Advertisement
ARES vs HLNE
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ares Management Corporation (ARES) vs. Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Ares Management Corporation (ARES) boasts a larger market capitalization of $25.3 billion compared to Hamilton Lane Incorporated's (HLNE) $3.9 billion, reflecting greater scale in alternative assets.
- Both stocks have delivered strong year-to-date gains around 30%, amid broader market volatility, driven by fundraising successes and private market demand.
- ARES recently raised $5.4 billion for value-add real estate strategies and agreed to acquire Whitestone REIT for $1.7 billion, bolstering growth catalysts.
- HLNE launched new interval funds in private credit and infrastructure, with assets under management (AUM) surpassing $1 trillion.
- ARES trades at a higher price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 65.6 versus HLNE's 15.95, highlighting a potential value trade-off.
- Analyst price targets suggest upside: $144 for ARES and $138 for HLNE.
Introduction
Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) are prominent players in the alternative asset management space, focusing on private credit, equity, and real estate. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to private markets amid rising interest in non-traditional assets. Traders monitoring relative performance may find value in evaluating their business models, recent momentum, and market positioning, especially as both navigate volatility in rates and economic uncertainty. With strong year-to-date gains and upcoming earnings, the analysis highlights contrasts in scale, valuation, and growth drivers.
ARES Overview and Recent Performance
Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is an alternative asset manager offering direct lending, private equity, real estate, and infrastructure solutions to mid-sized companies globally. With AUM exceeding $622 billion, it emphasizes financing for undercapitalized firms across sectors like healthcare and energy. In recent market activity, ARES shares have experienced pullbacks from highs near $130, trading around $112 amid broader sector pressures, yet posting year-to-date gains of about 30%. Sentiment has been supported by record fundraising, including $5.4 billion for U.S. and European real estate funds, and a $1.7 billion acquisition of Whitestone REIT. Upcoming Q1 earnings on May 1 are anticipated to reflect deployment highs, influencing near-term positioning.
HLNE Overview and Recent Performance
Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) specializes in private equity and venture capital, managing fund-of-funds, direct investments, and secondaries with AUM over $1 trillion. It targets growth capital and buyouts in tech-enabled and disruptive sectors across global regions. Shares have declined in recent weeks from levels above $120 to around $89, reflecting market sentiment shifts, but year-to-date performance stands at roughly 33%. Key drivers include launches of interval funds in private credit and infrastructure, senior leadership promotions, and consistent earnings beats. Fee-related earnings growth and AUA expansion have bolstered resilience, with Q4 results due May 21.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots selected from over 350 available on the platform, which trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These curated bots include signal agents for real-time alerts, virtual agents for simulated trading, and brokerage agents for automated execution, adapting to low, medium, or high volatility environments. Highlighted for current market conditions, they offer varied timeframes from intraday to long-term, with risk management features like customizable balances for copy trading. While specific win rates and returns vary by bot, the selection emphasizes those demonstrating strong trend-following and momentum capture amid recent volatility. Explore these tools to enhance your trading edge in stocks like ARES and HLNE.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ARES and HLNE both thrive in alternatives but differ in focus: ARES emphasizes direct lending and real estate with broader origination, while HLNE excels in fund-of-funds and secondaries for diversified private equity exposure. Growth drivers include ARES's massive fundraising and M&A (mergers and acquisitions), versus HLNE's product innovation in evergreen funds. Recent momentum shows pullbacks but YTD outperformance; risks for ARES involve elevated valuation, while HLNE faces scale limitations. Sector exposure overlaps in privates, but ARES has stronger credit tilt amid rate shifts, with sentiment favoring its deployment records over HLNE's fee stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently favors ARES with higher probability for near-term outperformance, based on superior scale, recent capital inflows exceeding $5 billion, and diversified catalysts like real estate deployments amid recovering markets. While HLNE offers attractive valuation and earnings consistency, ARES's trend stability and relative positioning provide an edge in current conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARES is a StrongBuy and HLNE is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARES’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLNE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ARES’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HLNE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARES’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLNE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ARES’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HLNE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а -10.52% price change this week, while HLNE (@Investment Managers) price change was -12.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.16%.
Reported Earning Dates
ARES is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
HLNE is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-2.37% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| ARES | HLNE | ARES / HLNE | |
| Capitalization | 27.2B | 3.31B | 823% |
| EBITDA | 2.23B | 488M | 456% |
| Gain YTD | -23.493 | -42.967 | 55% |
| P/E Ratio | 58.02 | 13.43 | 432% |
| Revenue | 5.91B | 759M | 779% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 58.2M | - |
| Total Debt | 14.1B | 356M | 3,961% |
ARES | HLNE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 35 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HLNE's Valuation (12) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (14). This means that HLNE’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLNE (100). This means that ARES’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLNE’s over the last 12 months.
HLNE's SMR Rating (33) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ARES (96). This means that HLNE’s stock grew somewhat faster than ARES’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as HLNE (83). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as HLNE (91). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.
| ARES | HLNE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 78% | 8 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 69% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SLTY | 23.95 | 0.13 | +0.55% |
| YieldMaxTM Ultra Short Opt Inc Strat ETF | |||
| LEO | 6.39 | N/A | N/A |
| BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals | |||
| PBL | 32.76 | -0.34 | -1.04% |
| PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF | |||
| AOR | 68.78 | -0.82 | -1.18% |
| iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allc ETF | |||
| MSTU | 2.42 | -0.28 | -10.37% |
| T-REX 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | |||
HLNE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLNE has been closely correlated with STEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLNE jumps, then STEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLNE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLNE | 100% | -4.88% | ||
| STEP - HLNE | 74% Closely correlated | -5.61% | ||
| BX - HLNE | 68% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| KKR - HLNE | 67% Closely correlated | -3.51% | ||
| TPG - HLNE | 67% Closely correlated | -3.91% | ||
| ARES - HLNE | 65% Loosely correlated | -4.07% | ||
More | ||||