NXPI
Price
$225.40
Change
+$4.06 (+1.83%)
Updated
Apr 21, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
55.93B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RMBS
Price
$131.28
Change
+$4.40 (+3.47%)
Updated
Apr 21, 11:20 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.72B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TEL
Price
$252.24
Change
+$4.58 (+1.85%)
Updated
Apr 21, 11:22 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
72.67B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NXPI or RMBS or TEL

Header iconNXPI vs RMBS vs TEL Comparison
Open Charts NXPI vs RMBS vs TELBanner chart's image
NXPI vs RMBS vs TEL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) vs. Rambus (RMBS) vs. TE Connectivity (TEL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • NXPI shares have declined about 20% in recent weeks amid broader semiconductor pressures but maintain strong automotive exposure with analyst targets around $262.
  • RMBS delivered robust 77% one-year gains driven by AI memory IP, though recent volatility follows CFO transition and valuation scrutiny; targets near $119.
  • TEL exhibits relative stability with 40% annual returns, bolstered by AI data center demand and recent dividend hike; highest market cap at $59B and targets at $275.
  • All three benefit from tech sector tailwinds, but TEL shows superior YTD performance (11%) versus NXPI (11%) and RMBS (5%).
  • Semiconductor peers face cyclical risks, while TEL's diversified connectivity solutions offer lower volatility.
  • Recent AI-related developments position RMBS for high growth, but TEL leads in stability and capital returns.

Introduction

This stock comparison evaluates NXPI, RMBS, and TEL amid evolving semiconductor and connectivity markets. These companies operate in overlapping tech ecosystems, with exposure to automotive, data centers, AI infrastructure, and industrial applications. Traders seeking momentum in volatile semis or investors prioritizing stability in diversified electronics will find value in assessing their relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning. Recent sector shifts, including AI demand surges and supply chain dynamics, underscore key contrasts in resilience and upside potential.

NXPI Overview and Recent Performance

NXP Semiconductors N.V., headquartered in Eindhoven, Netherlands, specializes in high-performance mixed-signal semiconductors for automotive, industrial IoT, mobile, and communication infrastructure. Its portfolio includes microcontrollers, wireless connectivity solutions, and sensors critical for secure embedded applications.

In recent market activity, NXPI shares have faced headwinds, declining approximately 20% over four weeks to around $193, entering oversold territory per technical indicators. This pullback follows mixed Q4 results with earnings beats offset by softer guidance, amid broader chip sector pressures. Positive catalysts include a quarterly dividend announcement of $1.014 per share and innovations like the i.MX 93W processor for edge AI and physical AI applications. Analysts maintain a moderate buy consensus with a $262 average target, citing rebound potential from automotive strength and improving industrial trends.

RMBS Overview and Recent Performance

Rambus Inc., based in San Jose, California, designs semiconductor IP and chips focused on high-speed memory interfaces, security solutions, and data protection for AI, data centers, and automotive uses. Key offerings include DDR5 memory controllers and HBM IP.

RMBS has shown strong longer-term momentum with 77% one-year returns, trading near $97 within a 52-week range of $40-$136. Recent weeks brought volatility, including a CFO departure and scrutiny over valuation after record 2025 revenue. However, advancements like the HBM4E Controller IP for AI workloads have bolstered sentiment. Q4 results featured $190M revenue and 41% full-year product growth. Analysts rate it a buy with $119 targets, highlighting AI memory tailwinds despite near-term uncertainties.

TEL Overview and Recent Performance

TE Connectivity plc, an Ireland-based industrial technology firm, produces connectivity and sensor solutions for transportation, industrial, and communications sectors, serving AI data centers, EVs, and energy markets.

Shares of TEL trade around $202, up 40% over the past year in a $116-$251 range, reflecting resilience. Recent activity includes a 10% quarterly dividend increase to $0.78 and $3B share repurchase expansion, signaling confidence. Q1 FY2026 sales rose 22% to $4.7B, driven by AI data center connectivity despite supply challenges. The stock has held steady amid sector rotations. With a strong buy consensus and $275 targets, TEL benefits from diversified exposure and sustainability milestones.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots out of 351 total, selected by AI analysis for superior performance in current market conditions. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, hedging, and volatility plays across sectors including semiconductors (e.g., SOXL, MPWR), aerospace, energy, and AI-driven ETFs. Impressive stats include annualized returns up to +208%, win rates as high as 95%, and profit factors exceeding 25 in some cases, often outperforming the S&P 500. Users can follow signal agents for real-time trades, virtual agents for simulated portfolios, or brokerage agents for automated execution, with filters for volatility and analysis types. Explore these curated bots to leverage AI for stock comparison and trading edges in dynamic environments like semis and connectivity.

Head-to-Head Comparison

NXPI, RMBS, and TEL share tech exposure but diverge in focus: NXPI emphasizes automotive semis (significant market share post-Freescale acquisition), RMBS targets high-growth AI memory IP, and TEL provides broad connectivity for data centers and industrials.

Growth drivers contrast sharply: RMBS boasts 41% product revenue surge from DDR5/HBM adoption, versus TEL's 22% sales lift and NXPI's steadier automotive/IoT mix. Recent momentum favors TEL (YTD +11%, stable), over RMBS (+5%, volatile) and NXPI (+11%, recent dip).

