In the competitive semiconductor sector, NVTS, QCOM, and TXN represent diverse strategies amid rising demand for AI, automotive, and power efficiency. Navitas focuses on next-gen GaN and SiC for high-power applications, Qualcomm leverages wireless connectivity for mobiles and vehicles, and Texas Instruments dominates analog chips for industrial use. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business shifts, and relative positioning, aiding traders seeking growth momentum and investors prioritizing stability in a cyclical market.
Navitas Semiconductor Corporation designs and markets gallium nitride (GaN) power ICs and silicon carbide (SiC) devices for power conversion in AI data centers, EVs, and renewables. In recent market activity, NVTS shares surged post-Q4 earnings, beating revenue estimates at $7.3M despite a YoY decline, signaling a bottom. The company accelerated its "Navitas 2.0" pivot to high-power markets like AI data centers, which comprised most Q4 revenue, with new 650V GaN sampling and design wins over $450M. YTD gains near 15% reflect optimism in GaN/SiC efficiency for power-hungry AI, though volatility persists from ongoing losses and a small $1.9B market cap.
QUALCOMM Incorporated develops wireless technologies, including Snapdragon platforms for mobiles, automotive, and edge AI. Recent weeks saw QCOM post record Q1 FY2026 revenues of $12.25B, driven by automotive up 15% to $1.1B via Snapdragon Digital Chassis and handsets up 3%. IoT grew 9%, but Q2 guidance tempered by memory shortages disappointed, pressuring shares amid YTD declines. With a $145B market cap and P/E around 27, sentiment hinges on diversification beyond handsets into automotive ADAS and on-device AI, offsetting cyclical wireless risks.
Texas Instruments Incorporated leads in analog and embedded semiconductors for industrial, automotive, and consumer applications. In recent activity, TXN reported Q4 2025 revenue up 10% YoY to $4.42B, with Q1 guidance solid, alongside a $7.5B Silicon Labs acquisition adding wireless IoT. A new Nvidia partnership accelerates humanoid robotics via sensor fusion and real-time control. Shares faced pressure from sector headwinds, but a $176B market cap and P/E near 35 underscore resilient cash flows and dividends, bolstered by analog demand in electrification.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from hundreds available on the platform, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend following, swing trading, and hedging, spanning timeframes from 5-minute to 60-minute intervals with technical and fundamental analyses. Highlighted trending bots boast impressive stats: annualized returns up to +218%, win rates of 52-95%, and profit factors reaching 25. For instance, the Minerals, Electric, Comm Tech, Semi, Oil, Aerospace bot (15min, 25 tickers) shows +135% annualized return and 62% win rate, while AeroDefense ITA (60min) delivers +32% return with 80% win rate. Ideal for current volatility, these bots adapt to market conditions. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify suitable options for your portfolio.
NVTS, QCOM, and TXN share semiconductor exposure but diverge in models: Navitas targets niche high-growth GaN/SiC power for AI and EVs, offering explosive upside but high risk from losses and competition; Qualcomm blends licensing with chips for wireless ecosystems, balancing handset cyclicality via automotive (35% Q2 growth forecast) and AI PCs; Texas Instruments excels in mature analog/embedded, with broad industrial diversification and steady returns. Growth drivers contrast: NVTS rides AI power efficiency, QCOM connectivity, TXN robotics/acquisitions. Recent momentum favors NVTS (YTD +15%), while larger peers lag on valuation sensitivity (TXN highest P/E) and sector sentiment shifts. Risks include NVTS' volatility, QCOM's supply chains, TXN's capex.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward NVTS for its trend consistency in AI data center catalysts, superior YTD relative performance, and positioning in high-power semiconductors amid sector rotations. While QCOM and TXN provide stability via scale and diversification, Navitas' momentum and growth trajectory suggest higher probabilistic outperformance in the near term, though with elevated volatility.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NVTS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQCOM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and TXN’s FA Score reflects 4 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NVTS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QCOM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and TXN’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
NVTS (@Semiconductors) experienced а +29.14% price change this week, while QCOM (@Semiconductors) price change was +6.36% , and TXN (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +7.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +11.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.53%.
NVTS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2026.
QCOM is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.
TXN is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2026.
The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| NVTS | QCOM | TXN | |
| Capitalization | 2.84B | 145B | 209B |
| EBITDA | -67.33M | 14.8B | 8.25B |
| Gain YTD | 72.549 | -19.863 | 33.333 |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 27.46 | 42.17 |
| Revenue | 45.9M | 44.9B | 17.7B |
| Total Cash | 237M | 11.8B | 4.88B |
| Total Debt | 6.47M | 14.8B | 14B |
QCOM | TXN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 8 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QCOM's Valuation (9) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as TXN (14) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew similarly to TXN’s over the last 12 months.
TXN's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (87) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that TXN’s stock grew somewhat faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
TXN's SMR Rating (32) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as QCOM (43) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that TXN’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
TXN's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (61) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that TXN’s stock grew somewhat faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.
QCOM's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as TXN (25) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew similarly to TXN’s over the last 12 months.
| NVTS | QCOM | TXN | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 86% | 13 days ago 73% | 21 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 45% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SOXX | 415.71 | 9.76 | +2.40% |
| iShares Semiconductor ETF | |||
| GRX | 9.28 | 0.08 | +0.87% |
| Gabelli Healthcare & Wellness Trust (The) | |||
| DDTO | 22.28 | 0.10 | +0.47% |
| Innovator Eq Dual Drctnl 10 Buf ETF Oct | |||
| ISHG | 76.12 | 0.19 | +0.25% |
| iShares 1-3 Year International TrsBd ETF | |||
| XHYT | 34.11 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| BondBloxx US HY Telecm Md Tech Sctr ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVTS has been loosely correlated with IFNNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NVTS jumps, then IFNNY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NVTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVTS | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| IFNNY - NVTS | 45% Loosely correlated | +5.79% | ||
| TOELY - NVTS | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| PENG - NVTS | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| AAOI - NVTS | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| COHU - NVTS | 41% Loosely correlated | +4.80% | ||
More | ||||