NTAP
Price
$104.53
Change
+$0.85 (+0.82%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
20.63B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STX
Price
$547.75
Change
+$15.94 (+3.00%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
122.71B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WDC
Price
$372.52
Change
+$10.83 (+2.99%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
126.3B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NTAP or STX or WDC

Header iconNTAP vs STX vs WDC Comparison
Open Charts NTAP vs STX vs WDCBanner chart's image
NTAP vs STX vs WDC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? NetApp (NTAP) vs. Seagate Technology Holdings (STX) vs. Western Digital (WDC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • NTAP delivered Q3 FY2026 revenue of $1.71B (up 4% YoY) and record non-GAAP EPS of $2.12, driven by AI storage and all-flash array growth, though shares have underperformed YTD amid margin pressures.
  • STX reported Q2 FY2026 revenue of $2.83B (up 22% YoY) with non-GAAP EPS of $3.11, fueled by HAMR technology and nearline capacity fully allocated through 2026, supporting strong momentum.
  • WDC posted Q2 FY2026 revenue of $3.02B (up 25% YoY) and non-GAAP EPS of $2.13, with 2026 HDD production sold out to AI hyperscalers (89% of cloud revenue), highlighting peak demand visibility.
  • HDD peers STX and WDC show explosive YTD gains (33-42%) and multi-year contracts versus NTAP's stability (down ~4-7% YTD), amid AI data center storage surge.
  • All three benefit from AI-driven storage needs, but STX and WDC lead in high-capacity HDD momentum while NTAP excels in hybrid cloud software.

Introduction

NetApp (NTAP), Seagate Technology Holdings (STX), and Western Digital (WDC) operate in the data storage sector, where surging AI infrastructure demands massive capacity solutions. This stock comparison evaluates their recent performance, business models, and market positioning amid cloud and hyperscale growth. Traders eyeing momentum in AI-related plays and long-term investors assessing storage oligopoly dynamics will benefit from insights into relative valuation, catalysts, and sector tailwinds driving relative performance and stock comparison value.

NTAP Overview and Recent Performance

NetApp (NTAP) provides hybrid cloud data management software, all-flash arrays, and public cloud services, enabling unified storage across on-premises and cloud environments. In recent market activity, shares traded around $101, reflecting stability with a market cap near $20B and forward P/E of ~14-16. Q3 FY2026 results showed revenue of $1.71B (up 4% YoY, 6% ex-Spot divestiture) and record non-GAAP EPS of $2.12, beating estimates amid all-flash array sales hitting $1B (up 9%) and AI traction. Sentiment has been tempered by rising memory costs pressuring margins, though raised FY2026 guidance ($6.77-6.92B revenue) and strong cash flow ($317M) underscore resilience in enterprise and cloud segments.

STX Overview and Recent Performance

Seagate Technology Holdings (STX) specializes in hard disk drives (HDDs) and solid-state solutions for mass-capacity storage, targeting data centers and cloud providers. Recent trading saw shares near $353, with a ~$79-93B market cap and elevated P/E reflecting growth. Q2 FY2026 delivered $2.83B revenue (up 22% YoY), non-GAAP EPS of $3.11, and record margins (42.2% gross), driven by 190 exabytes shipped and HAMR-based Mozaic 4+ platform advancements (1.5M+ units). Nearline capacity is fully allocated through 2026, boosting sentiment via AI hyperscaler demand, with Q3 guidance at $2.9B revenue signaling sustained momentum.

WDC Overview and Recent Performance

Western Digital (WDC) manufactures HDDs and flash storage, focusing on high-capacity drives for AI data centers post-SanDisk restructuring. Shares recently at ~$245, with ~$83-88B market cap and P/E ~23-25. Q2 FY2026 revenue reached $3.02B (up 25% YoY), non-GAAP EPS $2.13, and gross margins at 46.1%, propelled by 215 exabytes shipped (up 22%) and cloud platform comprising 89% of revenue. Production capacity sold out through 2026 via multi-year hyperscaler deals extending to 2028 has fueled positive sentiment, despite recent volatility.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds that analyze thousands of tickers, spotlighting those best suited to current market conditions like volatility and sector rotations. These bots deliver impressive stats: annualized returns up to +218%, win rates of 52-95%, and profit factors reaching 25+. Strategies span swing trading, hedging, and trend following across sectors including semiconductors (+102% on SOXL), infrastructure (+68%), and volatility plays. Users can filter by timeframe (5-60min), assets, and risk, enabling copy trading via signal, virtual, or brokerage agents. Explore these curated performers to enhance your strategy in dynamic markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

