PG
Price
$144.48
Change
-$2.45 (-1.67%)
Updated
Apr 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
335.79B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PM
Price
$157.60
Change
-$0.19 (-0.12%)
Updated
Apr 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
245.55B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UL
Price
$57.97
Change
-$0.56 (-0.96%)
Updated
Apr 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
126.96B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PG or PM or UL

Header iconPG vs PM vs UL Comparison
Open Charts PG vs PM vs ULBanner chart's image
PG vs PM vs UL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Procter & Gamble (PG) vs. Philip Morris (PM) vs. Unilever (UL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • PG exhibits resilient year-to-date performance at around 8%, supported by its Dividend King status and analyst Buy ratings, despite recent market pressures.
  • PM shows strong longer-term momentum with over 11% one-year gains, driven by smoke-free product growth, though facing quarterly earnings volatility.
  • UL trades at a relatively attractive valuation with a forward P/E below 20, amid short-term share weakness but focus on AI partnerships and innovation.
  • All three stocks maintain robust dividend yields near 2.7-3.4%, appealing to income-focused investors in the consumer staples sector.
  • PM leads in market cap and smoke-free revenue transition, while PG and UL emphasize essential goods stability.
  • Recent weeks highlight defensive positioning amid volatility, with varying exposure to pricing power and emerging market growth.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines PG, PM, and UL, three consumer staples giants offering stability in volatile markets. PG dominates household essentials, PM pivots to smoke-free alternatives, and UL spans personal care and nutrition. Traders seeking relative performance insights and investors prioritizing dividends or growth in defensive sectors will find value here. Recent market activity underscores their resilience, with focus on pricing, innovation, and global demand driving sentiment shifts.

PG Overview and Recent Performance

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is a multinational leader in consumer goods, operating across five sectors: Baby, Feminine and Family Care; Beauty; Health Care; Grooming; and Fabric and Home Care. Its portfolio includes trusted brands driving steady demand. In recent market activity, PG shares have shown resilience, with year-to-date gains around 8% amid broader declines. Analyst support remains firm, with Citi maintaining a Buy rating and $181 target, bolstered by product revamps and a 70-year dividend increase history. Sentiment reflects steady organic sales growth in Beauty and Health Care, offsetting margin pressures from commodities and tariffs. Recent sessions saw sharper drops than the S&P 500, yet Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) signals balanced positioning.

PM Overview and Recent Performance

Philip Morris International (PM) focuses on nicotine products, transitioning from cigarettes to smoke-free alternatives like IQOS, now serving over 43 million users across 106 markets. This shift powers revenue, with smoke-free products nearing 42% of total. Recent performance includes 11% one-year returns and YTD gains around 6%, though weekly dips of nearly 10% followed earnings misses on adjusted income. A $1.47 quarterly dividend underscores shareholder commitment. Growth in Zyn and international markets drives momentum, with gross margins at 67% reflecting cost efficiency. Regulatory and competitive risks temper sentiment, yet outperformance versus Consumer Staples peers highlights transition strength.

UL Overview and Recent Performance

Unilever PLC (UL) operates five Business Groups: Beauty & Wellbeing, Personal Care, Home Care, Nutrition, and Ice Cream, reaching 3.4 billion daily users in 190 countries. Its model emphasizes innovation and sustainability. Shares have faced short-term weakness, with YTD returns near 3% and recent 1% declines outpacing some peers. Valuation appears compelling at a forward P/E under 20, supported by AI partnerships and a new CIO for digital focus. Underlying sales growth persists via premium brands, though competitive pressures weigh. Broader exposure to emerging markets (59% turnover) aids resilience amid volatility.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots excel in current market conditions, featuring win rates up to 94.92%, annualized returns reaching +215%, and profit factors as high as 25.83. Styles range from swing trading dips in industrials to trend-following in semiconductors, hedging volatility, and sector-specific signals like consumer staples—spanning 5-minute to 62-day timeframes. AI ranks them by low drawdowns and S&P outperformance, ideal for copy trading with risk management. Explore these high-conviction options to align with volatile environments.

