It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMAL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFHB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.34% price change this week, while FHB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.
AMAL is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
FHB is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
AMAL | FHB | AMAL / FHB | |
Capitalization | 732M | 2.8B | 26% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 34.207 | 23.252 | 147% |
P/E Ratio | 8.10 | 11.69 | 69% |
Revenue | 286M | 805M | 36% |
Total Cash | 5.49M | 246M | 2% |
Total Debt | 336M | 500M | 67% |
AMAL | FHB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FHB's Valuation (77) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (81). This means that FHB’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.
AMAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHB (64). This means that AMAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHB’s over the last 12 months.
FHB's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (16). This means that FHB’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.
AMAL's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FHB (40). This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.
FHB's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (25). This means that FHB’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.
AMAL | FHB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago64% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 6 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 6 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago60% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago59% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago66% | 7 days ago62% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago61% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMAL has been closely correlated with BHLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMAL jumps, then BHLB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMAL | 100% | -2.47% | ||
BHLB - AMAL | 80% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
BY - AMAL | 80% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
FHB - AMAL | 80% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
HWC - AMAL | 80% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
CTBI - AMAL | 80% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHB has been closely correlated with SSB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHB jumps, then SSB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FHB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FHB | 100% | -0.15% | ||
SSB - FHB | 90% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
ASB - FHB | 88% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
HWC - FHB | 88% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
UBSI - FHB | 88% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
FFBC - FHB | 88% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
More |