AEM
Price
$206.25
Change
-$9.19 (-4.27%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
104.64B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EGO
Price
$45.48
Change
-$2.55 (-5.31%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
11.87B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM vs EGO

AEM vs EGO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. EGO commentary
Aug 29, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Hold and EGO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2026
Stock price -- (AEM: $206.25 vs. EGO: $45.48)
Brand notoriety: AEM and EGO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 122% vs. EGO: 117%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $104.64B vs. EGO: $11.87B
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $104.64B. EGO’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $11.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $14.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEGO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EGO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AEM and EGO are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EGO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • EGO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the short-term than EGO.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.54% price change this week, while EGO (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +34.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -22.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

EGO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.41% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($105B) has a higher market cap than EGO($11.9B). AEM has higher P/E ratio than EGO: AEM (17.66) vs EGO (15.85). EGO YTD gains are higher at: 27.109 vs. AEM (22.178). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.5B vs. EGO (1.09B). AEM has more cash in the bank: 3.48B vs. EGO (555M). AEM has less debt than EGO: AEM (320M) vs EGO (1.76B). AEM has higher revenues than EGO: AEM (14.5B) vs EGO (2.02B).
AEMEGOAEM / EGO
Capitalization105B11.9B882%
EBITDA10.5B1.09B968%
Gain YTD22.17827.10982%
P/E Ratio17.6615.85111%
Revenue14.5B2.02B719%
Total Cash3.48B555M627%
Total Debt320M1.76B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs EGO: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
EGO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4435
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3829
SMR RATING
1..100
4267
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7718
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EGO's Valuation (78) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (93) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (38) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as EGO (67) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to EGO’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (38) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

EGO's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (77) in the null industry. This means that EGO’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMEGO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EGO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNOV1.430.01
+1.06%
Medicinova
HOVNP19.640.17
+0.85%
Hovnanian Enterprises
HUBG39.61-0.37
-0.93%
Hub Group
ALLY42.18-0.56
-1.31%
Ally Financial
CCCC3.85-0.25
-6.10%
C4 Therapeutics

AEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AEM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEM
1D Price
Change %
AEM100%
-4.27%
WPM - AEM
92%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
KGC - AEM
92%
Closely correlated
-3.81%
CGAU - AEM
89%
Closely correlated
-3.34%
NEM - AEM
89%
Closely correlated
-3.26%
FNV - AEM
88%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
More

EGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EGO has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EGO jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EGO
1D Price
Change %
EGO100%
-5.31%
KGC - EGO
83%
Closely correlated
-3.81%
NEM - EGO
83%
Closely correlated
-3.26%
IAG - EGO
83%
Closely correlated
-4.41%
AEM - EGO
82%
Closely correlated
-4.27%
WPM - EGO
82%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
More