It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APCX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCWX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APCX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCWX’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
APCX (@Packaged Software) experienced а -26.71% price change this week, while SCWX (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.
APCX is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.
SCWX is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
APCX | SCWX | APCX / SCWX | |
Capitalization | 21.6M | 533M | 4% |
EBITDA | -18.44M | -60.9M | 30% |
Gain YTD | -76.382 | 13.415 | -569% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 471K | 366M | 0% |
Total Cash | 251K | 68.7M | 0% |
Total Debt | 178K | 7.8M | 2% |
APCX | SCWX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCWX's Valuation (27) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as APCX (44) in the null industry. This means that SCWX’s stock grew similarly to APCX’s over the last 12 months.
SCWX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as APCX (100) in the null industry. This means that SCWX’s stock grew similarly to APCX’s over the last 12 months.
SCWX's SMR Rating (91) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as APCX (100) in the null industry. This means that SCWX’s stock grew similarly to APCX’s over the last 12 months.
SCWX's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APCX (95) in the null industry. This means that SCWX’s stock grew somewhat faster than APCX’s over the last 12 months.
SCWX's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as APCX (100) in the null industry. This means that SCWX’s stock grew similarly to APCX’s over the last 12 months.
APCX | SCWX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago86% | about 1 month ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that APCX and QH have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APCX and QH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
APCX | 100% | -2.69% | ||
QH - APCX | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.79% | ||
BTRCF - APCX | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IDN - APCX | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
SY - APCX | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
SCWX - APCX | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCWX has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCWX jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCWX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SCWX | 100% | N/A | ||
CLSK - SCWX | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
TEAM - SCWX | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.98% | ||
RIOT - SCWX | 40% Loosely correlated | +4.26% | ||
COMP - SCWX | 39% Loosely correlated | -4.24% | ||
COIN - SCWX | 37% Loosely correlated | +9.69% | ||
More |