Head-to-Head Comparison

PG, PM, and UL share consumer staples defensiveness but diverge in models: PG's focused superiority in essentials contrasts PM's high-growth smoke-free pivot (42% revenue) versus traditional tobacco decline, while UL balances broad categories with emerging market tilt. Momentum favors PM (11% 1Y) over PG's stability and UL's modest YTD. Risks include PG/ UL tariff/commodity pressures versus PM's regulation. Valuations show UL cheapest (P/E ~22), PG premium for consistency, PM growth-priced. Sentiment leans toward innovation catalysts over volume sensitivity.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors PM for its trend consistency in smoke-free growth, superior one-year momentum, and catalysts like IQOS expansion amid staples volatility. Probabilistic edge stems from relative positioning and margin gains, though PG offers stability and UL value. Observable factors suggest higher near-term upside potential for PM in dynamic conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (PG: $144.49PM: $157.55UL: $58.53)
Brand notoriety: PG and PM are notable and UL is not notable
PG and UL are part of the Household/Personal Care industry, and PM is in the Tobacco industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PG: 101%, PM: 96%, UL: 118%
Market capitalization -- PG: $335.79B, PM: $245.55B, UL: $126.98B
$PG [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $335.79B. $UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $ $126.98B. $PM [@Tobacco] has a market capitalization of $ $245.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $ $335.79B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tobacco] industry ranges from $ $245.55B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $ $19.99B. The average market capitalization across the [@Tobacco] industry is $ $32.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and UL’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PM is a better buy in the long-term than PG, which in turn is a better option than UL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and UL’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PM is a better buy in the short-term than PG, which in turn is a better option than UL.

Price Growth

PG (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +0.63% price change this week, while PM (@Tobacco) price change was -3.20% , and UL (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was -1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

PG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2026.

PM is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.15% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

@Tobacco (-1.34% weekly)

The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PG($336B) has a higher market cap than PM($246B) and UL($127B). PM and PG has higher P/E ratio than UL: PM (21.69) and PG (21.41) vs UL (19.01). PG YTD gains are higher at: 1.539 vs. PM (-0.900) and UL (-10.700). PG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.5B vs. PM (17.5B) and UL (11.3B). PG has less debt than PM and UL: PG (36.6B) vs PM (48.8B) and UL (). PG has higher revenues than UL and PM: PG (85.3B) vs UL (59.8B) and PM (40.6B).
PGPMUL
Capitalization336B246B127B
EBITDA24.5B17.5B11.3B
Gain YTD1.539-0.900-10.700
P/E Ratio21.4121.6919.01
Revenue85.3B40.6B59.8B
Total Cash10.8BN/AN/A
Total Debt36.6B48.8BN/A
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PG vs PM vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
PG
PM
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
505050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
23
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
541981
SMR RATING
1..100
30397
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
596079
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
818183
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PM's Valuation (23) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as PG (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is in the same range as UL (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PM's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

PM's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Tobacco industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PG (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for UL (81) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PM's stock grew somewhat faster than PG’s and somewhat faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

PM's SMR Rating (3) in the Tobacco industry is in the same range as PG (30) in the Household Or Personal Care industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for UL (97) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PM's stock grew similarly to PG’s and significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PM (60) in the Tobacco industry, and is in the same range as UL (79) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to PM’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

PG's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PM (81) in the Tobacco industry, and is in the same range as UL (83) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that PG's stock grew similarly to PM’s and similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PGPMUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBCE37.46N/A
N/A
Neuberger China Equity ETF
STBF25.40N/A
N/A
Performance Trust Short Term Bond ETF
USEP40.28-0.06
-0.15%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF-Sep
MTUM273.56-0.90
-0.33%
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
IQDG43.34-0.32
-0.73%
WisdomTree International Qual Div Gr ETF