Asset management firms like APAM and SEIC operate in a sector sensitive to market flows, interest rates, and investor sentiment. This comparison examines their business models, recent performance, and market positioning amid evolving financial conditions. Traders seeking short-term momentum and long-term investors evaluating growth stability may find value in understanding their relative strengths, such as AUM trends and revenue drivers, in the current environment.
Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM) is a global investment manager focusing on active strategies across equities and fixed income for institutional and retail clients. In recent market activity, its stock has shown mixed behavior, with shares trading around $37.50 after a 1-month gain of about 5% but a 3-month decline near 15%. Preliminary AUM fell to $173 billion by late March 2026 from higher levels earlier in the year, influenced by market volatility and net outflows. Sentiment reflects valuation discussions post-price swings, with a trailing P/E of 9.28 and year-to-date returns varying between flat and modestly positive, pressured by broader sector rotations.
SEI Investments Company (SEIC) provides technology-enabled solutions, asset management, and investment processing for institutions and advisors. Recent weeks have seen steady price action around $81, with shares up over 2% in short-term moves and year-to-date gains near 1%. The firm reported strong Q4 2025 results, with revenues rising 9% to $608 million and AUM expanding 16% year-over-year, supported by client wins and partnerships like those with IBM for AI transformation. This has driven positive sentiment, with total assets under administration nearing $1.9 trillion.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots out of 351 available, curated for current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, dip buying, and trend following, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days. Performance highlights include annualized returns from +15.50% to +167.82%, win rates of 53.91% to 87.72%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Sector-focused bots target semiconductors (e.g., +97% returns), industrials, finance, and small caps, adapting to volatility. Explore these high-performing, data-driven tools to enhance your trading edge in dynamic markets.
Both firms thrive in asset management, but APAM emphasizes boutique active strategies with $173 billion AUM, while SEIC offers integrated platforms with $1.9 trillion in assets, blending management and administration for diversified revenue. Growth drivers differ: SEIC benefits from technology outsourcing (55% of revenue) and buyouts, versus APAM's fee-based model tied to equity markets. Recent momentum favors SEIC post-earnings, while APAM shows value via lower P/E but higher flow risks. Risk factors include market sensitivity for both, with SEIC's scale mitigating volatility and APAM exposed to outflows. Sentiment leans positive for SEIC amid analyst upgrades.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors SEIC over APAM, based on superior trend consistency from earnings growth, client expansions, and higher analyst conviction. SEIC's larger scale and tech diversification position it better for stability amid recent market shifts, though APAM's valuation offers contrarian appeal if flows stabilize.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
APAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.40% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.51%.
APAM is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
SEIC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| APAM | SEIC | APAM / SEIC | |
| Capitalization | 2.57B | 11.4B | 23% |
| EBITDA | 496M | 1.04B | 48% |
| Gain YTD | -5.926 | 12.125 | -49% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.02 | 15.45 | 58% |
| Revenue | 1.22B | 2.37B | 52% |
| Total Cash | 300M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 309M | 69.5M | 445% |
APAM | SEIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APAM's Valuation (4) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for SEIC (88). This means that APAM’s stock grew significantly faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.
SEIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APAM (89). This means that SEIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than APAM’s over the last 12 months.
APAM's SMR Rating (16) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SEIC (32). This means that APAM’s stock grew similarly to SEIC’s over the last 12 months.
SEIC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APAM (70). This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to APAM’s over the last 12 months.
SEIC's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APAM (74). This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to APAM’s over the last 12 months.
| APAM | SEIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 6 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 68% | 12 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 55% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EPI | 43.06 | 0.14 | +0.33% |
| WisdomTree India Earnings ETF | |||
| PMO | 10.75 | 0.03 | +0.28% |
| Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust | |||
| VCRM | 76.25 | N/A | N/A |
| Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | |||
| TAXI | 51.25 | N/A | N/A |
| Northern Trust Intermediate Tx Exm BdETF | |||
| FFIU | 21.79 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| Fieldstone UVA Uncons Md-Trm Fxd Inc ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APAM has been closely correlated with CG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APAM jumps, then CG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APAM | 100% | +2.17% | ||
| CG - APAM | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| TROW - APAM | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| BEN - APAM | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| BLK - APAM | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| VCTR - APAM | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEIC | 100% | N/A | ||
| RJF - SEIC | 71% Closely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| AMP - SEIC | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.75% | ||
| STT - SEIC | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.09% | ||
| TROW - SEIC | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| APAM - SEIC | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
More | ||||