ARKK
Price
$84.76
Change
+$1.18 (+1.41%)
Updated
Sep 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
6.45B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KOMP
Price
$66.18
Change
-$0.42 (-0.63%)
Updated
Sep 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.64B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARKK vs KOMP

ARKK vs KOMP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 02, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) vs. SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP)

Key Takeaways

  • ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) is an actively managed thematic fund focused on disruptive innovation, while SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) is a passive index-tracking product providing broader exposure to new economy themes.
  • ARKK typically holds 35–55 stocks with concentrated positions in high-conviction names, whereas KOMP holds approximately 485 securities for greater diversification across innovation-driven subsectors.
  • Expense ratios differ significantly, with ARKK at 0.75% compared to KOMP at 0.20%, influencing long-term cost efficiency for investors.
  • Sector exposure in both centers on technology and innovation areas, but ARKK emphasizes active stock selection within disruptive themes, while KOMP follows a rules-based composite index of new economy sub-indices.
  • ARKK’s active approach introduces higher potential volatility tied to manager decisions, whereas KOMP’s passive structure offers more consistent tracking of its underlying index with lower turnover.
  • Both ETFs target growth-oriented investors seeking innovation exposure, yet they differ in risk profiles, with ARKK presenting concentrated thematic bets and KOMP delivering diversified new-economy participation.

Introduction

ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) and SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) both provide exposure to companies driving technological disruption and economic transformation. They do not compete directly as identical strategies but represent distinct approaches to similar investor goals: accessing innovation themes. ARKK employs active management for concentrated thematic bets, while KOMP offers passive, rules-based diversification across multiple new-economy subsectors. This comparison helps investors evaluate structural differences, cost implications, and positioning amid ongoing technological advancement and sector evolution.

ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) Overview

ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks long-term growth of capital by investing primarily in domestic and foreign equity securities of companies relevant to its theme of disruptive innovation. The fund typically maintains 35–55 holdings, allowing for concentrated positions in high-conviction ideas across sectors such as technology, healthcare, and consumer discretionary. Top holdings often include companies in artificial intelligence, genomics, and fintech. Its expense ratio stands at 0.75%. As a non-diversified, actively managed product, ARKK features high active share and periodic rebalancing driven by the manager’s assessment of innovation opportunities rather than a fixed index methodology.

SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) Overview

SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the total return performance of the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index before fees and expenses. The index comprises U.S.-listed securities from developed and emerging markets across more than 20 sub-indices focused on new economy themes such as automation, artificial intelligence, robotics, and clean energy. KOMP holds approximately 485 securities, providing broad diversification. Its expense ratio is 0.20%. The fund employs physical replication and annual reconstitution with sub-index weighting based on Sharpe ratios, resulting in a rules-based approach with lower turnover compared to active strategies.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the innovation and new-economy sectors, where advancements in artificial intelligence, automation, robotics, and related technologies continue to reshape industries. Capital flows into these areas reflect sustained investor interest in transformative technologies amid broader macroeconomic shifts, including interest rate environments and regulatory developments around data privacy and emerging tech standards. Risks include sector concentration, rapid technological obsolescence, and sensitivity to earnings cycles in high-growth companies. These dynamics create an environment where thematic exposure can experience periods of outperformance or rotation relative to broader markets during different phases of economic cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, ARKK’s active selection has led to periods of pronounced outperformance or underperformance depending on the success of its concentrated bets in innovation leaders, often resulting in higher volatility. KOMP’s broader index exposure has delivered more stable participation in new-economy themes, with performance influenced by the collective momentum of its diversified holdings across automation and artificial intelligence subsectors. Relative positioning shows ARKK exhibiting greater sensitivity to individual company developments and sector rotations, while KOMP provides steadier alignment with the overall trajectory of new-economy innovation. Interest rate expectations and earnings trends among technology holdings have historically influenced both, though KOMP’s lower cost and diversification may moderate drawdowns during challenging periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like ARKK and KOMP may find the platform useful for ongoing analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as lower expense ratio, greater diversification across hundreds of holdings, and rules-based methodology with consistent index tracking, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of structural favorability to SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and broad new-economy exposure. ARKK’s active approach offers potential for differentiated returns but carries elevated concentration risk and higher costs. Final selection depends on individual risk tolerance and portfolio objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ARKK vs. KOMP commentary
Sep 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARKK is a Hold and KOMP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARKK has more net assets: 6.45B vs. KOMP (2.64B). KOMP has a higher annual dividend yield than ARKK: KOMP (11.131) vs ARKK (10.140). ARKK was incepted earlier than KOMP: ARKK (12 years) vs KOMP (8 years). KOMP (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than ARKK (0.75). KOMP (45.00) and ARKK (43.00) have matching turnover.
ARKKKOMPARKK / KOMP
Gain YTD10.14011.13191%
Net Assets6.45B2.64B244%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.20375%
Turnover43.0045.0096%
Yield0.001.54-
Fund Existence12 years8 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARKKKOMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
ARKK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KOMP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HERZ16.240.03
+0.19%
Herzfeld Credit Income Fund Inc.
IBCA24.53N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corp ETF
RCTR32.89-0.90
-2.66%
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF
DTCR27.22-1.04
-3.68%
Global X Data Center & Dgtl Infrs ETF
CHPS79.93-4.91
-5.79%
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF

ARKK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARKK has been closely correlated with ACHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARKK jumps, then ACHR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARKK
1D Price
Change %
ARKK100%
+1.36%
ACHR - ARKK
68%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
SE - ARKK
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
FIRY - ARKK
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.52%
DDD - ARKK
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.31%
DNA - ARKK
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.85%
More

KOMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KOMP has been closely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KOMP jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KOMP
1D Price
Change %
KOMP100%
-0.61%
BLK - KOMP
68%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
ST - KOMP
67%
Closely correlated
-5.18%
AMRC - KOMP
66%
Loosely correlated
-4.63%
TXN - KOMP
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
EMR - KOMP
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.56%
More