MU
Price
$455.07
Change
-$2.16 (-0.47%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
513.2B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TEL
Price
$246.14
Change
+$9.66 (+4.08%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
72.23B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSM
Price
$370.50
Change
+$7.15 (+1.97%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.67T
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MU or TEL or TSM

Header iconMU vs TEL vs TSM Comparison
Open Charts MU vs TEL vs TSMBanner chart's image
MU vs TEL vs TSM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Micron Technology (MU) vs. TE Connectivity (TEL) vs. Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MU has delivered approximately 48% YTD gains, fueled by record Q2 revenue of $23.86 billion and AI-driven memory demand, though recent volatility persists post-earnings.
  • TEL shows mixed performance with a 30-day return of +16.9% but lags YTD at around -14%, supported by a 10% dividend hike to $0.78 and AI data center growth.
  • TSM trades with YTD gains near 10%, backed by strong AI chip demand, though recent market pressures have tempered momentum with a monthly decline of about 9.5%.
  • All three benefit from semiconductor and connectivity trends in AI infrastructure, with MU leading in growth velocity, TSM in scale (market cap $1.7T), and TEL offering stability via shareholder returns.
  • Recent earnings beats across the board highlight relative strength, but capex concerns and geopolitical risks weigh on sentiment for memory and foundry plays.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines MU (Micron Technology), TEL (TE Connectivity), and TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing), key players in the semiconductor ecosystem powering AI and data center expansion. These companies represent diverse angles—memory chips, electronic connectors, and advanced foundry services—amid surging demand for high-performance computing. Traders seeking momentum in volatile tech sectors and investors eyeing long-term AI exposure will find value in analyzing their recent performance, growth drivers, and relative positioning in today's market environment.

MU Overview and Recent Performance

Micron Technology (MU), a leading provider of DRAM and NAND memory solutions, has seen robust demand from AI data centers and high-bandwidth memory (HBM) applications. In recent market activity, the stock experienced volatility following stellar fiscal Q2 results, with record revenue of $23.86 billion and adjusted EPS of $12.20, surpassing estimates. This drove a 30% dividend increase, signaling confidence in free cash flow generation. YTD gains hover around 48%, with a trailing P/E of about 20 and market cap near $477 billion. Sentiment has been buoyed by AI tailwinds, though elevated capex plans for capacity expansion introduced short-term pressure, contributing to a recent pullback from highs near $471.

TEL Overview and Recent Performance

TE Connectivity (TEL), a global leader in connectors and sensors for industrial, automotive, and data center applications, benefits from AI infrastructure buildout. Recent weeks showed a strong 30-day rebound of +16.9%, alongside a 10% quarterly dividend hike to $0.78 per share and a $3 billion buyback expansion, reflecting solid financial health. Despite YTD pressure around -14%, the company reported upbeat Q1 results with 22% sales growth to $4.7 billion and record orders exceeding $5 billion. Trading at a market cap of about $60 billion, TEL's performance reflects resilience in core markets, tempered by supply disruptions and softer industrial demand.

TSM Overview and Recent Performance

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM), the world's largest contract chipmaker, dominates advanced node production critical for AI chips. Recent performance includes YTD gains of roughly 10%, with a trailing P/E around 32 and a massive $1.7 trillion market cap. Amid broader sector rotation, the stock faced monthly declines near 9.5%, influenced by geopolitical tensions and export order softness. Strong fundamentals persist, with revenue growth projected at 29% for the year and high utilization in AI-related fabs. Investor sentiment balances growth prospects against risks like regional instability, supporting steady positioning relative to peers.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots out of over 350 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These curated bots are selected based on real-time AI analysis for superior performance in current market conditions, featuring annualized returns from +15% to +188%, win rates of 55-89%, and profit factors up to 6.11. Semiconductor-focused bots, like those on SOXL and multi-ticker strategies including ASML and LRCX, have posted +90-112% returns with 67-70% win rates on short timeframes such as 5-60 minutes. Employing diverse strategies like trend following, hedging, and multi-agent intelligence, they adapt to volatility in growth sectors. Explore these high-performing bots tailored to today's trends for potential edge in automated trading.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MU, TEL, and TSM operate in interconnected semiconductor supply chains, with MU focusing on memory, TEL on connectivity components, and TSM on wafer fabrication. Growth drivers diverge: MU's AI memory boom yields 99% revenue growth outlook, outpacing TSM's 29% and TEL's steadier industrial/AI mix. Recent momentum favors MU (48% YTD) over TSM (10%) and TEL (-14%), but TSM offers scale stability. Risks include MU and TSM's cyclical exposure and capex intensity versus TEL's diversified end-markets. Valuation sensitivity shows MU at lower P/E (~20), while sentiment tilts toward AI pure-plays amid sector rotation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward MU for its superior trend consistency in recent weeks, explosive earnings growth, and leading relative performance in AI memory demand. With higher projected revenue acceleration and attractive valuation, it shows probabilistic edge over TSM's steady foundry dominance and TEL's defensive returns, though all remain positioned for sector catalysts.

