Ad is loading...
AMAL
Price
$35.56
Change
-$0.90 (-2.47%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
66 days until earnings call
FHB
Price
$27.20
Change
-$0.04 (-0.15%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
67 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AMAL vs FHB

Header iconAMAL vs FHB Comparison
Open Charts AMAL vs FHBBanner chart's image
Amalgamated Financial
Price$35.56
Change-$0.90 (-2.47%)
Volume$310.83K
CapitalizationN/A
First Hawaiian
Price$27.20
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
Volume$632.95K
CapitalizationN/A
AMAL vs FHB Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMAL vs. FHB commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAL is a Sell and FHB is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AMAL: $35.56 vs. FHB: $27.20)
Brand notoriety: AMAL and FHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMAL: 170% vs. FHB: 107%
Market capitalization -- AMAL: $732.23M vs. FHB: $2.8B
AMAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $732.23M. FHB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMAL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFHB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMAL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FHB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMAL is a better buy in the long-term than FHB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FHB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHB is a better buy in the short-term than AMAL.

Price Growth

AMAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.34% price change this week, while FHB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMAL is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

FHB is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHB($2.8B) has a higher market cap than AMAL($732M). FHB has higher P/E ratio than AMAL: FHB (11.69) vs AMAL (8.10). AMAL YTD gains are higher at: 34.207 vs. FHB (23.252). FHB has more cash in the bank: 246M vs. AMAL (5.49M). AMAL has less debt than FHB: AMAL (336M) vs FHB (500M). FHB has higher revenues than AMAL: FHB (805M) vs AMAL (286M).
AMALFHBAMAL / FHB
Capitalization732M2.8B26%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD34.20723.252147%
P/E Ratio8.1011.6969%
Revenue286M805M36%
Total Cash5.49M246M2%
Total Debt336M500M67%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMAL vs FHB: Fundamental Ratings
AMAL
FHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7724
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1864
SMR RATING
1..100
1612
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2518
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FHB's Valuation (77) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (81). This means that FHB’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHB (64). This means that AMAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHB’s over the last 12 months.

FHB's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (16). This means that FHB’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FHB (40). This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to FHB’s over the last 12 months.

FHB's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (25). This means that FHB’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMALFHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBBZX7.34-0.05
-0.68%
AB Relative Value Z
SCVJX42.47-0.36
-0.84%
Allspring Small Company Value R6
MELIX15.62-0.19
-1.20%
Morgan Stanley Inst EMkts Ldrs I
FZAIX49.18-0.64
-1.28%
Fidelity Advisor International Discv Z
PGKRX27.32-0.75
-2.67%
PGIM Jennison Technology R6

AMAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMAL has been closely correlated with BHLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMAL jumps, then BHLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMAL
1D Price
Change %
AMAL100%
-2.47%
BHLB - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
BY - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
FHB - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
HWC - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
CTBI - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
More

FHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHB has been closely correlated with SSB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHB jumps, then SSB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHB
1D Price
Change %
FHB100%
-0.15%
SSB - FHB
90%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
ASB - FHB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
HWC - FHB
88%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
UBSI - FHB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
FFBC - FHB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
More