ALTO
Price
$4.76
Change
+$0.14 (+3.03%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
368.83M
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CMT
Price
$23.56
Change
+$0.23 (+0.99%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
201.75M
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALTO vs CMT

ALTO vs CMT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Alto Ingredients (ALTO) vs. Core Molding Technologies (CMT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ALTO has staged a dramatic financial turnaround, swinging from a net loss of $58.9 million in fiscal 2024 to a net profit of $13.3 million in fiscal 2025, fueled by operational restructuring and margin improvement initiatives.
  • CMT remains profitable and cash-flow-positive despite cyclical headwinds in its core truck and powersports end-markets, demonstrating disciplined cost management and a growing pipeline of new business wins.
  • ALTO stock has surged approximately 281% over the trailing twelve months, significantly outpacing CMT's roughly 38% gain over the same period, though ALTO's recent weeks have been marked by heightened volatility and a pullback from mid-July highs.
  • CMT trades at a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of approximately 22, while ALTO currently carries a P/E near 12.5, reflecting starkly different market expectations and earnings trajectories.
  • Both companies operate in fundamentally different industries — specialty alcohols and renewable fuels versus engineered composite materials — making this comparison a study in contrasting business cycles and growth catalysts.

Introduction

Investors scanning the small- and mid-cap universe for turnaround stories, value opportunities, and cyclical-recovery plays may find themselves evaluating two very different names: ALTO and CMT. Alto Ingredients is a producer of specialty alcohols, renewable fuels, and essential ingredients. Core Molding Technologies is an engineered materials company manufacturing molded structural plastics and composites for heavy-truck, powersports, building products, and industrial markets. Though separated by sector, both stocks have drawn attention from traders evaluating relative performance, earnings momentum, and risk-adjusted positioning. This stock comparison examines how each company has navigated the current market environment, what is shaping sentiment, and how AI-driven analysis might assess the two side by side.

ALTO Overview and Recent Performance

ALTO, headquartered in Pekin, Illinois, is a leading producer and distributor of specialty alcohols used in health, home, and beauty products, grain neutral spirits for beverages, and renewable fuels including ethanol. The company also supplies essential ingredients such as corn germ and liquid CO₂ across three operating segments: Marketing and Distribution, Pekin Campus Production, and Western Production.

After several challenging years, Alto Ingredients has delivered a remarkable financial turnaround. In fiscal 2025, the company reported net income attributable to common stockholders of $12.1 million, or $0.16 per diluted share, compared with a net loss of $60.3 million, or $0.82 per share, in fiscal 2024. Full-year revenue was $917.9 million. The third quarter of 2025 was a standout period, with net income reaching $13.9 million and adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) climbing to $21.4 million. Management attributed the improvement to a strategic shift toward higher-margin export markets, cost-reduction initiatives, increased demand for liquid CO₂, and the positive impact of Section 45Z clean-fuel production tax credits.

In recent weeks, ALTO's stock price has experienced considerable turbulence. After climbing from under $1.00 in late 2025 to a 52-week high of $6.11 in July 2026, shares have pulled back sharply, trading near $4.50 in the final days of July. The pullback has been characterized by above-average daily trading volumes, suggesting active repositioning by institutional and retail participants. The stock's year-to-date gain of roughly 56% remains substantial, but the recent retreat signals that the market is reassessing the pace and durability of Alto's earnings recovery.

CMT Overview and Recent Performance

CMT, based in Columbus, Ohio, is an engineered materials company specializing in molded thermoplastic and thermoset structural products. Its manufacturing processes include sheet molding compound (SMC) compression molding, resin transfer molding (RTM), and direct long-fiber thermoplastic (D-LFT) molding. Core Molding serves blue-chip customers across medium- and heavy-duty trucking, powersports, building products, industrial, and utility markets throughout North America.

Core Molding Technologies posted fiscal 2025 net sales of $273.8 million, a 9.5% decline from $302.4 million in the prior year, driven primarily by weakness in its truck segment — which accounted for roughly 44% of product sales — and softer consumer demand in powersports. Despite the top-line contraction, the company delivered net income of $11.2 million, or $1.29 per diluted share, and generated operating cash flow of $19.2 million. Gross margins held steady at 17.4%, within management's long-term target range of 17% to 19%.

In recent weeks, CMT shares have traded in a relatively stable range between approximately $23 and $25, following a gradual climb from the $16–$17 level observed in mid-2025. The company's forward outlook is supported by $63 million in new program wins secured during fiscal 2025 and a pipeline expected to generate $150 million in incremental revenue over the next several years. The ongoing expansion of manufacturing facilities in Matamoros and a new plant in Monterrey, Mexico — backed by $25–30 million in planned capital expenditures — underscores management's confidence in a multi-year growth trajectory. Market sentiment appears to be cautiously optimistic, weighed between near-term cyclical weakness and a compelling medium-term recovery narrative.

Trending AI Robots

In a market environment where rapid shifts in momentum can reshape relative performance within days, AI-driven trading tools have become an increasingly important resource for active traders. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's best-performing AI trading bots, chosen from a roster of hundreds of virtual agents that trade thousands of tickers. These bots employ a wide spectrum of strategies — ranging from short-term breakout and swing-trading models to longer-duration trend-following approaches — and operate across timeframes as brief as 5 minutes to as long as several days. Performance metrics among featured bots have shown annualized returns spanning from moderate single digits to over 100% in select cases, with win rates often exceeding 55% and profit factors above 2.0 in favorable market regimes. Each bot is built on Tickeron's proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs), which continuously adapt to evolving price action and volatility. For traders seeking data-driven decision support in a complex market, exploring the Trending AI Robots page may reveal strategies aligned with current conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Comparing ALTO and CMT requires acknowledging that they occupy entirely different corners of the industrial economy. Alto Ingredients is a commodity-adjacent producer highly sensitive to ethanol crush spreads, renewable fuel regulation, and agricultural input costs. Core Molding is a specialty manufacturer whose fortunes are tied to capital equipment cycles, particularly in heavy-duty trucking and powersports.

