This stock comparison examines three prominent master limited partnerships (MLPs) in the oil and gas midstream sector: PAA, PAGP, and WES. These companies provide essential infrastructure for transporting crude oil, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and natural gas, making them relevant for income-focused investors seeking high yields and relative stability amid energy market fluctuations. Traders interested in relative performance, dividend sustainability, and sector positioning will find value in understanding their business models, recent momentum, and key differentiators in the current environment.
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) is a leading midstream provider engaged in the transportation, terminalling, storage, and gathering of crude oil and NGLs across the United States and Canada. Operating through Crude Oil and NGL segments, it handles vast volumes via pipelines, trucks, and rail. In recent market activity, PAA shares experienced a modest pullback from highs near $23, trading around $22.37, yet boasting a robust year-to-date gain of 29.58%. Sentiment has been influenced by ongoing regulatory review of its Canadian NGL assets sale, positioning the company as a purer crude oil play, alongside solid Q4 2025 adjusted EBITDA of $738 million. Stable dividends and Permian Basin exposure have supported resilience.
Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP), the general partner of PAA, oversees midstream infrastructure for crude oil and NGLs, mirroring its subsidiary's operations in gathering, transportation, and storage. Shares recently traded near $23.82 after a slight decline, with year-to-date performance at 29.21%, closely tracking PAA. Key drivers include alignment with PAA's strategic divestitures, such as the NGL business update, and quarterly distribution announcements. Analyst adjustments, including raised price targets, reflect optimism around long-term growth prospects despite short-term sector pressures from commodity price swings.
Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) focuses on natural gas gathering, processing, and transportation, primarily in Texas, New Mexico, and the Rockies, with additional crude and produced water services. Backed by Occidental Petroleum, it operates fee-based assets for stability. In recent weeks, shares hovered around $42.16 following minor volatility, with year-to-date returns of 11.51%—trailing peers but supported by a high 8.82% yield. Performance reflects steady contract renegotiations and growth initiatives, including 2027 projects, amid positive midstream payout trends.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the top 25 AI trading bots out of 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. These bots are chosen for their suitability to current market conditions, showcasing impressive stats like annualized returns from +23.53% to +163.10%, win rates of 51.30% to 88.33%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Energy-related bots, such as those trading oil, semiconductors, and energy tickers, report annualized returns up to +93.26% with win rates around 61% and low drawdowns. Whether short-term scalpers or longer-hold strategies, these bots provide real-time signals for copy trading. Investors can explore this page to identify bots aligned with midstream energy trends like PAA, PAGP, and WES.
PAA and PAGP emphasize crude oil logistics with broad U.S./Canada exposure, contrasting WES's natural gas-centric model tied to Permian and Rockies volumes. Growth drivers for PAA/PAGP include NGL divestitures for crude purity, while WES leverages fee-based contracts (long-term take-or-pay agreements) and Occidental synergies. Recent momentum favors PAA and PAGP with superior YTD returns, though WES offers higher profitability margins (30%) and ROE (32%). Risks include commodity sensitivity for crude-focused pairs versus volume reliance for WES. Valuations show WES cheaper on P/E, but PAA edges in short-term buy signals. Market sentiment tilts toward transformation stories in crude midstream.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward PAA for its trend consistency, strategic refocus on crude oil, and stronger recent relative performance versus peers, positioning it favorably in short-term comparisons. While WES provides yield stability and PAGP tracks closely, PAA's momentum and catalysts suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term based on observable patterns.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PAA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePAGP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and WES’s FA Score reflects 4 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PAA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAGP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and WES’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
PAA (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +7.68% price change this week, while PAGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +7.99% , and WES (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price fluctuated +6.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.69%.
PAA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
PAGP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
WES is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| PAA | PAGP | WES | |
| Capitalization | 16.7B | 5.01B | 18.6B |
| EBITDA | 2.91B | 2.82B | 2.41B |
| Gain YTD | 36.874 | 37.422 | 25.189 |
| P/E Ratio | 21.28 | 32.48 | 15.57 |
| Revenue | 44.3B | 44.3B | 4.05B |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | 647M |
| Total Debt | 11.5B | 11.5B | 8.71B |
PAA | PAGP | WES | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 24 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 11 Undervalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 4 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 46 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 41 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 23 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WES's Valuation (4) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as PAA (10) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry, and is in the same range as PAGP (11) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that WES's stock grew similarly to PAA’s and similarly to PAGP’s over the last 12 months.
WES's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as PAGP (4) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry, and is in the same range as PAA (5) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that WES's stock grew similarly to PAGP’s and similarly to PAA’s over the last 12 months.
WES's SMR Rating (26) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as PAGP (46) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PAA (64) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that WES's stock grew similarly to PAGP’s and somewhat faster than PAA’s over the last 12 months.
PAGP's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAA (41) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry, and is in the same range as WES (42) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that PAGP's stock grew similarly to PAA’s and similarly to WES’s over the last 12 months.
WES's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as PAGP (23) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry, and is in the same range as PAA (31) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that WES's stock grew similarly to PAGP’s and similarly to PAA’s over the last 12 months.
| PAA | PAGP | WES | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 53% | 13 days ago 54% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 59% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGP has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGP jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAGP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAGP | 100% | +1.87% | ||
| PAA - PAGP | 96% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| OKE - PAGP | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| EPD - PAGP | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| TRGP - PAGP | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| CQP - PAGP | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WES has been loosely correlated with ET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WES jumps, then ET could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WES | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| ET - WES | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| OKE - WES | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| PAGP - WES | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| PAA - WES | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| TRGP - WES | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||