Risk profiles differ: Cyclical semis expose NXPI and RMBS to inventory swings, while TEL's diversification mitigates this. Valuation sensitivity is high for growth-oriented RMBS (trailing P/E ~45), versus more mature peers. Market sentiment tilts positive on AI catalysts across all, but TEL leads in capital returns and scale ($59B cap vs. $49B NXPI, $10B RMBS).

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors TEL for its trend consistency, lower relative volatility, and strong positioning in AI data center connectivity alongside robust capital allocation. While RMBS offers high-upside AI memory catalysts and NXPI rebound potential, TEL's diversified stability and superior recent metrics suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (NXPI: $221.34RMBS: $126.87TEL: $247.66)
Brand notoriety: RMBS and TEL are not notable and NXPI is notable
NXPI and RMBS are part of the Semiconductors industry, and TEL is in the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NXPI: 97%, RMBS: 74%, TEL: 129%
Market capitalization -- NXPI: $55.93B, RMBS: $13.72B, TEL: $72.67B
$NXPI [@Semiconductors] is valued at $55.93B. $RMBS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $ $13.72B. $TEL [@Electronic Components] has a market capitalization of $ $72.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $ $4.91T to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $ $187.87B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $ $122.82B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $ $11.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NXPI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and TEL’s FA Score reflects 4 green FA rating(s).

  • NXPI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TEL’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, TEL is a better buy in the long-term than NXPI and RMBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NXPI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and TEL’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NXPI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RMBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TEL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TEL is a better buy in the short-term than RMBS, which in turn is a better option than NXPI.

Price Growth

NXPI (@Semiconductors) experienced а +6.41% price change this week, while RMBS (@Semiconductors) price change was +12.12% , and TEL (@Electronic Components) price fluctuated +5.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +10.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.22%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +3.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

NXPI is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

RMBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2026.

TEL is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+10.22% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

@Electronic Components (+3.95% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEL($72.7B) has a higher market cap than NXPI($55.9B) and RMBS($13.7B). RMBS has higher P/E ratio than TEL and NXPI: RMBS (60.13) vs TEL (35.69) and NXPI (27.84). RMBS YTD gains are higher at: 38.067 vs. TEL (9.190) and NXPI (2.501). TEL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.47B vs. NXPI (3.96B) and RMBS (325M). NXPI has more cash in the bank: 2.91B vs. TEL (1.25B) and RMBS (762M). RMBS has less debt than TEL and NXPI: RMBS (25M) vs TEL (5.71B) and NXPI (12.2B). TEL has higher revenues than NXPI and RMBS: TEL (18.1B) vs NXPI (12.3B) and RMBS (708M).
NXPIRMBSTEL
Capitalization55.9B13.7B72.7B
EBITDA3.96B325M4.47B
Gain YTD2.50138.0679.190
P/E Ratio27.8460.1335.69
Revenue12.3B708M18.1B
Total Cash2.91B762M1.25B
Total Debt12.2B25M5.71B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NXPI vs RMBS vs TEL: Fundamental Ratings
NXPI
RMBS
TEL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
141928
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
772017
SMR RATING
1..100
434651
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
503710
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
231116
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
755050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NXPI's Valuation (12) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TEL (20) in the Electronic Components industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for RMBS (79) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that NXPI's stock grew similarly to TEL’s and significantly faster than RMBS’s over the last 12 months.

TEL's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as RMBS (20) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for NXPI (77) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TEL's stock grew similarly to RMBS’s and somewhat faster than NXPI’s over the last 12 months.

NXPI's SMR Rating (43) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as RMBS (46) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as TEL (51) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that NXPI's stock grew similarly to RMBS’s and similarly to TEL’s over the last 12 months.

TEL's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as RMBS (37) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for NXPI (50) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that TEL's stock grew similarly to RMBS’s and somewhat faster than NXPI’s over the last 12 months.

RMBS's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as TEL (16) in the Electronic Components industry, and is in the same range as NXPI (23) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that RMBS's stock grew similarly to TEL’s and similarly to NXPI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NXPIRMBSTEL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NXPI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RMBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TEL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDVY42.370.14
+0.33%
First Trust SMID Cp Rising Div Achv ETF
DMO11.210.02
+0.18%
Western Asset Mortgage Opportunity Fund
XHYH35.52-0.02
-0.06%
BondBloxx US High Yield Hlthcr Sctr ETF
HUMN32.66-0.38
-1.15%
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF
ETJ8.38-0.11
-1.30%
Eaton Vance Risk - Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund

NXPI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NXPI has been closely correlated with MCHPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NXPI jumps, then MCHPP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NXPI
1D Price
Change %
NXPI100%
+2.46%
MCHPP - NXPI
82%
Closely correlated
+1.76%
ON - NXPI
79%
Closely correlated
+3.07%
ENTG - NXPI
78%
Closely correlated
+1.96%
MCHP - NXPI
78%
Closely correlated
+2.07%
LRCX - NXPI
77%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
More

RMBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMBS
1D Price
Change %
RMBS100%
-0.05%
LRCX - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
AMKR - RMBS
77%
Closely correlated
+3.07%
KLIC - RMBS
76%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
VECO - RMBS
75%
Closely correlated
+8.75%
KLAC - RMBS
74%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
More

TEL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEL has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEL jumps, then APH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TEL
1D Price
Change %
TEL100%
+0.62%
APH - TEL
66%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
FLEX - TEL
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
KN - TEL
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.49%
JBL - TEL
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
FN - TEL
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
More