Ad is loading...
AG
Price
$6.34
Change
-$0.11 (-1.71%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
94 days until earnings call
MBYMF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

AG vs MBYMF

Header iconAG vs MBYMF Comparison
Open Charts AG vs MBYMFBanner chart's image
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER
Price$6.34
Change-$0.11 (-1.71%)
Volume$26.87M
CapitalizationN/A
MTB METALS
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$13.5K
CapitalizationN/A
AG vs MBYMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AG vs. MBYMF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AG is a StrongSell and MBYMF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AG: $6.34 vs. MBYMF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: AG: Notable vs. MBYMF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AG: 235% vs. MBYMF: 21%
Market capitalization -- AG: $1.79B vs. MBYMF: $8.55M
AG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.79B. MBYMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMBYMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MBYMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AG is a better buy in the long-term than MBYMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

AG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.94% price change this week, while MBYMF (@Precious Metals) price change was -28.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

AG is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AG($1.79B) has a higher market cap than MBYMF($8.55M). AG has higher P/E ratio than MBYMF: AG (87.72) vs MBYMF (33.78). AG YTD gains are higher at: 3.396 vs. MBYMF (-79.140). MBYMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -757.63K vs. AG (-77.45M). AG has more cash in the bank: 202M vs. MBYMF (2.7M). AG has higher revenues than MBYMF: AG (587M) vs MBYMF (0).
AGMBYMFAG / MBYMF
Capitalization1.79B8.55M20,990%
EBITDA-77.45M-757.63K10,222%
Gain YTD3.396-79.140-4%
P/E Ratio87.7233.78260%
Revenue587M0-
Total Cash202M2.7M7,495%
Total Debt255MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AG vs MBYMF: Fundamental Ratings
AG
MBYMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5395
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9489
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBYMF's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as AG (81) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MBYMF’s stock grew similarly to AG’s over the last 12 months.

MBYMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MBYMF’s stock grew similarly to AG’s over the last 12 months.

AG's SMR Rating (89) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MBYMF (90) in the null industry. This means that AG’s stock grew similarly to MBYMF’s over the last 12 months.

AG's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBYMF (95) in the null industry. This means that AG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBYMF’s over the last 12 months.

MBYMF's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as AG (94) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MBYMF’s stock grew similarly to AG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JERSX11.840.01
+0.08%
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate S
TFEQX11.94-0.02
-0.17%
Templeton Instl Intl Eq Ser Primary
ARTTX24.28-0.19
-0.78%
Artisan Focus Fund Investor
CEUFX55.68-0.54
-0.96%
American Funds Europacific Growth 529F1
JISGX22.40-0.48
-2.10%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth L

MBYMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBYMF and SLSR have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBYMF and SLSR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBYMF
1D Price
Change %
MBYMF100%
N/A
SLSR - MBYMF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
MTA - MBYMF
23%
Poorly correlated
-7.17%
MUX - MBYMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
SMAGF - MBYMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.60%
AG - MBYMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
More