Advertisement
AMS vs PNTG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMS is a Hold and PNTG is a Hold.
| AMS | PNTG | AMS / PNTG | |
| Capitalization | 9.81M | 1.37B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 3.49M | 73.4M | 5% |
| Gain YTD | -30.118 | 39.254 | -77% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.31 | 43.10 | 29% |
| Revenue | 30.4M | 1.1B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 6.51M | 15.3M | 43% |
| Total Debt | 22.1M | 494M | 4% |
AMS | PNTG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 31 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMS's Valuation (56) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as PNTG (84) in the null industry. This means that AMS’s stock grew similarly to PNTG’s over the last 12 months.
PNTG's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as AMS (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that PNTG’s stock grew similarly to AMS’s over the last 12 months.
PNTG's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as AMS (93) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that PNTG’s stock grew similarly to AMS’s over the last 12 months.
PNTG's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as AMS (63) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that PNTG’s stock grew similarly to AMS’s over the last 12 months.
PNTG's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMS (97) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that PNTG’s stock grew significantly faster than AMS’s over the last 12 months.
| AMS | PNTG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 70% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PNTG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PNTG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNTG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PNTG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AMS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +3.11% price change this week, while PNTG (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +3.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
PNTG is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.85% weekly)Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
Advertisement
AMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMS and BKD have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMS and BKD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMS | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| BKD - AMS | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
| PNTG - AMS | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
| ADUS - AMS | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
| HCA - AMS | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
| THC - AMS | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||
PNTG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNTG has been loosely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PNTG jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PNTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNTG | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| UHS - PNTG | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| AVAH - PNTG | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| ADUS - PNTG | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| CON - PNTG | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.07% | ||
| ENSG - PNTG | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||