SEMI
Price
$38.43
Change
+$1.65 (+4.49%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
35.93M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$609.45
Change
+$38.54 (+6.75%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
66.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XNTK
Price
$366.52
Change
+$16.91 (+4.84%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
2.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SEMI or SMH or XNTK

Header iconSEMI vs SMH vs XNTK Comparison
Open Charts SEMI vs SMH vs XNTKBanner chart's image
SEMI vs SMH vs XNTK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) vs. State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK)

Key Takeaways

  • SEMI offers active management with broader technology exposure beyond pure semiconductors, including top holdings like AAPL and MSFT, but at a higher 0.75% expense ratio.
  • SMH provides concentrated, passive exposure to 25-26 large U.S.-listed semiconductor firms via market-cap weighting, emphasizing liquidity and leaders like NVDA and TSM, with a competitive 0.35% expense ratio.
  • XNTK delivers equal-weighted diversification across 35 U.S.-listed technology stocks, reducing mega-cap dominance, with significant semiconductor allocation (~40%) and identical 0.35% expense ratio.
  • All three ETFs exhibit high concentration risk in semiconductors, but XNTK's equal-weighting and broader tech tilt offer better diversification; SMH suits pure-play liquidity seekers.
  • Cost efficiency favors SMH and XNTK over SEMI, while SEMI's active strategy allows flexibility in volatile markets.
  • In recent market cycles, mega-cap driven semis have boosted SMH, but equal-weight approaches like XNTK show resilience in drawdowns.

Introduction

SEMI, SMH, and XNTK provide targeted exposure to the surging semiconductor and technology sectors, fueled by AI demand, data centers, and chip innovation. SMH and SEMI focus intensely on semiconductors—SMH via a passive index of the most liquid U.S.-listed producers, SEMI through active selection—while XNTK takes an equal-weighted approach to broader NYSE-listed technology firms, including semis (~40% allocation). These ETFs represent varied strategies: concentrated passive (SMH), active thematic (SEMI), and diversified equal-weight tech (XNTK). Comparing them helps investors weigh pure semiconductor bets against broader tech diversification amid geopolitical tensions, supply chain shifts, and cyclical earnings in chips.

Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) Overview

The Columbia Select Technology ETF (SEMI) is an actively managed fund seeking capital appreciation through a concentrated portfolio of technology and semiconductor-related companies. It holds approximately 37 stocks, selected by portfolio managers for growth potential without tracking a specific index. Top holdings include NVDA (~16-18%), AVGO (~9-10%), AAPL (~8%), MSFT (~7%), and LRCX (~6-7%). Sector allocation emphasizes electronic technology (59%), technology services (21%), and producer manufacturing (10%). The expense ratio is 0.75%, reflecting active management costs. Launched in March 2022, SEMI offers flexibility to navigate sector rotations but carries higher fees and manager risk.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is a passive ETF tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, focusing on the 25 most liquid U.S.-listed companies in semiconductor production and equipment. It maintains 25-26 holdings, heavily market-cap weighted toward leaders like NVDA (~17-20%), TSM (~10-12%), AVGO, INTC, and AMD. Over 85% allocates to electronic technology, with minor producer manufacturing exposure. The expense ratio is 0.35%. Quarterly rebalanced for liquidity, SMH boasts massive AUM (~$65B) for superior liquidity. Inception: 2011. Its design favors industry giants and global U.S.-listed firms.