From a momentum perspective, ALTO has been the far more explosive performer over the past year, riding a powerful turnaround narrative and a wave of regulatory tailwinds. However, that same magnitude of price appreciation has introduced elevated volatility — a characteristic that may appeal to momentum-oriented traders but could deter those seeking smoother return profiles. CMT, by contrast, has delivered more measured appreciation, underpinned by consistent profitability, strong free cash flow generation, and a visible growth pipeline.

On valuation, the divergence is notable. ALTO's trailing P/E of roughly 12.5 reflects the market's skepticism about whether recent profitability is sustainable, while CMT's P/E of approximately 22 suggests investors are pricing in a cyclical earnings recovery and the longer-term benefits of new program wins. CMT also carries a stronger balance sheet, with total liquidity of $88.1 million at year-end 2025 and a conservative debt-to-adjusted-EBITDA ratio well under 1.0x. Alto ended 2025 with $23.4 million in cash and borrowing availability of $102 million, adequate but less comfortable relative to its revenue base.

Risk factors also diverge. ALTO faces exposure to renewable fuel policy uncertainty, commodity price swings, and the execution risk inherent in its ongoing operational restructuring. CMT's primary risk is cyclical: a prolonged downturn in Class 8 truck orders or powersports demand would directly pressure revenue and margins, though its diversification into building products and industrial markets provides a partial hedge.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, fundamental stability, and relative risk-reward positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely tilt toward CMT as the more probabilistically favorable candidate for trend-following strategies in the current environment. Core Molding's steadier price action, strong balance sheet, disciplined margin management, and multi-year revenue visibility from contracted program wins offer a more consistent trend structure — precisely the type of profile many AI trend-detection models are calibrated to favor. ALTO's recent performance has been undeniably impressive in magnitude, but the sharp pullback from mid-July highs and elevated intraday volatility introduce a degree of noise that can challenge systematic trend models. That said, in a scenario where renewable fuel credits expand further and ethanol margins strengthen, ALTO's upside optionality could once again attract momentum-focused AI strategies. The relative ranking between these two stocks is not static, and AI systems that dynamically reallocate based on evolving signals may shift their preference as new data emerges.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ALTO vs. CMT commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALTO is a Hold and CMT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (ALTO: $4.76 vs. CMT: $23.56)
Brand notoriety: ALTO and CMT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALTO: 52% vs. CMT: 82%
Market capitalization -- ALTO: $368.83M vs. CMT: $201.75M
ALTO [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $368.83M. CMT’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $201.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $221.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $11.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALTO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCMT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALTO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMT is a better buy in the long-term than ALTO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALTO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALTO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMT is a better buy in the short-term than ALTO.

Price Growth

ALTO (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +2.59% price change this week, while CMT (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -3.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALTO is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

CMT is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.32% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALTO($369M) has a higher market cap than CMT($202M). CMT has higher P/E ratio than ALTO: CMT (21.23) vs ALTO (12.86). ALTO YTD gains are higher at: 65.278 vs. CMT (17.506). ALTO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 64.2M vs. CMT (24.9M). CMT has more cash in the bank: 23.5M vs. ALTO (20.3M). CMT has less debt than ALTO: CMT (32.8M) vs ALTO (91.3M). ALTO has higher revenues than CMT: ALTO (916M) vs CMT (271M).
ALTOCMTALTO / CMT
Capitalization369M202M183%
EBITDA64.2M24.9M258%
Gain YTD65.27817.506373%
P/E Ratio12.8621.2361%
Revenue916M271M338%
Total Cash20.3M23.5M86%
Total Debt91.3M32.8M278%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALTO vs CMT: Fundamental Ratings
ALTO
CMT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5089
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10076
SMR RATING
1..100
6583
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9613
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a49

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMT's Valuation (66) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as ALTO (67) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CMT’s stock grew similarly to ALTO’s over the last 12 months.

CMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as ALTO (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CMT’s stock grew similarly to ALTO’s over the last 12 months.

ALTO's SMR Rating (65) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as CMT (83) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that ALTO’s stock grew similarly to CMT’s over the last 12 months.

ALTO's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as CMT (47) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that ALTO’s stock grew similarly to CMT’s over the last 12 months.

CMT's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALTO (96) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CMT’s stock grew significantly faster than ALTO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALTOCMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALTO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CMT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBPTX61.530.24
+0.39%
Neuberger Large Cap Value Tr
RYLGX129.530.15
+0.12%
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth A
FSCCX38.99N/A
N/A
Nuveen Small Cap Value I
SCRSX13.92-0.07
-0.50%
Bernstein Small Cap Core SCB
VVIIX15.18-0.12
-0.78%
VOYA VACS Index Series I Portfolio

ALTO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALTO has been loosely correlated with CMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALTO jumps, then CMT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALTO
1D Price
Change %
ALTO100%
+3.03%
CMT - ALTO
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
GPRE - ALTO
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.49%
RPC - ALTO
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
WLK - ALTO
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
OLN - ALTO
24%
Poorly correlated
-16.51%
More