NTAP emphasizes software-defined hybrid cloud storage with stable growth (2-5% revenue), lower volatility (beta ~1.35), and attractive valuation (P/E ~16), contrasting STX and WDC's hardware-centric HDD focus yielding explosive momentum (YTD +33-42%, 1Y +280-450%) from AI exabyte demand. HDD duopoly peers share risks like cyclicality and NAND competition but benefit from sold-out capacity and pricing power (HDD prices +46-60%), with WDC edging in revenue growth (28% LTM) and diversification, STX in HAMR tech leadership. NTAP offers sector exposure with less sensitivity to hardware cycles, while peers trade at premiums reflecting multi-year catalysts versus broader valuation risks.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors WDC for its superior trend consistency, sold-out 2026 capacity providing demand visibility through 2028, and leading relative positioning in AI hyperscaler storage (89% cloud revenue, 25% YoY growth). Probabilistic edge over STX (strong HAMR ramp) and NTAP (stable but lower momentum) stems from catalysts like margin expansion and exabyte shipment records, though monitoring cycle peaks remains key.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2026
Stock price -- (NTAP: $104.53STX: $547.75WDC: $372.52)
Brand notoriety: NTAP, STX and WDC are all notable
STX and WDC are part of the Computer Processing Hardware industry, and NTAP is in the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTAP: 94%, STX: 97%, WDC: 71%
Market capitalization -- NTAP: $20.63B, STX: $122.71B, WDC: $126.3B
$STX [@Computer Processing Hardware] is valued at $122.71B. $WDC’s [@Computer Processing Hardware] market capitalization is $ $126.3B. $NTAP [@Computer Communications] has a market capitalization of $ $20.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry ranges from $ $206.79B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $ $3.14T to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry is $ $14.99B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $ $22.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTX’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s), and WDC’s FA Score reflects 4 green FA rating(s).

  • NTAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STX’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WDC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, STX and WDC are a better buy in the long-term than NTAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTAP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and WDC’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NTAP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • STX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WDC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NTAP is a better buy in the short-term than STX, which in turn is a better option than WDC.

Price Growth

NTAP (@Computer Communications) experienced а +8.96% price change this week, while STX (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +8.87% , and WDC (@Computer Processing Hardware) price fluctuated +8.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +22.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.82%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +10.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

NTAP is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2026.

STX is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

WDC is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+22.06% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Computer Processing Hardware (+10.33% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WDC($126B) and STX($123B) has a higher market cap than NTAP($20.6B). STX has higher P/E ratio than WDC and NTAP: STX (61.89) vs WDC (35.21) and NTAP (17.54). WDC YTD gains are higher at: 116.345 vs. STX (99.247) and NTAP (-1.412). WDC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.37B vs. STX (2.74B) and NTAP (1.79B). NTAP has less debt than WDC and STX: NTAP (2.73B) vs WDC (4.66B) and STX (4.8B). WDC has higher revenues than STX and NTAP: WDC (10.7B) vs STX (10.1B) and NTAP (6.71B).
NTAPSTXWDC
Capitalization20.6B123B126B
EBITDA1.79B2.74B4.37B
Gain YTD-1.41299.247116.345
P/E Ratio17.5461.8935.21
Revenue6.71B10.1B10.7B
Total Cash3.01BN/A4.04B
Total Debt2.73B4.8B4.66B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NTAP vs STX vs WDC: Fundamental Ratings
NTAP
STX
WDC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
204230
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5833
SMR RATING
1..100
12424
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5311
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4745
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
327590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NTAP's Valuation (13) in the Computer Peripherals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WDC (69) and is significantly better than the same rating for STX (95). This means that NTAP's stock grew somewhat faster than WDC’s and significantly faster than STX’s over the last 12 months.

WDC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as STX (3) and is somewhat better than the same rating for NTAP (58). This means that WDC's stock grew similarly to STX’s and somewhat faster than NTAP’s over the last 12 months.

STX's SMR Rating (4) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as NTAP (12) and is in the same range as WDC (24). This means that STX's stock grew similarly to NTAP’s and similarly to WDC’s over the last 12 months.

STX's Price Growth Rating (1) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as WDC (1) and is somewhat better than the same rating for NTAP (53). This means that STX's stock grew similarly to WDC’s and somewhat faster than NTAP’s over the last 12 months.

STX's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as WDC (5) and is somewhat better than the same rating for NTAP (47). This means that STX's stock grew similarly to WDC’s and somewhat faster than NTAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTAPSTXWDC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WDC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLCA52.380.54
+1.04%
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
EWJ90.190.78
+0.87%
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
YLDE55.850.42
+0.75%
Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Inc ETF
QTAP49.190.27
+0.56%
Innovator Growth-100 Acltd Ps ETF™ April
BRHY51.160.17
+0.33%
iShares High Yield Active ETF