NVTS
Price
$13.20
Change
+$0.87 (+7.06%)
Updated
Apr 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.05B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RMBS
Price
$126.93
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.72B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSEM
Price
$224.45
Change
-$2.00 (-0.88%)
Updated
Apr 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.26B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NVTS or RMBS or TSEM

Header iconNVTS vs RMBS vs TSEM Comparison
Open Charts NVTS vs RMBS vs TSEMBanner chart's image
NVTS vs RMBS vs TSEM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS) vs. Rambus Inc. (RMBS) vs. Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (TSEM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • NVTS shows high volatility with a beta of 3.21 and YTD gains of about 15%, driven by its pivot to AI data centers and high-power GaN/SiC tech, but remains unprofitable.
  • RMBS trades at a P/E of around 47x with a market cap near $9.5B, facing recent share declines amid supply disruptions despite strong AI memory controller advancements.
  • TSEM leads with a $12.4B market cap and P/E of 57x, posting record Q4 revenue from silicon photonics and AI partnerships like NVIDIA, with 167% 1-year returns.
  • All three benefit from AI exposure—NVTS in power efficiency, RMBS in memory IP, TSEM in photonics—but TSEM exhibits superior scale and profitability.
  • Recent market activity reveals momentum shifts: NVTS volatile post-earnings, RMBS down 12% in recent weeks, TSEM resilient amid sector pullbacks.
  • Valuation sensitivity highest for NVTS at 37x P/S, contrasting TSEM's established earnings base.

Introduction

This comparison examines NVTS, RMBS, and TSEM, all semiconductor firms capitalizing on AI-driven demand for advanced power, memory, and photonics technologies. These stocks appeal to growth-oriented traders and investors tracking relative performance in the volatile chip sector, where recent developments in data centers and energy infrastructure have spurred momentum. By analyzing business models, recent market activity, and head-to-head metrics, this stock comparison highlights contrasts in valuation, risk, and positioning amid shifting sentiment.

NVTS Overview and Recent Performance

Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS) specializes in gallium nitride (GaN) and silicon carbide (SiC) power semiconductors for efficient power conversion in mobile, data centers, and EVs. Recent weeks have seen volatile price action, with shares surging over 20% post-Q4 earnings on February 24, 2026, reflecting a strategic "Navitas 2.0" pivot to high-power AI data centers and energy infrastructure—now over 50% of revenue. Key catalysts include partnerships with GlobalFoundries for U.S. GaN production and new 650V GaN/3300V SiC sampling, alongside CFO transition. High beta (3.21) amplifies swings, with YTD gains near 15% but premium 37x P/S valuation signaling growth expectations amid ongoing losses.

RMBS Overview and Recent Performance

Rambus Inc. (RMBS) develops high-speed memory interface and security IP, targeting DDR5 and AI data centers. Recent market activity pressured shares down about 12% over the past month, including a post-earnings drop despite Q4 revenue beats and strong margins over 45%. Sentiment reflects supply chain disruptions impacting Q1 guidance and contract revenue shortfalls, offsetting HBM4E memory controller launches for AI performance. With a market cap around $9.5B, beta of 1.59, and P/E near 47x, RMBS balances profitability (EPS $2.11 TTM) against valuation concerns in recent weeks.

TSEM Overview and Recent Performance

Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (TSEM), an independent foundry, delivers specialty processes like SiPho, RF CMOS, and power management for AI, automotive, and industrial uses. Shares exhibited resilience in recent market activity, with record Q4 2025 revenue of $440M (up 14% YoY) fueled by RF infrastructure and photonics demand. Partnerships with NVIDIA for 1.6T optical modules, Salience Labs for AI switches, and Xanadu/Scintil in quantum/AI lasers boosted sentiment. Trading at a $12.4B market cap, P/E 57x, and beta 0.94, TSEM shows strong 1-year returns over 167%, underpinned by earnings growth and capacity expansions.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases top-performing AI trading bots curated from a broader suite of over 25+ bots optimized for current market conditions across growth sectors like semiconductors, energy, and AI infrastructure. These bots employ diverse strategies—trend following, dip buying, hedging—on timeframes from 5min to 60min, trading 1-25+ tickers with stats like annualized returns up to +215%, win rates to 95%, and profit factors over 25x. AI analyzes all bots to spotlight those excelling in volatility, offering copy trading signals with risk management. Explore these high-conviction options tailored to dynamic markets at Trending AI Robots.