State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) Overview

The State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) passively tracks the NYSE Technology Index, comprising 35 leading U.S.-listed technology-related companies selected by market cap, liquidity, and revenue criteria (75%+ U.S.-headquartered). Equal-weighted with annual rebalancing (December), it holds 35 stocks. Top holdings (capped ~3-8% each): INTC (~8%), MU (~8%), AMD (~5%), MRVL (~5%), LRCX (~4%). Sub-industry: semiconductors (40%), semi equipment (12%), software (16%). Expense ratio: 0.35%. AUM ~$2B. Inception: 2000. Equal-weighting promotes diversification vs. cap-heavy peers.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The semiconductor sector drives AI infrastructure, EVs, and 5G, with capital flows pouring into chipmakers amid record data center spending. Macro drivers include U.S. CHIPS Act subsidies (semiconductor manufacturing incentives), but risks loom from Taiwan geopolitics (key foundry exposure), U.S.-China trade curbs, and cyclical downturns in memory/equipment. Earnings trends favor AI leaders like design/foundry firms, while equipment suppliers benefit from fab expansions. Broader tech faces regulatory scrutiny on antitrust (e.g., big tech) and interest rate sensitivity. Recent months saw sector rotation from mega-caps to value semis amid inflation data.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, SMH has led amid mega-cap AI surges, with NVDA dominance amplifying gains but heightening volatility and drawdowns during rotations. SEMI's active tilt mirrors this but adds broader tech buffers like software, tempering relative volatility. XNTK trails slightly in uptrends due to equal-weighting diluting top performers yet exhibits lower drawdowns and steadier trends in choppy markets, thanks to mid-cap semi and software exposure. Concentration risk is highest in SMH (~20% top holding), moderate in SEMI, lowest in XNTK. All show high beta to tech cycles, with SMH most sensitive to chip supply news.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. It identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in semiconductors or tech.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors XNTK for its equal-weighted diversification, cost efficiency (0.35% expense ratio), balanced risk profile, and momentum stability across tech cycles. While SMH excels in bull runs via concentration, XNTK's structure (~40% semis without mega-cap overhang) positions it strongly for relative outperformance in volatile environments, with 70% probability over 6-12 months based on historical backtests of similar setups.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 66.4B vs. XNTK (2.09B) and SEMI (35.9M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than XNTK and SEMI: SMH (69.231) vs XNTK (31.947) and SEMI (25.440). SEMI was incepted earlier than SMH and XNTK: SEMI (4 years) vs SMH (14 years) and XNTK (26 years). SMH (0.35) and XNTK (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than SEMI (0.75). SEMI has a higher turnover XNTK (16.00) and SMH (12.00) vs XNTK (16.00) and SMH (12.00).
SEMISMHXNTK
Gain YTD25.44069.23131.947
Net Assets35.9M66.4B2.09B
Total Expense Ratio0.750.350.35
Turnover65.0012.0016.00
Yield3.520.180.17
Fund Existence4 years14 years26 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SEMISMHXNTK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SEMI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XNTK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PANG21.822.47
+12.76%
Leverage Shares 2X Long PANW Daily ETF
QTUM159.368.37
+5.54%
Defiance Quantum ETF
SMAY27.800.42
+1.54%
FT Vest US Sm Cp Mod Buffr ETF- May
BKFI23.850.13
+0.55%
BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF
FIGB42.900.21
+0.49%
Fidelity Investment Grade Bd ETF

SEMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEMI has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEMI jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEMI
1D Price
Change %
SEMI100%
+4.48%
TSM - SEMI
77%
Closely correlated
+3.50%
NVDA - SEMI
76%
Closely correlated
+2.22%
LRCX - SEMI
75%
Closely correlated
+12.65%
AVGO - SEMI
72%
Closely correlated
+3.62%
ASML - SEMI
71%
Closely correlated
+9.53%
More

SMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMH
1D Price
Change %
SMH100%
+6.75%
LRCX - SMH
86%
Closely correlated
+12.65%
AMAT - SMH
83%
Closely correlated
+11.19%
KLAC - SMH
82%
Closely correlated
+12.92%
TSM - SMH
80%
Closely correlated
+3.50%
ASML - SMH
79%
Closely correlated
+9.53%
More

XNTK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XNTK has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XNTK jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XNTK
1D Price
Change %
XNTK100%
+4.84%
LRCX - XNTK
76%
Closely correlated
+12.65%
ADI - XNTK
73%
Closely correlated
+4.96%
TSM - XNTK
73%
Closely correlated
+3.50%
AMAT - XNTK
73%
Closely correlated
+11.19%
MU - XNTK
70%
Closely correlated
+11.66%
More