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2026
Stock price -- (MU: $455.07TEL: $246.14TSM: $370.50)
Brand notoriety: MU and TSM are notable and TEL is not notable
MU and TSM are part of the Semiconductors industry, and TEL is in the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MU: 80%, TEL: 152%, TSM: 139%
Market capitalization -- MU: $513.2B, TEL: $72.23B, TSM: $1.67T
$MU [@Semiconductors] is valued at $513.2B. $TSM’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $ $1.67T. $TEL [@Electronic Components] has a market capitalization of $ $72.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $ $4.9T to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $ $185.72B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $ $122.84B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $ $11.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTEL’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s), and TSM’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TEL’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • TSM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TSM is a better buy in the long-term than MU and TEL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and TSM’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TEL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TEL is a better buy in the short-term than MU and TSM.

Price Growth

MU (@Semiconductors) experienced а +8.20% price change this week, while TEL (@Electronic Components) price change was +7.12% , and TSM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated -0.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +11.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.53%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +4.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

MU is expected to report earnings on Jul 01, 2026.

TEL is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2026.

TSM is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+11.63% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

@Electronic Components (+4.81% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSM($1.67T) has a higher market cap than MU($513B) and TEL($72.2B). TEL has higher P/E ratio than TSM and MU: TEL (35.47) vs TSM (31.83) and MU (21.48). MU YTD gains are higher at: 59.511 vs. TSM (22.602) and TEL (8.520). TSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.74T vs. MU (37.1B) and TEL (4.47B). MU has more cash in the bank: 14.6B vs. TEL (1.25B) and TSM (). TEL has less debt than MU and TSM: TEL (5.71B) vs MU (10.8B) and TSM (). TSM has higher revenues than MU and TEL: TSM (3.81T) vs MU (58.1B) and TEL (18.1B).
MUTELTSM
Capitalization513B72.2B1.67T
EBITDA37.1B4.47B2.74T
Gain YTD59.5118.52022.602
P/E Ratio21.4835.4731.83
Revenue58.1B18.1B3.81T
Total Cash14.6B1.25BN/A
Total Debt10.8B5.71BN/A
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MU vs TEL vs TSM: Fundamental Ratings
MU
TEL
TSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
153926
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16189
SMR RATING
1..100
235126
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
351039
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
341620
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TEL's Valuation (26) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TSM (46) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as MU (52) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TEL's stock grew similarly to TSM’s and similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

TSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as MU (16) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as TEL (18) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TSM's stock grew similarly to MU’s and similarly to TEL’s over the last 12 months.

MU's SMR Rating (23) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TSM (26) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as TEL (51) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that MU's stock grew similarly to TSM’s and similarly to TEL’s over the last 12 months.

TEL's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as MU (35) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as TSM (39) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TEL's stock grew similarly to MU’s and similarly to TSM’s over the last 12 months.

TEL's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TSM (20) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as MU (34) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TEL's stock grew similarly to TSM’s and similarly to MU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MUTELTSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TEL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LULG14.370.77
+5.68%
Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF
ROM105.062.92
+2.86%
ProShares Ultra Technology
QQQ648.858.38
+1.31%
Invesco QQQ Trust
SIXP32.780.18
+0.57%
AllianzIM US Equity 6M Bfr10 Mar/Sep ETF
SDOW28.89-1.62
-5.31%
ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

TEL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEL has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEL jumps, then APH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TEL
1D Price
Change %
TEL100%
+4.08%
APH - TEL
66%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
FLEX - TEL
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
KN - TEL
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
JBL - TEL
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.74%
FN - TEL
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.56%
More