Head-to-Head Comparison

NVTS, RMBS, and TSEM operate in semiconductors but diverge in models: NVTS focuses on power ICs (GaN/SiC), RMBS on memory/security IP, TSEM as a specialty foundry. Growth drivers center on AI—NVTS/energy efficiency, RMBS/HBM controllers, TSEM/photonics—but TSEM scales via partnerships. Recent momentum favors TSEM (YTD 8%, 1-yr 167%) over RMBS (-12% monthly) and volatile NVTS. Risks include NVTS' losses/high beta (3.21), RMBS supply issues, TSEM capex. TSEM's profitability contrasts NVTS' premium P/S (37x vs. industry 6x), with all sensitive to AI sentiment.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors TSEM due to its trend consistency, record revenues, diversified AI catalysts like NVIDIA photonics, and relative stability (beta 0.94) versus peers' volatility and disruptions. While NVTS offers high-upside potential from GaN scaling and RMBS profitability, TSEM's positioning suggests stronger probabilistic outperformance in the near term amid semiconductor momentum.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (NVTS: $12.32RMBS: $126.93TSEM: $226.45)
Brand notoriety: NVTS, RMBS and TSEM are all not notable
The three companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NVTS: 202%, RMBS: 131%, TSEM: 79%
Market capitalization -- NVTS: $2.84B, RMBS: $13.73B, TSEM: $24.6B
$NVTS is valued at $2.84B, while RMBS has a market capitalization of $13.73B, and TSEM's market capitalization is $24.6B. The market cap for tickers in this @Semiconductors ranges from $4.9T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Semiconductors industry is $122.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NVTS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and TSEM’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NVTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TSEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMBS is a better buy in the long-term than TSEM, which in turn is a better option than NVTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NVTS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and TSEM’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NVTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TSEM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NVTS and TSEM are a better buy in the short-term than RMBS.

Price Growth

NVTS (@Semiconductors) experienced а +29.14% price change this week, while RMBS (@Semiconductors) price change was +14.93% , and TSEM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +11.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +10.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

NVTS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2026.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2026.

TSEM is expected to report earnings on May 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+10.10% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSEM($25.3B) has a higher market cap than RMBS($13.7B) and NVTS($3.05B). TSEM YTD gains are higher at: 91.186 vs. NVTS (84.874) and RMBS (38.067). TSEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 507M vs. RMBS (325M) and NVTS (-67.33M). TSEM has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. RMBS (762M) and NVTS (237M). NVTS has less debt than RMBS and TSEM: NVTS (6.47M) vs RMBS (25M) and TSEM (164M). TSEM has higher revenues than RMBS and NVTS: TSEM (1.51B) vs RMBS (708M) and NVTS (45.9M).
NVTSRMBSTSEM
Capitalization3.05B13.7B25.3B
EBITDA-67.33M325M507M
Gain YTD84.87438.06791.186
P/E RatioN/A60.13115.72
Revenue45.9M708M1.51B
Total Cash237M762M1.22B
Total Debt6.47M25M164M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMBS vs TSEM: Fundamental Ratings
RMBS
TSEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
203
SMR RATING
1..100
4679
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3734
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
113
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMBS's Valuation (79) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TSEM (88). This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to TSEM’s over the last 12 months.

TSEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as RMBS (20). This means that TSEM’s stock grew similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's SMR Rating (46) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TSEM (79). This means that RMBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TSEM’s over the last 12 months.

TSEM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as RMBS (37). This means that TSEM’s stock grew similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

TSEM's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as RMBS (11). This means that TSEM’s stock grew similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NVTSRMBSTSEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NVTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RMBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STXK36.590.24
+0.67%
Strive Small-Cap ETF
HYMB25.200.01
+0.04%
Stt Strt® SPDR® Nuveen ICE HY Muncpl ETF
MYMI24.68N/A
-0.02%
State Street® My2029 Municipal Bond ETF
USDU25.85-0.02
-0.08%
WisdomTree Bloomberg US Dllr Bullish ETF
ACEI24.74-0.05
-0.20%
Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF

NVTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVTS has been loosely correlated with IFNNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NVTS jumps, then IFNNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NVTS
1D Price
Change %
NVTS100%
+7.14%
IFNNY - NVTS
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
TOELY - NVTS
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
PENG - NVTS
43%
Loosely correlated
+5.09%
AAOI - NVTS
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
COHU - NVTS
41%
Loosely correlated
+7.30%
More

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
-0.05%
LRCX - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
AMKR - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+3.07%
KLIC - RMBS
76%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
VECO - RMBS
75%
Closely correlated
+8.75%
KLAC - RMBS
74%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
More

TSEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSEM has been loosely correlated with MTSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TSEM jumps, then MTSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSEM
1D Price
Change %
TSEM100%
-0.87%
MTSI - TSEM
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
AMKR - TSEM
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.07%
AMBA - TSEM
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
KLIC - TSEM
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
KLAC - TSEM
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
More