Advertisement
MYRG or PWR or STRL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) vs. Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) vs. Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- STRL leads with explosive YTD gains over 160%, driven by e-infrastructure and data center demand, outpacing MYRG's 114% and PWR's 83% returns.
- All three reported strong Q1 2026 results: MYRG revenue up 20% to $1B with record $2.84B backlog; PWR up 26% to $7.87B; STRL up 92% to $826M.
- PWR offers scale with $116B market cap and diversified energy infrastructure exposure, while mid-caps MYRG ($7.3B) and STRL ($24.7B) show higher growth volatility.
- Recent momentum favors STRL and MYRG post-earnings, with shares surging 52% and 25% respectively in recent weeks amid infrastructure tailwinds.
- Trailing P/E ratios reflect premium valuations: STRL ~54x, MYRG ~52x, PWR ~104x, signaling market expectations for sustained expansion.
- Backlogs underscore visibility: MYRG $2.84B, PWR RPOs $26.2B, STRL benefiting from acquisitions like CEC Facilities Group.
Introduction
In the surging infrastructure sector, MYRG, PWR, and STRL stand out as key players in electrical construction and civil engineering. These firms capitalize on electrification trends, data center builds, renewable energy projects, and grid upgrades. Traders seeking momentum in high-growth industrials and investors eyeing long-term infrastructure spending will find this comparison valuable for assessing relative performance, valuation sensitivity, and market positioning in the current environment.
MYRG Overview and Recent Performance
MYRG (MYR Group Inc.) specializes in electrical construction across transmission and distribution (T&D) and commercial & industrial (C&I) segments, serving utilities, data centers, and clean energy projects in the U.S. and Canada. In recent market activity, shares have delivered over 114% YTD returns and 206% over one year, hitting new 52-week highs near $470. Q1 2026 results showed record revenue of $1 billion (up 20% YoY), net income of $46.8 million (EPS $2.99, beating estimates by 43%), and EBITDA of $81.5 million, with gross margins expanding to 13.4%. Backlog reached a record $2.84 billion, up 8% YoY, fueled by T&D demand and C&I fixed-price contracts. Sentiment has shifted positively on margin improvements (T&D 9.7%, C&I 8.1%) and electrification tailwinds, though volatility persists with beta around 1.3.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) is a leading infrastructure solutions provider for electric power, renewables, underground utilities, and communications, operating over 200 subsidiaries across North America. Recent performance includes 83% YTD gains and 139% over one year, with shares trading around $772. Q1 2026 revenue climbed 26% to $7.87 billion (beating estimates by 13%), adjusted EPS rose 51% to $2.68 (surpassing by 31%), supported by strong execution in electric power and renewables. Remaining performance obligations (RPOs, akin to backlog) stood at $26.2 billion, signaling robust visibility. Positive sentiment stems from utility demand, data centers, and raised 2026 guidance, though as a large-cap ($116B market cap), it exhibits lower volatility compared to peers.
