA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 145B vs. MU (37.1B) and NVTS (-67.33M). NVDA has more cash in the bank: 62.6B vs. MU (14.6B) and NVTS (237M). NVTS has less debt than MU and NVDA: NVTS (6.47M) vs MU (10.8B) and NVDA (11B). NVDA has higher revenues than MU and NVTS: NVDA (216B) vs MU (58.1B) and NVTS (45.9M).
MUNVDANVTS
Capitalization506B4.91T3.05B
EBITDA37.1B145B-67.33M
Gain YTD57.1808.34984.874
P/E Ratio21.1641.24N/A
Revenue58.1B216B45.9M
Total Cash14.6B62.6B237M
Total Debt10.8B11B6.47M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MU vs NVDA: Fundamental Ratings
MU
NVDA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
724
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
168
SMR RATING
1..100
2313
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3513
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3440
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MU's Valuation (52) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as NVDA (78). This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to NVDA’s over the last 12 months.

NVDA's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MU (16). This means that NVDA’s stock grew similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

NVDA's SMR Rating (13) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MU (23). This means that NVDA’s stock grew similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

NVDA's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MU (35). This means that NVDA’s stock grew similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

MU's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as NVDA (40). This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to NVDA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MUNVDANVTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NVDA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NVTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDZ21.130.45
+2.18%
Direxion Daily MSCI Em Mkts Bear 3X ETF
ASGM30.130.12
+0.40%
Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF
BSMV21.060.01
+0.05%
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Muncpl Bd ETF
VTV204.250.01
N/A
Vanguard Value ETF
SCHQ31.58-0.02
-0.06%
Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF

NVTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVTS has been loosely correlated with IFNNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NVTS jumps, then IFNNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVTS
1D Price
Change %
NVTS100%
+7.14%
IFNNY - NVTS
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
TOELY - NVTS
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
PENG - NVTS
43%
Loosely correlated
+5.09%
AAOI - NVTS
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
COHU - NVTS
41%
Loosely correlated
+7.30%
More