STRL Overview and Recent Performance
STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) delivers e-infrastructure, transportation, and building solutions, with emphasis on data centers, highways, and civil works via subsidiaries like Texas Sterling Construction. Shares have rocketed over 160% YTD and 388% over one year, reaching highs near $806 amid post-earnings surges. Q1 2026 revenue jumped 92% to $825.7 million (beating by 41%), adjusted EPS $3.59 (up from $1.63, exceeding estimates by 57%), boosted by the CEC Facilities Group acquisition contributing $156 million. Strong momentum reflects e-infrastructure demand and project wins, though higher beta amplifies risks from project delays and execution in a competitive landscape.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from a total of 351 bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ AI-driven strategies like trend analysis, momentum rotation, and risk-managed signals (e.g., 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss corridors) on timeframes from 5min to 60min, targeting sectors such as semiconductors, industrials, data centers, and infrastructure. Performance stats highlight annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors to 11.7, with examples like a 60min bot on USAR/SMR/CIFR at +169% and data center plays showing profit-to-drawdown ratios over 17. Diverse styles suit various risk appetites; explore the page to identify bots aligned with current market conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
MYRG, PWR, and STRL operate in overlapping electrical and infrastructure niches but differ in scale and focus. PWR's broad model spans electric power, renewables, and pipelines, driving diversified revenue ($30B+ TTM) but higher P/E (~104x) reflective of its $116B market cap stability. MYRG emphasizes T&D/C&I electrical work with balanced backlog growth, while STRL leans into high-growth e-infrastructure and civil, enabling outsized revenue jumps via acquisitions. Recent momentum tilts to STRL (52% post-Q1 surge) and MYRG (25%+), versus PWR's steadier climbs, amid shared catalysts like grid upgrades and data centers. Risks include project delays and labor shortages; STRL's smaller size (~$25B cap) heightens volatility, PWR offers resilience, and MYRG balances growth with utility MSAs (master service agreements). Valuation sensitivity is elevated across all, trading at premiums to historical norms on sector tailwinds.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors STRL for its superior trend consistency, explosive backlog expansion in data centers, and relative outperformance (160%+ YTD), positioning it strongly amid infrastructure acceleration. MYRG follows closely with record metrics and margin leverage, while PWR provides stability but lags short-term momentum. This probabilistic edge reflects observable catalysts like earnings beats and sector rotation, though rotation risks persist.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MYRG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and STRL’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- MYRG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- STRL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MYRG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and STRL’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MYRG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- STRL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MYRG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.47% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +3.17% , and STRL (@Engineering & Construction) price fluctuated +63.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
MYRG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
STRL is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-1.45% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| MYRG | PWR | STRL | |
| Capitalization | 7.14B | 117B | 26.6B |
| EBITDA | 266M | 2.71B | 590M |
| Gain YTD | 109.803 | 85.219 | 183.506 |
| P/E Ratio | 50.54 | 107.19 | 77.59 |
| Revenue | 3.83B | 30.1B | 2.89B |
| Total Cash | 163M | 365M | 512M |
| Total Debt | 61.5M | 6.32B | 342M |
MYRG | PWR | STRL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 21 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 3 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 60 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 6 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 9 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MYRG's Valuation (84) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (92) and is in the same range as STRL (93). This means that MYRG's stock grew similarly to PWR’s and similarly to STRL’s over the last 12 months.
STRL's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (3) and is in the same range as MYRG (5). This means that STRL's stock grew similarly to PWR’s and similarly to MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
STRL's SMR Rating (27) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MYRG (42) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (60). This means that STRL's stock grew similarly to MYRG’s and somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as STRL (34) and is in the same range as MYRG (35). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to STRL’s and similarly to MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
STRL's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (9) and is significantly better than the same rating for MYRG (83). This means that STRL's stock grew similarly to PWR’s and significantly faster than MYRG’s over the last 12 months.
| MYRG | PWR | STRL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 7 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 59% | 14 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
MYRG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MYRG has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MYRG jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MYRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYRG | 100% | +4.70% | ||
| PWR - MYRG | 80% Closely correlated | +4.88% | ||
| MTZ - MYRG | 75% Closely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| EME - MYRG | 68% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| STRL - MYRG | 68% Closely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| FIX - MYRG | 66% Loosely correlated | +4.13% | ||
More | ||||
PWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | 100% | +4.88% | ||
| MTZ - PWR | 79% Closely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| MYRG - PWR | 79% Closely correlated | +4.70% | ||
| FIX - PWR | 76% Closely correlated | +4.13% | ||
| IESC - PWR | 67% Closely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| EME - PWR | 66% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||
STRL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STRL has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STRL jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STRL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRL | 100% | +2.77% | ||
| FIX - STRL | 78% Closely correlated | +4.13% | ||
| PWR - STRL | 76% Closely correlated | +4.88% | ||
| IESC - STRL | 73% Closely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| MTZ - STRL | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| ECG - STRL | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||